More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare and contrast the strategies used by martin luther king and malcolm x
Compare and contrast the strategies used by martin luther king and malcolm x
Comparing and contrasting martin luther king jr. and malcolm x's strategies
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Both the articles, learning to Read and Write by Frederick Douglass and Literacy Behind Bars by Malcolm X, are each narrative explaining their own individual journey learning how to read and write. They both coveted to educate himself because they saw education as an open door to freedom. Although, they both desired the same thing, they did not practice identical techniques to achieve their advancement in their education. Douglass used assistance from his mistress and later on, the little white boys in his neighborhood. On the other hand, Malcolm X educated himself in Prison with a dictionary.
Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in only using non-violence in his activism. He used methods like peaceful resistance and non-violent protests. King was already known for organizing and carying out civil rights protests peacefully in the south. I think Kennedy also changed his mind because he saw the success King had already made while working with the SCLC and he knew that it might hurt him politically if he got in the middle of the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr's type of activism would have been a much better choice to allow in Washington than the type Malcolm X used.
Both Frederick Douglass and Malcolm X went through many hardships throughout their lives. These two historical figures used reading and writing as an outlet to escape their unpleasant lives. Similarly neither of these men went to a traditional school or class to learn these monumental skills. Instead they each were motivated and worked hard to teach themselves how to read and write. Although both men used the same hobby as an outlet, how they learned to read and write differ completely.
Malcolm X and Frederick Douglass shared the same purpose throughout the two excerpts. They thought that it was unfair for black people to be neglected from an education because of their skin color. However, the way they chose to address their audience was immensely different from one another. Malcolm X chose to use a more angry and harsh tone of voice in order to get his point across to the reader. He wanted his audience to see how he truly felt about black people not being able to receive an education.
Desire to be More Two great men from two different times fought great odds to become two of the greatest writers during times when they were pushed to fail. Frederick Douglas born a slave and Malcolm X a known criminal both struggled to find educational opportunities. Unlike other minorities of their time they both strived for more. They wanted to be separated from the norm, and they knew that in order for that to happen they would have to find a way to learn. They both knew in order to make a difference in life they would have to become proficient readers and writers, the fundamentals of education.
In both sections of Document 2, many readers begin to realize that activists, such as King and Malcom X, wanted to make sure that Civil Rights movements was not only positive towards society, but was also handled accordingly in order for African Americans to become equal within society. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X demonstrated their difference in thoughts upon how the Civil Rights movements should be incorporated within society, especially when it came to violence. Document 2 demonstrates how both Dr. King and Malcolm X viewed their ideas of violence and how it contributed not only to their work within the movements, but also to the general historical aspect of society as we know it today. Dr King believed that the best way to contribute to the Civil Rights movement was to address the issue in a nonviolent manner. This manner included nonviolent aspects such as sit ins and marches in order to demonstrate a way of negotiating with the leaders within the world while also proclaiming the need for equality.
Martian Luther King Jr and Malcom X where two political figures during the civil rights movement, both men stood and fought for the same reason but both had very different ways in which they would approach how they fought. Martian Luther King Jr took a difference approach to what Malcom X took, mostly he was very against violence and tried to tell the people to stand up by using their words and not be physical but on the other hand Malcom X took a completely different approach a lot of the time telling people violence is sometimes needed to get the message across and make a change. Both approaches from the two men were completely different but both worked much in the same way and helped support African American at the time, they both show how sometimes each style of approach can be used and when some is more effective than another in certain situations.
Have you ever witnessed or experienced something that made you feel blessed, but also burdened from what you have learned? Frederick Douglass in “Learning to Read” and Malcolm X in “A Homemade Education”, both experienced the burden and blessing from gaining an education. Douglass was a slave in the 1800s and Malcolm X was a prisoner in the 1940s. Both men went through a great deal of trouble to gain knowledge in reading and writing. The knowledge Douglass and Malcolm X learned caused them great miseries in their hearts, but also gave them the freedom they deserved.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.
Is the answer to discrimination violence, or is peace the way to go? During the 1960s, African-Americans were being discriminated against and wanted a change. They created the Civil Rights Movement to help gain their equal rights. Two main Civil Rights leaders of the 60s were Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X. Dr. King believed that African Americans could receive their rights by peacefully protesting. Malcolm X believed that in order for African Americans to receive equality, they had to take it by force using violence.
King utilizes repetition, and Malcolm X employs analogies. MLK repeats examples of people considered extremists for their revolutionary ideas to emphasize his own common characteristics with them, “Was not Jesus an extremist for love? … Was not Amos an extremist for justice? …
Martin luther king and Malcolm X were two well known speakers. But there has always been the same question being asked around, whose philosophy is better? Mlk is a supporter of non violence. So is Malcolm X, but his beliefs are a little different than Martin Luther King 's. Malcolm x does not like violence but he does encourage it when the other party starts the disagreement. Mlks believes if the other party has started it you do not fight or hurt them.
Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.
Focusing specifically on the opposition of racial segregation, The Civil Rights movement symbolized the need for change across America. Between the years of 1950 and 1960, events such as; the March on Washington, the Montgomery Bus Boycott, speeches, protests, and sit-ins, directly defined such opposition. Due to such events, two outstanding leaders of their time, Martin Luther King Jr., and Malcolm X emerged into the public eye and began to impact the Civil Rights movement. At a turning point of the century, the two men took charge and became icons across the world while resonating significantly with African American minorities. With such in mind, the two men had extreme differences in their morals, ideals, and religions; however, both deemed
Unlike King’s letter, he does not use a rhetorical question in his speech. This is because it is a speech and he wants his audience to have an emotional appeal, rather that a logical appeal. He wants to have an emotional appeal becauses he is trying to push his audience to fight for civil rights. Martin Luther King Jr. uses rhetorical devices in his
