ipl-logo

Thomas Hobbes Social Contract Analysis

757 Words4 Pages

Comparison of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke
Introduction
Ideas and theories given by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke can be seen parallel on many grounds however a clear distinction appears on their notions on social contract, their apparent notions of human nature, the way both the philosophers relates these notions with their social contract theory?
This paper will critically evaluate the viability of notions of both the philosophers and the level these correlations of notions with their social contract theory can be implemented?
View under consideration
This paper focus upon the views of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke on notions of social contract and state of human nature.
Social Contract Notions
The theory proposed by Thomas Hobbes propose that …show more content…

Notions on state of human nature
Thomas Hobbes explains the state of human nature that human beings are by nature made equal, in a sense that human’s possess are equal in terms of skills and strength.
“The weakest has strength enough to kill the strongest, either by secret machination or by confederacy with others” [ ]. According to his view people live in a constant fear like in the state of war not necessarily fighting but with the intention to fight and take preventive measures against each other. He writes that “during the time men live without a common power to keep them all in awe, they are in that condition which is called war; and such a war as is of every man against every man"”
Hobbes support the view that Humans are necessarily and exclusively self-interested. All men live a way what they perceive to be in their best interests. Everything humans are directed towards, is motivated solely by their desire and hence they satisfy as many of their desires.
According to Hobbes gain, safety, and glory or reputation appears to be primary motives behind these desires which creates a ground for humans to act in their best perceived …show more content…

He believed that people improve themselves on the basis of experience they learn in their lives. As reasonable beings, they had the natural ability to govern their own affairs and to look after the welfare of society. Locke criticized absolute monarchy and favored the idea of self-government.
John Locke describes human nature as Man is by nature a social animal. According to Locke, state of nature is not same as state of war. Every one living here is not free to do any things. One has to follow morals and therefore not harm others with regards to their life, health, liberty, or possessions. The people living in this state are equal and therefore equally bound by state of nature to avoid any harms to

Show More
Related

How Does The Character Change Throughout The Book A Single Shard

452 Words | 2 Pages

In the book A Single Shard, there are many characters that change throughout the story. One of those characters is Min, who in the beginning is a cruel and irritable potter. Towards the end of the story, his sympathetic and gracious side shows after a great tragedy in Tree-ear’s life. Tree-ear was an orphan boy taken in by Crane-man who dies suddenly in an accident. This alters the life of Tree-ear greatly; however, Min’s anger grows into love.

Read More

Locke Vs Hobbes Dbq

1208 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes argued that once an individual is a part of an absolute monarchy, they no longer have the rights to branch away from the government. He created the idea that people who are a part of this absolutist society cannot fight against the authority because it provides protection for the people. Locke had another viewpoint which regarded the protection of the people, but he saw it in a civil society. Locke explained that the social contract was the result of men who had the equal rights as a natural concept of life. He preached that all men have rights and freedom to express their opinions and protection of their property.

Read More

How Did John Locke's Influence On The Declaration Of Independence

595 Words | 3 Pages

Locke had stated that when an executive act for his own benefit, and not to serve the ends of the people. He “degrades himself” and becomes “but a single private person without power,” at which point he no longer has any right to rule over the people. Locke expresses the idea of rebellion against an unjust government. By giving the idea of rebellion, he also reveals that a human’s rights have changed over the years and that a man now has inherent rights. It was because of his declaration that the statement, “give me liberty or give me death,” become popular among the American people.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes's Discourse On Inequality And Social Contract

2000 Words | 8 Pages

Thomas Hobbes in his Leviathan and Jean-Jacques Rousseau in his Discourse on Inequality and Social Contract each attempt to explain the rise of and prescribe the proper management of human society. At the foundation of both philosophies is the principle that humans are asocial by nature, a precept each philosopher interprets and approaches in a different way. Hobbes states that nature made humans relatively “equal,” and that “every man is enemy to every man.” Life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short,” he says, and “every man has right to everything.” Rousseau outlines primitive asocial man having “everything necessary for him to live in the state of nature” from “instinct alone,” and being “neither good nor evil.”

