ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast Romero And Martin Luther King Jr

3227 Words13 Pages

Baylor University The Parable of the Good Samaritan in Social Advocacy: A Comparative Study of Oscar Romero and Martin Luther King Jr. Ariel Wright LAS 4350: Oscar Romero & Latin American Environmental Freedom Dr. Matthew Whelan 1 May, 2023 Advocating for the marginalized is what Oscar Romero and Martin Luther King dedicated their lives to. Although they came from different backgrounds and worked for different causes, they shared their commitment to the church and to advocating for others in the face of injustice and adversity. Both Romero and King viewed social responsibility as the solution to the various injustices their people were facing; both utilized the Gospel as evidence for their strong commitments to social responsibility as a means of resolving social injustice. Although King was a Southern Baptist and Romero was a Catholic, they both shared the Christian belief that one who loves God must also love their brothers and sisters, specifically brothers and sisters require help. This mutual love is the basis for their approach to leadership and how their social movements gained traction. Both leaders considered love as the driving force behind their actions, even in the face of opposition from their adversaries. They believed the ultimate show of compassion was protesting against violence with peace, preserving a tough mind while keeping a tender heart. Their shared …show more content…

This preferential option for the poor, prioritizes the empowerment of the most powerless in societ, in this case the majority of Salvadorans. This fraternal love is not only for the poor in this context, but also for the oppressive and combative minority. Although Romero and his followers understood that maintaining this fraternal love was necessary for them to achieve change, they did not let this love soften their devotion to the improvement of the social and economic condition of

Show More
Related
543 Words | 3 Pages

On the tenth anniversary of the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., an article was published in a religious magazine by Cesar Chavez. Dr. King was a leader of the African American civil rights movement, his work, speeches and spread of non-violence inspired many people. He led many marches and uprisings in the African American community, which played a key role in the civil rights movement against inequality. Cesar Chavez, leader of the Chicano movement and labor union organizer, drew inspiration from the strategies of conveyed throughout Dr. King's speech. Cesar Chavez uses this article to persuade and spread the idea of non-violence to fellow Chicanos and leaders in addition to keeping Dr. King's values by using comparison, cause and effect and diction.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr's techniques are very different, but similar. They both want the same thing: negro companies. The way they carry out this, though, is different. Malcolm wants to make his own negro company. Furthermore, Martin wants to protest peacefully by banning products from companies that do not hire negroes.

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

King, who served as a minister, had a deep understanding of Christianity, which he used in his letter to the white clergy. King sought to highlight the immorality of discrimination, especially against those in powerful or religious positions who could assist him in bringing about change. In their capacities as churchmen, these individuals should be aware of the unchristian nature of allowing such bigotry. Social change was necessary regardless of if one ignored inequities or actively condoned segregation. In the absence of other options, King became more visible and vocal in his protests in a non-violent manner (King, 1963, p.5, para. 3).

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

King's philosophy was profoundly influenced by intellectual giants such as Mahatma Gandhi and Henry David Thoreau. Their teachings and principles of nonviolent resistance inspired his analytical and critical approach to civil rights activism. By embracing nonviolence as a powerful means to fight for equality, Dr. King aligned his advocacy with the peaceful democratic processes emphasized in the social contract. The Montgomery Bus Boycott serves as a focal point for analyzing Dr. King's leadership and his instrumental role in demanding equal treatment and access to public services.

Read More
449 Words | 2 Pages

Chavez uses this hypophora in an attempt to elicit the common sense idea that the poor and the workers are the ones who are killed in the case of violent revolutions. Chavez wants to persuade the audience to believe that nonviolent

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

With this information, King noted that those Christians were all extremists in their own right and that that extremism is the form of extremists that King associates himself with. He even went as far as noting hat “Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness.” As result, King defends his methods of nonviolent protesting as a method Christians practiced for centuries and in the process accepted the label extremist, but on his own terms. This effectively rebuttals the clergymen’s arguments and distaste of nonviolent protests by calling them out on their hypocrisy for worshipping a deceased man who practiced the same strategies as King, but turning against him in a time where he needed their utmost

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.

Read More
595 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the 1960s, there have been multiple philosophies from civil rights leaders. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Junior are two very influential and famous leaders of this time. Although they had different views on distinct issues, they ultimately fought for the equivalent cause. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence and equality for all races while being joined together.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

MLK’s ultimate claim is that the church is to blame for these happenings and “the judgement of God is upon the Church as never before”(276). King stated how even the people who were in the church trying to fight for justice had been looked down upon and some had been kicked out of their own churches. King’s claims were passionately presented. He relentlessly provided evidence to prove his position on the issue of injustice and also showed ample amounts of examples to solve these problems.

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

King alludes to several Biblical and historical figures and events in order to justify his actions and decisions. Take, for example, how King refers to Jesus as an extremist for love by recounting the verse, “Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you” (King). Dr. King challenges the clergymen’s claims of being extremist by highlighting that Jesus himself was an extremist because Jesus was an important religious figure not only in Christianity but the world which exemplifies Dr. King’s actions and nonviolent demonstrations and refutes the clergymen’s claims of being extremist. King also makes sure to capture the feelings of all Americans, not just the religious, by suggesting that Abraham Lincoln was also an extremist when he said the words “This nation cannot survive half slave and half free” (King). Dr. King challenges the clergymen’s negative connotation of being an extremist by noting that Lincoln’s philosophies would have been considered extremist at the time, and how those extremist ideas lead to the abolishment of slavery because Lincoln was a popular and notable US president whose actions had a resemblance to what King was trying to achieve.

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

Once these rules were ingrained in their minds, then they could participate in the demonstrations in order to change the community around them for the better. Even though the problem of racial injustice will never be fixed, King believed that to accept passively the issues of an unjust system is to cooperate with the evil in that system (Colaiaco). In our communities today, we as Christians must do more than to accept the evil in them, but actively fight that evil for the greater

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

“We repeatedly asked ourselves: ‘Are you able to accept the blows without retaliating? ‘Are you able to endure the ordeal of Jail?’” These workshops allowed the activists to remain in a stance of compassionate non-violence; they had worked to understand what they were committing to. King stressed himself but also to other activist that was “better to suffer evil than inflict it.” The idea of practicing non-violence created a strong union between the activist, they could understand “the success of the movement depended not just on idealism and courage, but on a keen understanding and ready use of the fulcrums of power.” King during the workshops preached, “I have tired to make it clear that it is wrong to use immoral mean to attain moral ends.”

Read More
1250 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,

Read More
1033 Words | 5 Pages

Martin Luther King,Jr. And Ernesto Guevara were two great people who risked their lives for freedom. Both King and Ernesto had many accomplishments, but they were very different leaders. When we look into their lives, we can see that they were very strong individuals in different communities and they were followed by many people. They had similar dreams and thoughts and they both were struggling for freedom.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

“It was evidenced sublimely in the refusal of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar, on the ground that a higher moral law was at stake. It was practiced superbly by the early Christians” (387) and “I am grateful to God that, through the influence of the Negro church, the way of nonviolence became an integral part of our struggle” (381). Dr. King uses these analogies and examples to show his followers he knows the subject matter at hand. This is another example of King showing his reputation for knowing the

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Romero And Martin Luther King Jr

Related Topics

Open Document