More handpicked essays just for you.
Malcolm x philosophy dbq essay
The philosophies of martin luther king and malcolm x
Perspectives of malcolm x
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Malcolm X and Martin Luther KIng Jr are both very critical parts in the fight for social and economic justice for african americans in the 60s though both of these men fought for the same things they had different ways of thinking and different strategies that they used to get this economic and social justice/eqaulity. Martin Luther KIng Jr and Malcolm X were both very smart men with great ideas that helped african americans take a step closer to getting the eqaulity they deserved economically and socially. Martin Luther King Jr was a well known african american civil rights activist in the 60s that voiced his opinion and ideas in order to make a change. Martin Luther King Jr had many stratigies when it came to getting what he wanted and what he wanted more than anything at the time was a equal economic status for african americans. At this time in the 60s african
In the end, even though both Malcolm X and Martin Luther King both have a similar goals,they both have diffrent way of achieving them. Malcolm X uses repetition to to bluntly state his purposes and to point out issues. Martin Luther King Uses parallel structure to refute what the clergymen had to say about the actions of the blacks and labeling him an extremist. Yet even though both malcolm X and Martin Luther king did use rhetorical question, they used it to serve different purposes. Malcolm X used it to get the audience thinking on what they should do next and how they did not accomplish anything, while Martin Luther King used it to question the Clergymen's way of thinking and to ask where the white christians were at when blacks were being
In both sections of Document 2, many readers begin to realize that activists, such as King and Malcom X, wanted to make sure that Civil Rights movements was not only positive towards society, but was also handled accordingly in order for African Americans to become equal within society. However, Dr. King and Malcolm X demonstrated their difference in thoughts upon how the Civil Rights movements should be incorporated within society, especially when it came to violence. Document 2 demonstrates how both Dr. King and Malcolm X viewed their ideas of violence and how it contributed not only to their work within the movements, but also to the general historical aspect of society as we know it today. Dr King believed that the best way to contribute to the Civil Rights movement was to address the issue in a nonviolent manner. This manner included nonviolent aspects such as sit ins and marches in order to demonstrate a way of negotiating with the leaders within the world while also proclaiming the need for equality.
By now everyone knows who Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr is, but not everyone knows what led up to them both being the civil rights leaders that they are. Malcolm X was one of the civil rights leaders who believed in making businesses for black people, whereas Martin Luther King Jr wanted to make white people give black people jobs in their businesses. These two would start a big war about whether or not black people should join white businesses or if they should make their own and leave white businesses alone.
Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X wanted to improve the lives of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. wanted to use an aggressive approach, but Malcolm X wanted to use his words to get through to his community. Although neither of them agreed with the other's ideas and goals, they both wanted to fight for the same reason, African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr. was always against violence, and he thought using a nonviolent arsenal weapon, like boycotting, and believed it would help create peace with all races. The text says, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott."
In both Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X's Civil Rights speeches, there were critical points hit in both of these speeches about African American employment. These two speeches are very important when talking about African American employment because both of them developed two very effective, but different methods for obtaining civil rights and employment for African Americans. With these two speeches MLK and Malcolm X were planning to make it fair for African Americans to get the same employment amount as everyone else. These two leaders had the same goals for these speeches, but very different reasoning and methods for obtaining those goals. Both Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X had the same target in their sights for these speeches,
Two of the most significant individuals are Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. During the American civil rights movement. Although the two leaders had distinct ways of combating structural racism and injustice, King's theory ultimately prevails over Malcolm X's. The references discussed why King's perspective is superior to Malcolm X's, especially in terms of bringing about long-lasting change. The two leaders' approaches to nonviolence were one of their most significant distinctions.
Kai Woods 1/13/22 MLK and Malcolm X Martin Luther King Jr and Malcolm X were two influential figures in the civil rights movement, who made names for themselves while campaigning for their rights and their people's rights. However, despite their similar goals oriented around facing discrimination, the way they tried to achieve their goals and their ideologies differed. Martin Luther King believed in non-violence and peaceful protest, staging many set-ins and walks, most notable being the March on Washington, where he delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. King was also a devout Christian who incorporated his religion into his pleas for equality, which inevitably made his claims seem justifiable to the American people- King knew his audience and how to appeal, being an incredible public speaker and an activist that never stopped looking to the future. It’s not to say that King didn’t have his hardships- after all, he was a black man in the 20th century that actively disregarded what white folks said about him, and he was never silenced.
The most important decision of a leader is the style of leading they decide to use when inspiring others, or providing a vision for the future. By looking at the past, it is proven that some leadership styles are guaranteed to be more effective than others. The leadership style of Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X during the Civil Rights provides significant evidence of how different styles of leading can turn out to be a major success or defeat. Malcolm X’s leadership style included using violence to protest against violence and unequal rights, as well as supporting the segregation of African Americans and the whites. Martin Luther King’s style included nonviolent marches and protests against violence, and peacefully fighting for integrating the blacks and whites.
MLK wants to protest and boycott, while Malcolm wants to go head-on and compete with the other businesses through legitimate needs. During MLK's speech, he mentions, "Along with the march as a weapon for change in our nonviolent arsenal must be listed the boycott. " It shows that Martin Luther King, Jr wants to force white businessmen to hire black men and women by not buying their goods. From Malcolm's eyes he states, "So that they won't have to constantly be involved in picketing and boycotting other people in other communities in order to get a job." Malcolm X does not want to sort things out between the two races with rash and quick-witted decisions.
Martin Luther King Jr said,“We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools”. In the late 1960s, racial tension was high, African Americans were not given the right to vote, the right to a fair education, and the right to a fair judgement. This then led to the separation of schools and the destruction of a normal livelihood. Dr.King and Malcolm X, two men in the face of oppression rose up to challenge the racial barrier, thus changing the world forever. Although Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X seem to have mutual respect and an equal understanding of the inequality, their philosophies were quite different from each other.
The fight for equality has been a long and complicated battle. Many people believe that Martin Luther King, Jr. was correct in his approach, but others believe that Malcolm X’s approach was best. Malcolm X believed in the goal of black people separating completely from white people using the method of violence in self-defense. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in the method of reaching equality through desegregation using the method of nonviolent resistance. Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr. believed in very different viewpoints regarding the solution to the needs of and problems facing the African-American community in the 1960s, but King’s approach was best.
In order to demonstrate the viability of nonviolent forms of social protests, Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. wrote and spoke many inspiring works and speeches that helped uplift the
Peaceful resistance to laws is positive for a free society. Take the opposite of peaceful resistance: violence. If a law is thought to be oppressive, violent resistance to it accomplishes nothing good. Violence is not conducive at all for a free society; there is already too much violence elsewhere. Violence begets violence, which leads to chaos.
During the civil rights movement of the 1950’s, there were three general attitudes about black rights that became prevalent in the African-American communities, the ideas presented by Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, and the ideas of the Black Panthers. Summed up short, Martin Luther King based all of his ideas on his “I Have A Dream Speech,” and the ideas of peace, from Mahatma Gandhi. While MLK Jr. supported the ideas of peace, Malcolm X and the Black Panthers both took opposite approaches- they believed their protests must be done with force. The ideas of the three are all different in their view points toward gaining civil rights for the African-American population of the United States.
