ipl-logo

Comparing Mark Antony And Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

729 Words3 Pages

The famous historical story of Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare tells the story of Julius Caesar, the most powerful ruler of Rome. Caesar was a well liked ruler and was becoming more liked by the people of Rome except for a few senators who thought that his power was getting out of hand. Later in the story, Caesar was violently murdered by multiple Senators who wanted his power. One of Caesar 's piers, Mark Antony was very upset when Caesar died and spoke his feelings in a speech, his speech about Caesar went along with with a speech from Brutus who was one of the Senators who killed Caesar. The two speeches had very similar topics but used very different techniques to get the crowd engaged. Mark Antony was very emotional during his speech and Brutus showed barely any emotion. At one point during his speech, Antony had to turn around and get himself to stop crying before continuing on with his speech as is displayed in this quote: “My heart is in …show more content…

Both Antony and Brutus paced their speeches differently which changed the timing of the speech and made it harder to interject with Brutus and easier to interject with Antony. The opportunity to interrupt the speaker during the speech gives the listeners the ability to change the direction of the speech and that definitely happened during Antony’s speech. He used restraint to get the crowd to pay attention and it worked. He changed his tone and changed the mood of the speech which kept the crowd interested and gave them something to follow. The crowd begged to hear Caesar 's will, when Antony announced that he had it. Antony refused to read the will, but when he found out from people’s comments on his decision during the speech and that they cared so much and wanted to hear it, he considered it and then described why it would be unfair to Caesar to read his personal will. Both speeches were paced differently and both allowed for slight interjections which were proven to cause a big impact on the

Show More
Related

Mark Antony's Use Of Rhetorical Strategies In Julius Caesar

937 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to murder, the culprit almost always rationalizes his or her actions to make them seem innocent in the situation. The murderer usually rationalizes their actions by using the victim's characteristics and using that to measure the value of the victim's life. In the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, Brutus and others decide to kill Caesar to protect the citizens of their home for they fear Caesar and his “ambition” would enslave the people of Rome. After they murder Caesar, Brutus speaks to the people to explain his actions and Mark Antony, one of Caesar's close companions, speaks on Caesar's behalf. Mark Antony was able to use rhetorical strategies better than Brutus in his speech in order to gain a level of

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

833 Words | 4 Pages

By refusing to read the will several times and admitting that what it contains will cause the people to have such a great love for Caesar that knowing he is now dead will be unbearable, Antony ignites curiosity in the people and furthermore, a subconscious feeling of respect and graciousness toward Caesar. Basically, Antony uses Caesar’s will to convince the people that Caesar was a selfless, kind-hearted man and those who killed him should be ashamed and punished for killing an innocent man. Through Antony’s use of paralipsis, he is able to plant a seed of admiration for Caesar and one of hate for the conspirators in the hearts of the plebeians. In his speech to the citizens, Antony also asks many rhetorical questions to cause his audience to pause and reflect on how they really feel, or how Antony wants them to feel, about certain people and events that have recently become important. In one instance.

Read More

Use Of Pathos In Julius Caesar

671 Words | 3 Pages

In Antony’s speech to the people, he speaks about Caesar over his dead body. His words make the commoners feel something, as opposed to Brutus,

Read More

Brutus Caesar Pathos Analysis

660 Words | 3 Pages

Brutus and Antony use great points when it came to using pathos. Brutus used, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more." (Lines 20-21) He was saying that the reason why he killed Caesar is for Rome itself and not for the simple fact that he did not love his cousin, he still loved Caesar but loved Rome more. Antony said," When the poor have cried, Caesar has wept.”

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech

207 Words | 1 Pages

Mark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.

Read More

Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar

818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More

Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar

437 Words | 2 Pages

Antony uses pathos he communicates to the people in a way that Brutus did not. Since, Antony is not allowed to say anything bad at the funeral he discretely criticizes Brutus and Cassius because he feels that what they did was wrong. For example, when Antony makes a comment that is contrary to what he means, he says “But Brutus is an honourable man”. Antony uses a lot of pathos because he wants the citizens to feel the way he is feeling. For example, he says he wants to read them the letter but he does not want to make them weep because of how much Caesar loved them.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More

Antony's Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In Julius Caesar

949 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s Speech Using Rhetorical Appeals In William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, after Caesar’s death, the Romans are conflicted about what should be done. After Brutus’ speech the Romans are ready to crown Brutus king and be on the conspirators’ side. Though Brutus then leaves the crowd while Antony delivers his speech, the crowd realizes what should be done of Caesar’s murder and Antony prevents the conspirators from getting away with the murder of Caesar.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

Rhetoric in the Speeches of Brutus and Antony The death of Caesar is a controversial topic and was even more controversial at the time of his funeral when when senators were trying to benefit from his death by getting the Roman citizens on their side. At Caesar’s funeral, two senators gave speeches as an attempt to get the roman people on their side. Out of the two speeches, Marc Antony’s speech was more effective because of his use of appeals and biases, being 100% true and had a larger variety of rhetorical devices.

Read More

The Power Of Power In Julius Caesar

804 Words | 4 Pages

Antony’s manipulative behavior intensified during this scene as he attempted to persuade Brutus into allowing him to speak at Caesar’s funeral, which had major consequences later in the act. Another group that Marc Antony successfully persuaded was the citizens of Rome. After the citizens praised Brutus for his honorable speech, Marc Antony presented Caesar’s body to the crowd, revealing each fatal stab wound that shattered the beloved Caesar. Antony’s crying and speech about Caesar’s accomplishments appealed to the citizens’ sympathy, which later escalated into anger. He used his strength of public speaking to convince the crowd that his intentions were in their favor.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Brutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Marc Antony's Speech

617 Words | 3 Pages

Marc Antony gives his speech at Caesar’s funeral to the citizens of Rome. The purpose of his speech is to prove to the citizens that Brutus is wrong and Caesar shouldn’t have been killed. The tone of his speech is very ironic. It also gets very dramatic as he talks about Caesar being killed.

Read More

Brutus And Marc Antony's Speech In Julius Caesar

500 Words | 2 Pages

In William Shakespeare 's play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar two speeches one from Brutus a honorable , an a conspirator ,the second speech from antony Cesar 's best friend for the people of Rome .about Caesar 's death in act 3 scene 2. Brutus and Anthony try to sway the minds of the Roman toward their view ,Brutus tries to convince the Roman people that he had to do what 's best for Rome ,.that Caesar was murdered for A noble cause . Brutus and Marc Anthony funeral speech ,their personalities and characteristics were aposit is obvious in the speech . Caesar has just been murdered stabbed to death by his close friends , Brutus who loves him greatly the conspirators have bath their hands and arms on Caesars blood, and have the

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech

824 Words | 4 Pages

Julius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.

Read More

More about Comparing Mark Antony And Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document