This specific system of government is described by the 21st Century American Government and Politics textbook as, “The allocation of powers and responsibilities among national, state, and local governments and the intergovernmental relations between them.” When deciding whether the Framers intended for federal or state governments to be supreme in the federal system, a divided answer among the Founders surfaces. If one was to present this question to Alexander Hamilton and his fellow Federalists, he would undoubtedly express his support for a strong federal government. Conversely, Thomas Jefferson and the anti-federalists were in favor of state government supremacy in the federal system and even resented the ratification of the Constitution.
When the new constitution was put into effect in 1789, the federal government was actually given power and had more of a say in society. The constitution gave the federal government powers, and limited that states’ powers. There are two amendments in the constitution that explains what the federal and state governments have the right to do. The tenth and the fourteenth amendment lay down the line for what the states can do and not do. Even though the federal government tells them what to do through the constitution, they give them rights as well.
Under the Constitution, states and the government both have different duties and both shared large responsibilities. When events such as Shay’s Rebellion occurred, the lack of national power prevented quick and efficient responses to problems in the nation. These issues highlighted the inefficiency of the Articles of Confederation and the need for a national army that could quickly resolve issues. Each state was dealing with its own problems and searching for its own solutions. As Abraham Lincoln later said, “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”
a clash between the federal government and
Read this excerpt from James Madison's Federalist No. 45 and answer the questions. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State. The operations of the federal government will be most extensive and important in times of war and danger; those of the State governments, in times of peace and security. As the former periods will probably bear a small proportion to the latter, the State governments will here enjoy another advantage over the federal government.
When the United States of America began to fight the Revolutionary War in 1775, they would need a governing body to run the new country. However, seeing as they had just escaped from a tyrannical government under England, the Articles of Confederation gave the states a very large amount of power so that they would not have the same problem again. However, although this government gave many states what they wanted, it was not strong enough to run a country. So, when writing a new Constitution the founding fathers gave more power to the federal government than the states because of the former government.
After the American Revolution, slavery grew into a coherent, national system. The new nation accepted and supported its presence. The Constitution explained how the federal government was to be set up and operate, but the protection of health, safety, and morals were left up to the individual states to decide. Each state was to draft its own constitution, in which it could decide whether it wanted to allow slavery within its its borders. Various abolitionists prepared editorials in hopes of bringing the issue of slavery to the forefront of public discourse.
Hamad yousef May 9 /2018 Homework 4: The US constitution gives only certain powers to the federal government while the rest of the authority lies with the state governments. In case of the clash between the federal and state laws, the federal law prevails. However, in case of a clash between the federal and state governments, the result can be a deadlock.
That quote explains how the national government have more power than the states. The federalist also supported business and banking, they were financially stable. The federalist also wanted to abolish slavery. “It
States also wondered what type of government should there be, a strong central government or a less federal government. Each state had
This country was founded with the attempt to separate the federal government and the state government, known as federalism. The goal of federalism is to divide the power of state and federal governments, protect the rights of the state, and prevent tyranny of the majority. Throughout the years, federalism turned into dual federalism where the state and federal government were completely independent of each other and only shared a dependency on the Constitution. The united states suppressing now to cooperative federalism, the national government has assumed even more power, overruling the states with Supreme Court decisions and actions, and executive Orders. Furthermore, the Federal government should grant their state governments more power, due to the connection the state governments hold with their local people.
Question 3: “Federalist or Antifederalist? Pick one (or neither) and then defend your position.” Answer: After the passage of the Constitution in 1787, a fierce debate erupted between those who support a strong, national government, known as the Federalists, and those who opposed the creation of a central government that would have more power than the states, known as the Anti-Federalists. I chose the Federalist, and here’s why: In the Anti-Federalist view, the creation of a strong, national government would seem unreasonable.
Slavery had a lot of complication when dealing with the national and state governments. When we go back to the Declaration of Independence we will notice the great emphasis on equality however this was not a national concept given to all. Slavery was a very controversial issue between the Northern and Southern States and what the Declaration of Independence stood for. While in the Northern part of the nation argued that Slavery was unconstitutional the Southern States fought to say that slaves were not considered people but material possessions
Despite the strict sanctions placed to curb it, drunk driving continues to be an unwavering predicament in most states. The number of offenders taken to custody by the police is rising by the day; with matters being made worse by the escalating number of underage drinkers. Many solutions have been put forth in an effort to reduce drunk driving and consequently reduce the number of road carnages. The persistence of the problem however calls for improved solutions. This paper forms a discussion on drunk driving and current prevention strategies; and proposes solutions to the unrelenting problem.
