ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Mongol Empire And Islamic Empires

397 Words2 Pages
In the 1200s Two very different Empires were thriving and have become very well known and they were called, the Islamic Empire and the Mongol Empire. Even though they are similar, they are far more different than alike. One reason they are far more different is because, they used very different ways of conquering to get more land so they could expand their Empires. The way Mongols conquered land from others was by warfare. If the Mongol Empire was shown any resistance they would show no mercy. The Islamic Empire Had three different ways of conquering land to expand their Empire. The first way of how the Islamic Empire conquered land was by making treaties so they would not have to fight for land. The second way of conquering land
Show More
Related
173 Words | 1 Pages

All the great empires , most notably the Byzantine and Mongols were all defeated after enjoying long periods of success. Mongols were successful because they were interacting with many countries because of their conquests. Conquering others allowed the trade routes in Asia to move north. All these great countries and civilizations were so successful , mostly in part that they all worked together and their ideas spread to one another.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

Beginning in the 18th century, many ancient civilizations began to decline including the Ottoman empire and the Qing dynasty. The Ottomans had reached their peak late in the 15th century. The turkic warriors demolished the Byzantine empire and established an Islamic society in much of the Balkans and the Mediterranean. To the east a new Chinese dynasty was emerging in the mid 17th century. The Qing emperors were not of Chinese descent, but were instead a nomadic group called the Manchu that conquered a declining Ming dynasty in 1644.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

The rise of the Aztec Empire (1150-1521) and Mongol Empire (1206-1368) affected their surrounding regions significantly. Through the invasions by these Empires, the areas they inhabited were conquered and reestablished as their own. The Aztecs and Mongols were similar in many ways including their mutual desire to gain power and land. Although these empires resemble each other in the way they acquired land, they vary in terms of their religion and reasons for engineering advances. Both empires established advances in engineering but, because of their environments, these advances were created differently to benefit themselves.

Read More
78 Words | 1 Pages

The rise of the Aztecs and Mongol Empire 's had a large impact on the areas they inhabited the religions they Ocuvite had been completely Concord and affected by the invasions of these empires both as Tech and Mongols were very similar in many aspects such as their goal to gain more power in Lynn even though the Aztecs the Mongol shared many similarities in their ward tactics they had many differences referring to religious and technological hierarchs aspect

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

There existed many similarities and differences between the Mongol states and those that existed before their quick and successful invasion of the region. Geographically Baghdad was the center of the Islamic empire for a period of 5 years, and the Ilkhanids capital was Azerbaijan. Inspite these differences, the Mongols,majorly the Ilkhanids, had many similarities with those who inhabited the region before them. For instance, under Hulegu’s rule, there was a time of great intellectual expansion; educated men from many different regions were incorporated into the Ilkhanid court where they exchanged knowledge with the Muslim

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, many impactful and memorable empires have arisen. Each empire has its own defining traits that lead to its success or demise. Some empires are very similar, while some posses many different traits. And although some can possess the same quality, their implication and utilization of that quality can create many gaps in the empire’s overall similarity to the other. Two powerful and historically important empires are the Ottoman empire, and the Mughal empire.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The Muslim world expanded tremendously during the 1300s to 1700s. The Ottoman Empire and Safavid Empire were two out of the three empires that had significant changes during these time. Though the Ottoman and Safavid Empire contrast on leaders and ways they rule, they similar on their declination and cultures. In the Ottoman Empire, multiples leaders contributed to the growth of the Empire. Ghazis were warriors for the Islam that followed strict Islamic rules.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

With this unified identity they stopped battling each other over minor disagreements, and instead worked together under genghis khan 's leadership to conquer. Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World abolishes misconceptions about the Mongol Empire . He recognized diplomatic immunity, as well as creating a paper currency a systematic history Thesis: Genghis Khan 's innovative style of warfare won him an empire twice as large as

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

Name Instructor Course Date Legacies of the Mongol Empire The Mongol Empire was established in 1206 by Genghis Khan after swiftly conquering numerous lands in Europe and Asia.

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

My game of civilizations while roleplaying the Mongols is similar and different to the actual history of the Mongols. The first things I did were explored ruins, fought with many city-states and adopted animal husbandry. Animal husbandry is breeding and caring for animals which leads to a good food supply and trading purposes. Although the similarities, there were also many differences between my game and the actual history. I became friendly with with some other city-states, where the Mongols would have just killed them.

Read More
525 Words | 3 Pages

Another difference is how the people were protected. In my game I had units ,such as archers and warriors, stationed in the city to protect the people. The Mongols would leave their cities to plunder other cities. (IHC) A final difference is in my military tactics with foreign affairs.

Read More
324 Words | 2 Pages

The most savage conquerors of history were the Mongols. The Mongolian empire was the largest land empire of its era and occupied land from the yellow sea in Eastern Asia to the border of Eastern Europe. The empire included land in China, Korea, Mongolia, Persia as well as parts of Thailand and Russia. The Mongols derived from loosely organized nomadic tribes around Mongolia, Siberia and Manchuria. They lived off their land and the resources provided, and became great warriors.

Read More
1628 Words | 7 Pages

The Assyrian empire and the Persian empire were two of the earliest major empires in the world. The Assyrians came in to power first, ruling from 900 BC to about 600 BC and with the help of Cyrus the Great, the Persians rose to power around 550BC. The Assyrian and Persian militaries shared many similarities, but they also differed in some aspects. Some of their similarities include their battle tactics, the organization of their armies, and their success in conquering societies. One of the major differences that stood out the most was that the Assyrians used a more brutal approach when conquering and the Persians used a more enlighten approach and were more tolerant.

Read More
1179 Words | 5 Pages

During the formation and expansion of the Mongol Empire (c. 1200-1400CE), there were three main defining factors that allowed for the empire to flourish. The empire existed as a unified, ever expanding entity that ruled between 1206-1260 (Brian 2013, p. 1022). The first and most essential to their formation and expansion was their military strength, ability and ruthlessness; which enabled them to conquer lands and people rapidly. The second was the empire’s religious tolerance of the people that they conquered became quite reputable during the initial formation and expansion of the empire. The third was their use of the trade routes in Asia, which under the Mongol empire came together as a political, social and economic tool that was able to facilitate safe trade and travel (Biran 2013, p. 1024).

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander the Great, the man who spread Hellenism, and Genghis Khan, the infamous savage, are not only viewed as exceedingly different, but are in fact polar opposites. While some views of the leaders may be inaccurate and biased, such as the belief that Genghis is inhumane and savage, the differences between their lives and beliefs are still vast. Alexander was a great general, and lead many people to fight for him, however he lacked in domestic leadership and stability within his empire. Genghis on the other hand was a fierce fighter, who obliterated his enemies, but kept a stable and safe empire for his people. Alexander the Great and Genghis Khan are vastly different due to how and why they lead their people, and fought against others.

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Mongol Empire And Islamic Empires

Related Topics

Open Document