ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Mark Anthony

763 Words4 Pages

Many people think that violence is the best solution to an argument or disagreement but sometimes using your words and talking is the best way to go. Words can be so much more powerful than going straight to weapons and fighting. Many historical people such as Martin Luther King Jr, Mark Anthony, and Ronald Reagan, have proven that words are stronger than weapons. These people have proven that using your words can get you just as far as fighting and using weapons. Martin Luther King Jr, Mark Anthony, and Ronald Reagan, gave amazing speeches to produce violence and get their feeling and thoughts out to the world. On August 28, 1963 Martin Luther King Jr, gave the speech “I Have A Dream”. When he gave this speech he was looking for freedom, …show more content…

When Mark Anthony gave his speech for Caesar, In act 3 in Julius Caesar Mark Anthony says “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears: I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him. The evil that men do lives after them: The good is oft interred with their bones.”. Mark Anthony was trying to prove to everyone that Caesar wasn't as bad as the conspirators (the people who took Caesar life) were making him out to be. When mark Anthony gave his speech he told them all the good things that Caesar did for them, he did this without bad mouthing the conspirators. He didn't bring out weapons and didn’t fighting he changed everyone perspective on Caesar. Mark Anthony showed emotions and feeling towards the situation to show the crowed that he was genuine about it and all he wanted was for people to know the good that Caesar did for …show more content…

Ronald Reagan wanted to tear down the Berlin Wall, it encircled West Berlin for about 30 years. He gave this speech looking for peace and everyone to be able to see their mates again. Ronald Reagan called the wall a “scar” meaning that it was a bad symbol from cold war. In Ronald Reagan's speech he states “As long as this gate is closed, as long as this scar of a wall is permitted to stand, it is not the German question alone that remains open, but the question of freedom for all mankind.”, all he wanted was peace and for everyone to be able to see their mates again, he wanted the wall known as a “scar” from cold war to be torn down. With this speech he gave he made the wall come down, he didn't use weapons, he didn’t start another war or fight, he used his words to help bring it

Show More
Related

Rhetorical Analysis Of Tear Down This Wall

478 Words | 2 Pages

On June 12, 1987, former President Ronald Reagan made the famous “Tear Down this Wall” speech to the people of West Berlin. President Reagan made this speech in hopes that the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, would tear down The Berlin Wall. This wall was a symbol of the Cold War and how the United States and Soviet Union continually fought for power. This speech was given to convince the people of Berlin that democracy was the best way to go. ("Tear Down This Wall" Analysis) Ronald Reagan was known for being a great communicator.

Read More

Outline On Ronald Reagan And The Berlin Wall

562 Words | 3 Pages

RONALD REAGAN AND THE BERLIN WALL THESIS STATEMENT Ronald Reagan’s speech at the Berlin wall challenged Gorbachev to tear down the wall because communism supported by Soviet Union divided the Germans and caused the Berlin wall. Berlin wall The Berlin Wall, one of the key symbols of the Cold War conflict, was constructed by the Soviet-influenced East German state in August 1961 to stop East Berlin residents from fleeing west. For nearly three decades it reminded the world of the division between East and West, between the Communist and the western countries.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Speech By President Ronald Reagan

393 Words | 2 Pages

His main point throughout his speech was for Germany to be more like America, free. He urges them to put their weapons down

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Tear Down This Wall

552 Words | 3 Pages

Reagan started the speech by talking about Berlin’s past, the Berliner’s unfortunate experiences, the aftermath of WWII, the Marshall Plan, economic prosperity in the West, individual rights, freedom, and the downsides of communism. He does not even introduce his motive till halfway through the speech by which the majority of the audience is disengaged. Right after he tells the Soviet leader, Gorbachev, to “tear down this wall” and to free Berlin, he immediately changes his talking point from the liberalization of Berlin to the arms race between the United States and the Soviet Union (Reagan 13). Afterwards, Reagan does the same exact thing and goes from talking about the arms race to how “Sport represents a source of enjoyment and ennoblement” (Reagan 26). The disordered subjects cause the audience to feel confused and lose focus on the message he’s trying to convey.

Read More

Mlk Ethos Pathos Logos

583 Words | 3 Pages

Martin Luther King Jr’s rhetorical choices stressed the importance of remaining non-violent as well as trying to view the world in the perspective of the opposition. Those choices proved powerful to people of all races. Martin Luther King Jr. incorporated all three modes of persuasion in his speech but it is clear that pathos is the primary vehicle in which he chose to move his audience. Martin Luther King Jr. uses pathos because of the diverse audience itself. If he were to spend all of his time writing his speech on the legislative aspect of the civil rights movement, his speech would not have had the same impact as it did.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Malcolm X

910 Words | 4 Pages

This is due to the fact that, while violence can be used to justify additional tyranny, nonviolent resistance appeals to the moral conscience of both those in authority and the general public. This was acknowledged by King, who wrote in his well-known Letter from Birmingham Jail that "violence, as a way of achieving racial justice, is both impractical and immoral" (Morant, 2019). Therefore, King's adherence to nonviolence was not only a moral decision but also a calculated one. King's emphasis on coalition-building distinguishes his philosophy from Malcolm X's in another way. King understood that in order to make a significant change, it would have the support of not only Black Americans but also White Americans and other marginalized groups.

