ipl-logo

Comparing Dialogue In Phaedrus And Jesus's Synoptic Gospel

560 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Greek and roman religion essay

Throughout the chapter, Peter elaborates a theory of dialogue and dissemination as two distinct types of communication. Dialogue consists of a love and soul-to soul conversation between mutually present speakers, whereas dissemination involves the indiscriminate scattering of the messages (46). To illustrate the difference between the two conception of communication, Peter compares the communicative style of Socrates in Plato’s Phaedrus and Jesus’s parable of the sower in the synoptic gospel. Socrates serves as a model of dialogue, while Jesus serves as a model of dissemination. Socrates believed that dialogue is the preferred human state of communication where each individual contributes equally to the conversation in an intimate setting of dialectic and ‘reciprocity and interaction’ (33) are central in the exchange of communication. Peter describes Socrates ideal of communication dialogue, as ‘souls …show more content…

Dissemination can be compared to an encoding and decoding model where messages sent are open for interpretation; the meaning of the message depends on the receiver’s capacity of understanding (51). With dissemination as a communication model messages are broadcasted indiscriminately (46), and can be heard by anyone (51). Jesus model of dissemination is viewed as an inferior communication method that is inefficient and a wasteful scatter of messages (52). Peter argues however that one-way communication is not necessarily bad, comparing it to reciprocity that can become violent, destructive but also fair (56) (Morris, Jan 16). Jesus views dissemination as unbiased towards generosity and kindness where love, or agape, is extensively available to all and not just a few that are accessible to the message (56). Dissemination is non-reciprocal and has no expectations of

Show More
Related
832 Words | 4 Pages

Author Tannen begins with details behind communication misconceptions, which leads with indirectness. The book was written to provide knowledge on communication to defeat the common barriers in everyday life. She states in the beginning there are two major ways communication tends to advance, smooth or choppy. You meet someone for the first time and conversation continues to flow with lack of effort, or you meet someone and the conversation takes great effort and goes nowhere. The book was written to determine the reasoning behind each.

Read More
388 Words | 2 Pages

Moreover, in the second part of this book, Litfin applies the principles of rhetoric to 1 Corinthians 1-4. In accordance with the opinion of the author, this portion of Scripture stands as the only place where one can find the use of a “theology of preaching” in Paul’s writing, for the reason that rhetoric was too pervasive in the first century. However, though Paul did not know much about rhetoric, Litfin concedes that this is not a reason to avoid scholar to sit in judgment over him. Along these lines, they judge him to the same extent as any Greco-Roman orator.

Read More
495 Words | 2 Pages

Think Question #1 Sydney Martin CMN 225: Communication in Place September, 19th, 2015 Innovation is a natural part of human society, without it the human species wouldn’t be where it is today. But, in order for an innovation to make a significant impact on society the innovation must be spread throughout the many different cultures and societies on earth. Everett Rogers and Malcolm Gladwell both studied they way innovations are spread. The theories while, forty years apart, essentially the same. Rogers defined diffusion as “…the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among members of a social system…”

Read More
1220 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout the debate, Socrates seizes his knowledge of rhetoric and uses it against Gorgias. His understanding of rhetorical appeals and devices allows him to conspire a plan to trap Gorgias in his own contradictions. Through the use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos, Socrates adequately

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

In this play the Socrates here doesn't sound like the Socrates from the Apology or the real life Socrates. The real Socrates doesn't actually teach per say, he teaches in a way that makes you yourself use your brain. He makes you question everything and understand things based on your own perception. The writer of this play clearly felt as if Socrates was a major problem in his society for allowing people to actually try to think outside of the box and ask questions. He most likely enjoyed the fact that everyone were robots and all thought alike and believed in the same thing because it brought no need to bring out discussion.

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

Socrates attests that rhetoric does the same to the soul as cookery does to the

Read More
1280 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates & Snowden Socrates was a true believer that true pleasure only comes when individuals live a moral life. He believed that an individual’s inner life, or the soul, is the most important part of life. Each person must keep his or her soul healthy, by seeking truth, self-knowledge, justice, and goodness. Socrates believed that any soul in search of fame, wealth, and power becomes ignorant, sickly, and weak (Claudia, 270). He was concerned with strengthening his inner self by examining and criticizing it.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

A man being executed for simply having different beliefs from his society is quite shocking in this current time period, though the Trial of Socrates depicts just that. In analyzing the Apology and Crito it is important to applaud and recognize how Plato’s use of rhetorical devices depict the law system of Athens in a negative light. In the Crito, Socrates states that he is choosing to die because he does not want to undermine the laws of Athens by fleeing, since he believes that the laws are just even if his sentence is not. Nevertheless, through using ethos to establish Socrates’ moral authority in the Apology and Crito, Plato leads his reader to draw the opposite conclusion about the Athenian judicial system. Leading the reader to question

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Socrates, through the mouthpiece

Read More
642 Words | 3 Pages

our whole debate my team believed that urban sprawl should be regulated. On the other hand our opponents were against that fact. Overall both debate teams had strong logica facts and sources to back up what they had to say but i believed that we had a stronger argument. THere main arguments against urban sprawl being regulated was that crime rates are lower with urban sprawl and there are more amenities with urban sprawl. My team for urban sprawl regulations believed that without regulations there would be more pollution and we would lose land that is very valuable to our agriculture which wouldn't be good do to our increasing population.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

If the term “dialectic” maintains always its initial meaning of communing, the best way to place Socrates’ role in the thought of Kierkegaard is to regard the frame of dialectic as dialectic-dialogue. Socrates, using the dialectic art, managed to reverse the foundations of a question, to shift from one meaning to another, to highlight ambiguities where meanings appeared originally to be clear and obvious. In other words, the kind of dialogue that leads to aporia. Under the various categories of thought of Socrates, as these appeared through his oral speech and through the moral values that sealed his life, the main attribute of a philosopher should be sought in the conscious innocence of the questions he poses. Socrates admits that he does not know.

Read More
1574 Words | 7 Pages

Other forms of communication also appear, such as Vashti’s monologue-like lectures. The various forms of communication are similar in the way that they usually end abruptly and unharmoniously. The unresolved

Read More
336 Words | 2 Pages

In the bible there are only these four books that tell the same story. These gospels all say that it has been mentioned in the Old Testament. Before we get into it, what does gospel mean? The word comes from a Greek word euangelion, which means “good news”. It is said throughout these fours books to believe the good news of Jesus.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

I will discuss Paul 's radical encounter with Christ, and how it ties into the ministry of an Apostle. My third and last point will be titled ' ' Life in Christ ' '. This is the part of the

Read More
1011 Words | 5 Pages

Communicators… discover meaning from the context in which a message is delivered” (Adler & Elmhorst, 2008). In the movie, Ian represents to a straight-talking style reflecting

Read More

More about Comparing Dialogue In Phaedrus And Jesus's Synoptic Gospel

Related Topics

Open Document