Compare And Contrast What You Eat Is Your Business And Don T Blame The Eater

927 Words4 Pages

Two well-known authors both have their own viewpoints on nutritional health, but they, metaphorically, may as well live on different planets. Radley Balko is the author of “What You Eat Is Your Business”, which explains that the government is taking too much responsibility away from the public; which is making it too easy on them, as the people hold a very slim amount of accountability over what they’re eating. On the complete flip-side, David Zinczenko, author of “Don’t Blame the Eater”, explains that there is not enough governmental interference, and that they should step in more. He believes that it isn’t only the people’s fault that they are unaware of what they’re consuming. However, no matter who accepts responsibility, they both agree …show more content…

David Zinczenko expresses his concern that in a grocery store, every item of food is labeled with the proper nutritional facts to show the consumer its health benefits or disadvantages. However, at fast food restaurants, David mentions, these nutritional facts are either not shown or are highly inaccurate. These could be extremely beneficial to the general public, but they’re not helpful if they’re not discernable. To prevent this, one would think that the easy fix is to choose more sustainable foods such as fruits and vegetables from local farmers markets. However, Radley and David both agree that unfortunately, fast food chain restaurants are much more convenient than a farmers market. Radley Balko, on a similar note, mentions that the people should care about what they’re putting into their bodies, but that they have no incentive to. If the government is paying for their (obesity-related) medications, then they have no reason to change their eating habits or their lifestyle choices. Radley indirectly states that the only way to ensure personal responsibility is for the government to demand the people to finance the consequences of their habits and choices. Radley Balko and David Zinczenko both believe that the people should pay more attention to what they’re …show more content…

Radley mentions the costs of everybody’s healthcare costs, ranging from premiums to general doctor visits, have gone up drastically; he goes as far as to say that it may affect what age he’s able to comfortably retire. On a similar note, David takes it a step further to mention that from 1969 to 2002, diabetes treatments have jumped nearly 97.4 billion dollars; and that isn’t including other health-related conditions. Even if some people pay attention to what they’re intaking, they’re still suffering financially at the fault of the ones who don’t. The two authors can undeniably agree that the rise in this cost is a direct consequence of the people’s eating habits and lifestyle