Compare And Contrast The Battle Of The Bulge And Dunkirk

1020 Words5 Pages

Battle of the bulge/Dunkirk
The battle resulted in a disaster defeat for Nazi Germany. Less than four months later, World War II in Europe was over. Caught off guard, American units fought desperate battles to stem the German advances at St.vith, Elsenborn Ridge, Houffalize, and Bastogne. The battle of the bulge was a major German offensive campaign launched through the densely forested Ardennes region of Wallonia in Belgium, France, and Luxemburg on the western front toward the end of World War II. The battle of the bulge started in December,1944. Dec. 16 at 5:30a.m German had over 250,000 troops along the Siegfried line. On December 16, 8 panzer divisions broke through week allied defenses on a 70 mile front. The attack was a total surprise, and they achieved astonishing success (Lopez). …show more content…

Hitler was planning a counteroffensive. Military logic said that Hitler should pull back to Rhine. Germany paid terrible over 30,000 people killed, over 40,000 wounded and over 40,000 prisoners, and thousand of tanks destroyed. The U.S had 600,000 men came in the battle and 20,000 of them were killed, 40,000 wounded and 20,000 prisoners. The battle of the bulge was also knows as battle of the Ardennes on Dec.16,1944.Germany penetrated deep into Belgium creating the bulgier a dent and that is how it got its name. In late 1944, in the wake of the allied forces successful D-day invasion of Normandy France, It seemed if the second world war was all but over but was just the begin. As the Germans drove deeper into the Ardennes in an attempt to secure vital bridgeheads, the allied line took a large bulge, giving rise to the Battles name(Battle of the