Comparing Jung's Theories And Belief

Jung’s theories vary, some of them are true and some of them are hard to believe, even though they have some truth to them, they are not 100% true. For example, according to Thomason “To Jung the Indians he met appeared to be tranquil and dignified, which Jung attributed to their belief that (as Mountain Lake explained) through their religious practice, they helped the sun cross the sky every day. Jung believed this belief and practice served the function of making the Indians' lives cosmologically meaningful.” But even though Jung believed this was true, humans cannot make or help the sun cross the sky. However, Jung’s theory on archetypes says that people are born hardwire which some people can agree to it “But what is the archetype? An innate

Yes, sometimes people should think with their feelings and think about one another, but at the same time there is a reason why people say “think with your head” instead of “think with your feelings”. Now days there is no such thing as gods, we do not make self-sacrifices, and we do not sacrifice others; when a tropical storm comes we do not dance outside to pray to the rain god, instead we actually think with our heads and do things rationally. In the other hand, the archetype theory is more realistic and/or believable, the parents have a lot to do on a child’s life even when unborn; if a kid have good parents he or she typically will be a good person, professional, and with a good future, but if the parents are not a good influence, the child will not fall far from the tree. Kids inherit things from their parents and personality is one of them; kids tend to be like their parents whether that’s a good or bad thing. So, the archetype are real in a way, kids are born hardwired, but not to the extent on which they will be something specific more like a path to what they will be in the