After comparing and contrasting the judicial selection processes of Texas and Arizona it is obvious that those two systems are very different. Both approaches has its advantages and weak sides. Judging from the above findings the efficiency of one and another selection method could be identified.
The partisan elections of Texas allow statewide public elections when the voters make their own choice. It reduces the influence of the legislative over the judicial power and minimizes the cases of candidate withdrawals which make this system more democratic. But there are issues which cause some difficulties as the judicial election campaigns are financially wasteful. In most cases the voters are not well-informed about the personality and professional