Athletic Director Bob Marcus has quite the challenge in allocating the athletic department funds appropriately throughout all the programs within Oakbend Senior High School. After critically analyzing the case study it was quite clear some sports such as football and girls basketball received much more funding compared to other sports such as cross country and track and field. Throughout this case brief an effective solution that is both fair and in line with the districts mission will be expanded on to assist Bob Marcus is making the necessary budget cuts to provide a successful athletic program in the future. Marcus needs to cut about $80,000 from the previous budget plan to accommodate the funding cuts made by the school.
Millions of people follow college athletics. From elementary kids to adults, people around the world follow these sports. The athletes are becoming faster, bigger, stronger, and more athletic. It is because of these athletes that schools see an increase in revenue. Apparel sales, money generated from camps, tickets are sold out.
Reports show the expense costs have already been increasing faster than revenues coming in. College sports teams’ revenues have increased by 83 percent in the last ten years, but these reports also show that expenses have increased faster amounting to 115 percent during the same time period (Sanderson and Siegfried 119). So, although it may seem like college sports generate a lot of revenue for these schools, they also create a lot of expenses. This is the case for the majority of schools, “Out of 340 Division I schools, only 23 athletic departments generate enough revenue to cover their expenses… 317 schools are in debt because of athletics” (Widener). Paying student-athletes would not fix these debt issues but only make them worse.
Unequal Funding for High School Sports High school sports are a very important part of our school, promoting not only good physical health, but encouraging athletes to find success in other areas of their life as well. As a school, we should want our sports teams to push to be the best they can be, which leads to the question how will our sports teams improve if they all aren’t funded equally? Unequal funding for our sports teams today is unfair because no sport is more or less important than the other, funding for the sports shouldn’t depend on the popularity of the sport, sports with better equipment are able to perform better, and those without good equipment are set up for failure, and giving less money to some sports tells the athletes
The text also states that schools should charge students for sports and give them what they need most for school. It happens already in some schools where the sports program has lots of money put towards it, and other aspects of books and other supplies get left
Those sports are billion-dollar businesses, so many people say it 's unfair that the players don 't get part of the profits”(Scholastic News). Where does this money these colleges are making go ? How much of it really goes back toward athletics ? These are questions many people are asking, but not many truly knows. What we do know is, the money will not be in the hands of the athletes.
The athletes are some of the greatest assets to the universities, and make the NCAA large amounts of
With this in mind, the thought of compensating all athletes would not be in the best interest of the universities. It would be difficult to establish fair compensation for all sports and to draw the line for which athletes should be paid. The University of Connecticut’s women’s basketball team, the most successful women’s basketball program in NCAA history, lost over seven hundred thousand dollars in 2010 (Lewis 2). Just like with this university, for many universities, the profit made on football and men’s basketball are needed to help support and pay for all other
These schools also spend six times as much money per athlete than for students. This is not fair to students that are paying to attend a certain university because they are not receiving the full value and benefits that school could offer. Although some people argue that sports bring in donations from boosters and increased applications, cutting just a fraction of the costs of sports would free up thousands of dollars that could be put back into scholarships for students, reducing student
Furthermore "NCAA data shows that only 16.2 percent of the spending at Division 1 schools goes to student aid and the rest goes to salaries, game expenses and facilities" (Mitchell). This type of data shows how the priorities of the players have nothing to do with serving them, but more so improving services to win games that bring in revenue. Lastly, at Northern Kentucky University they couldn't afford a new house center for the nursing program, but they were able to expand to Division 1 sports.
In this heated debate all the reasons why we need to pay college athletes were highlighted. We cannot ignore this issue any longer; too many student athletes are suffering. As discussed in the YouTube special, the universities are tarnishing the only compensation college athletes do receive; therefore, paying student athletes is a necessity. First, the main objective of college athletics is to provide a quality education to the student athletes, yet there have been countless situations in which the university has failed to do so.
Introduction In the realm of collegiate athletes, a constant debate surrounds the allocation of financial resources between a university’s revenue and non-revenue sports. At every college and university, the financial distribution between revenue and non-revenue sports is much more complex than how much money each team gets. Other factors that are taken into consideration when making these multi-million dollar decisions include scholarship allocation, academic success, facility needs, and equipment needs for each program. Some will argue for a more equitable approach to the distribution of funds, while others advocate for athletic departments to prioritize revenue-generating sports to sustain the financial viability of athletic programs. Arguments For Equitable Distribution of Funds Advocates for the equitable distribution of funds argue that all sports
High School Sports Should be Funded Every year 300,000 students are participating in sports (Gould 1). The School District has been funding the athletics program, which has been benefiting many of the students’ lives for several years. The discontinuation of high school sports will cause many students to loose the health, social and educational benefits provided by participating in athletics. The School District should continue to fund sports because they benefit students.
Paying College Athletes This essay I’m going to talk about paying college athletes and why we should pay them a little bit of money. I think we should pay college athletes a little bit of money. I have some facts and reasons why we should to back up reason why we should. Here are my facts and reasons to support my opinion about this topic.
This is a major reason why colleges should highly support their athletic teams with school spirit. People are constantly watching college sports every day, leading to more and more money coming in. They are able to spend this revenue on their students and
