Comparing Daoism's Views On Good And Evil

868 Words4 Pages

Question 1
The philosophy of Confucius is predominantly a political and moral one. What the philosophy believes is that the earth coexists in equal strength and harmony maintaining a perpetual dynamism. Daoism escapes from the human tendency to of humanist philosophy and subjects its definition to the totality of all existence. Legalism philosophy beliefs about metaphysical reality state that human beings are inherently selfish which make them bad. No one will sacrifice for the sake of others unless one is forced. It is the best interest of one person to kill the other.
Question 2
Confucianism indicates that people do bad or evil because morality is embedded in the universe. This means that all things come from the essential nature. When person things about the evil he/she produces evil. Daoism explanation on why humans do bad or evil is that is a mental and physical manifestation. It explains that evil belongs to nature and so humans have to pledge to the universal balance and respect the two polarities. Concerning human doing bad and evil, legalism …show more content…

This philosophy argues that there is need to have military prowess based on moral virtue. The moral character of the military is to listen to the ruler thus creating a harmonious society. By military activities and services, Daoism philosophy argues that an active military is an important tool in human relationships, but it has to have resorted to a conduct of warfare. There is need to have a moral influence creating harmony. Legalism philosophy dictates that the president becomes the commander in chief of the armed forces making him/her a military commander. The president is entitled to make treaties and direct the military, consent regarding appointments, ratify treaties and declare war. The military shall observe a strict adherence to the rule of law and the commands of the commander in