Read More

Compare And Contrast Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More

Edmund Burke's Criticisms Of Hobbes Social Contract

1815 Words | 8 Pages

He believes that the human condition, the traditions, experiences, and knowledge acquired by humans, is far to complex to be described by science and therefore avoids he commonly held views of political science from the Enlightenment Era. However, Thomas Hobbes, as he writes in Leviathan (1651) believed that all political phenomenons could be reported systematically as he equated all humans to machines, predictable by consistently acting in their self interest. [PG 3] Burke’s criticism that can be applied to Hobbes lies on three fronts; that the understanding human condition cannot be derived through logic; that consent, explicit or tacit, does not exist after the first social contract; and that a rebellion is neither possible nor effective when in a social contract. Thomas Hobbes’ prefaces his discussion of the social contract by giving credence to what he understood as science.

Read More

Locke Vs Thomas Hobbes State Of Nature Essay

1437 Words | 6 Pages

Hobbes viewed state of nature as a state of war. According to Hobbes, in a state of nature, there is no right to property because no one affords another that right. He stated that property and possessions would inevitably cause men to become enemies. Hobbes believes that people have equal physical and mental ability to harm, and that people will do so for three reasons - competition, difference, and glory. " so that in the state of nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel, first, competition; secondly, difference; thirdly, glory" (Hobbes 2008, p.85).

Read More

What Is John Locke's State Of Nature

548 Words | 3 Pages

John Locke is an enlightened political philosopher whose explanations to his ideas remains profoundly influential. Locke believes people should have the right to do anything they want without the government enforcing them to do a task. In The Second Treatise, Locke discusses some vital concepts of his thinking, beginning with a discussion of the State of Nature. He explains that humans move from a state of nature characterized by perfect freedom and are governed by reason to a civil government in which the authority is vested in a legislative and executive power. In the State of Nature, men are born equal, to have perfect liberty to maintain.

Read More

How Did Thomas Hobbes Influence American Government

1212 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes developed the ‘social contract theory’, which is the idea that civilians give up some of their freedom and liberty for protection from the leader. This concept, which was used during Hobbes’s time, is still a part of the government today. Hobbes brings down this concept in his world famous book, Leviathan. A picture of a ‘giant’ monarch holding onto a tiny world is used to describe his version of the social contract. The drawing depicts the trade of freedom for safety.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Social Contract Theory

1009 Words | 5 Pages

First of all, the social contract theory, is the view that persons ' moral and political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form the society in which they live. This means that in order to live in a good society people must follow established rules and not act on their own natural state. This social contract theory is associated with modern moral and political theory and is given its by Thomas Hobbes. Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory. A little bit of background of Thomas Hobbes, he born in 1588 and died in 1679,he also lived during the most crucial period of early modern England 's history.

Read More

Summary Of Thomas Hobbes Theory Of Social Contract

838 Words | 4 Pages

Summary Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679) theory of social contract, which states that we need moral, legal rules because we want to escape the state of nature which is solitary, poor, brutal, nasty, and short. In this state, a man can kill others, and there are limited resources. This can soon lead to a state of war in which we are constantly disposed to harm others to achieve our goals. So, in this state of war if a person was to possess a beautiful house or property, and had all the comforts, luxuries, and amenities to lead a wonderful life; others could come and harm him and deprive him of his fruit of labor, life, and liberty. Therefore, the state of nature is that of fear, violence, and distrust.

Read More

John Locke's Concept Of Justice

1751 Words | 8 Pages

Locke's most important and influential political writings are contained in his Two Treatises on Government. The first treatise is concerned almost exclusively with refuting the argument that political authority was derived from religious authority. The second treatise contains Locke’s own constructive view of the aims and justification for civil government. According to Locke, the State of Nature, the natural condition of mankind, is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of others. This does not mean, however, that it is a state of license: one is not free to do anything at all one pleases, or even anything that one judges to be in one’s interest.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Hobbes Locke And Rousseau

1740 Words | 7 Pages

Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau have become known as three of the most prominent political theorists in the world today. Their philosophies and innovative thinking is known worldwide and it has influenced the creation of numerous new governments. All three thinkers agree on the idea of a social contract but their opinions differ on how the social contract is established and implemented within each society. These philosophers state, that in order for the social contract to be successful people need to give up certain freedoms in order to secure fundamental protections from the state, henceforth the state then has certain responsibilities to their citizens. Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau all believe that before men were governed we all lived in a state of nature.

Read More

Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

1084 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

Read More

Modernism And Skepticism

1042 Words | 5 Pages

Hobbes’s argument that human being followed pleasure and pain shows the Skepticism of the purity of human knowledge. Consequently Skepticism plays the role of how much human knowledge is legitimate therefore the human being will accept the limited role of being a citizen to the

Read More

More about Thomas Hobbes Social Contract Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document