Read More

John Louis And Frederick Douglass Rhetorical Devices

614 Words | 3 Pages

was one of the most significant African American freedom fighters in America. He gave his well-known speech, “I Have a Dream”, on August 28, 1963, to an audience of about 250,000 people. King presents his speech using symbolism, personification, and euphemism to convey to his audience how he feels about how African Americans are being treated. He says, “It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of captivity.” [King, 1963].

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech

617 Words | 3 Pages

Marc Antony gives his speech at Caesar’s funeral to the citizens of Rome. The purpose of his speech is to prove to the citizens that Brutus is wrong and Caesar shouldn’t have been killed. The tone of his speech is very ironic. It also gets very dramatic as he talks about Caesar being killed.

Read More

Ronald Reagan's Persuasive Speech

876 Words | 4 Pages

So Reagan recognizing the friction between east and west Germany, decided to take a more political approach. He gave his famous “tear down this wall” speech just one hundred yards from the Berlin Wall (www.history.com). It was his call to the Soviet Union president, Mikhail S. Govbachev, to destroy this wall for the unification of East and West Berlin. Near

Read More

Mark Atony's Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

292 Words | 2 Pages

In Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus’ decision to allow Mark Antony to speak at the funeral of Julius Caesar marks the turning point of the tragedy through Antony's use of pathos and logos that turns the crowd against the conspirators. After Julius Caesar is killed, Mark Atony reasons with the conspirators, namely Brutus, to allow him to hold a memorial service for Caesar. Brutus, believing that Mark Atony poses no threat to him or the cause he stands for, allows him to do as such. However, during this speech, Mark Antony is able to use several persuasive techniques that turn the crowd against the conspirators, turning the play in a different direction. Mark Antony appeals to the audience's emotions, stating, "Have patience, gentle friends;

Read More

Rhetorical Elements Of Mlk's I Have A Dream Speech

976 Words | 4 Pages

“I Have A Dream” “I Have A Dream”, a quote that many Americans hold dear to their hearts and a quote that is remembered and is associated with an unforgettable movement in history of the Untied States of America. From 1954-1968 one of the most memorable movements in history took place and will not be forgotten is the civil rights movement. Martin Luther King Jr. is one of the many greats remembered and recognized in the movement for being an influential leader of his time. Having given over 2000 speeches, MLK(Martin Luther King) has one particular speech that stands out from the many and it is his “I Have A Dream” speech. MLK’s message being about peace, unity, fairness and freedom for and to all people shines through in this speech.

Read More

Power Of Mark Anthony's Speech In Julius Caesar

367 Words | 2 Pages

Following the assassination of Julius Caesar by Brutus and the conspirators, Mark Anthony delivers a well-known and powerful speech that shows the power of language and the ability to sway public opinion. He repeatedly calls Brutus and the conspirators "honorable men" in this speech, however, he does so in a sardonic manner that he later uses to incite tension and hostility toward the conspirators and Brutus. The people of Rome wanted Julius Ceasar to lead them because he is an excellent and honorable military leader, and he would go on to genuinely persuade and appeal to their feelings and emotions. They wanted Ceasar to lead them because he is a strong and honorable military leader and a close friend of Anthony and Brutus who are both known

Read More

I Have A Dream Speech Ethos Pathos Logos

874 Words | 4 Pages

I have a dream speech Analysis Martin Luther king Jr once said,“ I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration of freedom in the history of our nation.” He addressed these words on August of 1963 at the Lincoln Memorial after marching through the streets of Washington. He addressed segregation injustice and racial discrimination against African Americans that took place during his era, in his “I have a dream speech.” He recognized that american was founded on freedom, democracy where each individual has a voice and matters. Only few weeks back protesters were getting arrested for fighting for equality.

Read More

Mark Anthony Julius Caesar's Funeral Speech

237 Words | 1 Pages

Mark Anthony, a beloved friend to the famous Julius Caesar, praises him during Caesar's funeral speech in front of the Roman congression, to emphasize the greatness of his beloved Caesar. Anthony wants to perceive the same greatness he thinks of Caesar to his fellow roman citizens, and he executes this by saying “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, Which he did thrice refuse” (line 96). Anthony characterizes Caesar as a modest and humble man unwilling to take up the crown even though he knew about the riches and power he could benefit from being Emperor of Rome. By conveying this message to the commoners the mob realizes and hints the simpleness and humbleness of Caesar and his true love for the country rather than the power of the

Read More

Purpose Of Martin Luther King's I Have A Dream Speech

995 Words | 4 Pages

On August 28, 1963, at the March on Washington, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered a speech entitled "I Have a Dream". The purpose of Martin Luther King 's speech was to make Americans of all racial backgrounds aware of the racial, civil, and economic inequality that was taking place in the United States. Martin Luther King 's speech was intended to bring awareness of the problem of inequality and to give Americans hope and faith that one day everyone, black and white, would be equal. King states in his speech that when Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, it gave hope to millions that had experienced injustice and inequality, and his expectation was to bring hope to Americans by delivering this speech just as Lincoln

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Martin Luther King Jr And Mark Anthony

Related Topics

Open Document