Comparing Dyaspora 'And Crick, Crack'

968 Words4 Pages

As both authors indirectly argue in their essay’s “Dyaspora” and “Crick, Crack,” race is a misconception that affects our lives the minute we are brought into the world. Furthermore, an effect of race is the desire to be accepted by the dominant culture. The word “dyaspora” is used to describe scattered people living in two worlds, their place of origin and their adopted land. There is one flaw that lies within dyaspora itself: the automatic disconnection you face from the dominant culture. In America, the close-minded dominant groups in society view cultural acceptance through ignorance. Society is oblivious to racial colonization because reality proves acceptance is only seen “skin deep.” Cultural acceptance has become a socially constructed …show more content…

“The boundaries of racial acceptance lie within “skin color and other physical attributes and in some respects most superficial indicators (Omni, Winant, 74). As Hyppolite reflects on her experience, she states “After you and others who looked like you came, they gradually disappeared to other places, leaving you this place and calling it bad because you and others like you live there now.” Whites did not want there to be a misinterpreted racial classification between them and those who look different than they. Regardless of your biological race, if you look different than whites, you are automatically inferior to them. Regardless of your biological race, if you look different than whites, you automatically possess bad qualities. And regardless of your biological race, if you look different than whites, they will not accept you. The reality of this oppression is that race is only seen through physical …show more content…

Not only did being “dyaspora” disconnect her from another culture, but also from the realization of “the connections and disconnections that have made you the mosaic that you are (Hyppolite, 86).” She took her own identity for granted “because it is taken for granted by the dominant culture (Daniel- Tatum, 93).” But, how can others accept you for who you are if you do not accept yourself first? The author was so concerned with being connected to the dominant culture, that it hindered her own acceptance of her Haitian