More handpicked essays just for you.
Malcolm x and mlk compare and contrast
Comparison of mlk and malcolm x
Malcolm x and mlk compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Malcolm x and mlk compare and contrast
Martin Luther King Jr. believed in peaceful resolution, where Malcolm X believed in creating a revolution. In both stories, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. communicate their stance on racism
Both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr were civil right leaders who were well respected for their ideas. However, they had differences that would impact the success of their initiatives. Malcolm X had superior solutions for a strong centralized black community and a stable black economy, while King’s ideas made more sense in terms of his nonviolent philosophy and push for an integrated education system. Whiles Martin Luther King, Jr’s idea about blacks and whites together would work in a perfect society,America was far from a perfect society in the 1960s.
Philosophical differences between martin luther king and malcolm X The philosophical differences between Martin Luther King and Malcolm X have to do with the their protest strategies. MLK never fought with violence. Although he would get physically attacked, he stood his ground and continued to fight for equality peacefully. King believed that whites and blacks should come together to end the hate and violence.
In the end Martin Luther King's strategy worked better because of the fact that he wanted to do everything non-violently whereas Malcolm X wanted to use any means of violence to get what he wanted. Either know Martin Luther King
When you think about key people in Civil Rights, the names of both Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X probably both come to your head right away. They are two of the influential people in not just African-American history, but also American history in general. Even though they were fighting for the same reasons, they are very different people. Martin Luther King Jr. had some great methods when fighting against segregation, but his methods were extremely different from those of Malcolm X. Malcolm X’s ideas were very similar to King’s, but he took action in less peaceful way. Even though many people believe that King was more peaceful than Malcolm X, most historians will tell you that they were equally as powerful.
They disapproved of their race being mistreated by the whites, so they stood up for their people. By comparing and contrasting Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr., people can get information about the two and learn how they had similar goals. An examination of the similarities and differences between the two is that they gave great speeches about their thoughts on segregation and how they wanted their people to have a fair life in society. However, they both have different tactics to get their freedom of being treated fairly.
Martin Luther King Jr's and Malcolm X's methods have a few simularities and a few differences. The issue focused on the Negro community struggled with boycott and violence. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X wanted their community to be saved. In this essay, I will be talking about the differences and simularities of the methods use to improve the economic conditions of African Americans. Even so, the Martin Luther King Jr's method was to emphasize a nonviolent arsenal and use the march as a "weapon" and try to stop violnce.
First of all, although they both were leader of civil right movements, yet they both had a different approach to win those civil rights. Martin Luther King remained a peaceful person throughout his life. He used to hate violence, and always recommended the amicable ways to achieve his goals. Apparently, he appeared to be inspired by the Gandhi, the founder of the India, who also used non-violent ways in order to make his mission successful. On the other hand, Malcolm X believed in adopting aggressive attitude when it becomes necessary.
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were two influential men who served as important figures for the Civil Rights Movement. The two men came from diverse backgrounds and had contrasting views in life about religion and African American’s stance in society. Malcolm X was born in Nebraska and had great amounts of exposure to racism. Martin Luther King was born in an educated family in Atlanta, where he experienced racism, but to a lower extreme than Malcolm X. Although they passed away long time ago, they continue to live on today in a world independent of segregation. Martin Luther King and Malcolm X used opposing principles to achieve equality for blacks; King utilized integration of both races and nonviolence as opposed to Malcolm X who separated the same races and employed non violence so as to achieve the same goal.
The men had contrasting ideas when it came to fighting for racial equality. Martin Luther King’s philosophies made more sense than Malcolm X’s philosophies, because King believed in working together and nonviolence protests to change the minds of the white society. Where Malcolm X believed in working separately to gain independence for the black communities, so
Malcolm X grew up in a much lesser community. His neighborhood was violent and there wasn’t much schooling. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, throughout his entire lifetime and believed using nonviolent forms of protest. King would even condone being nonviolent when he was hurt physically. Malcolm X used whatever form of protest he needed to get the job done and
All though they shared a common goal, the two represented two different philosophies. Martin believed racial equality ought to be brought to the USA by non-violent means. On the other hand, Malcolm X believed racial equality ought to be brought
His tone also rises in tone to emphasize calls to action and explanations of the problem. The difference between Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. when it comes to religious and racial problems is that Malcolm X believes that the people need to rise up and take action, using violence if necessary. King Jr. however, believes in changing
Martin Luther King’s philosophy made more sense for America in the 1960s because it pushed America forward, it stopped bloodshed through nonviolence, and it helped make everyone more equal and together by showing them the errors of their ways. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seemed to have a respect among one another, though their philosophies were quite different from each other. Malcolm X made it clear that he believed that the African Americans and the White people should remain separate but should be considered equal to each other. He told white people “work in conjunction with us-each of us working among our own kind.” Martin Luther King Jr., on the other hand, preached equality and desegregation.
