ipl-logo

Comparing The Matrix And The Allegory Of The Cave

673 Words3 Pages

Reality is an abstract thought. The question has been raised, can a person be certain of reality or is it mealy and illusion? Is it possible to be certain of anything? These complex issues have been carefully examined by philosophers. Some question if a parallel or alternative world. The synopsis are presented, The Matrix, The Allegory of the Cave, and Meditation I of the Things of Which We May Doubt, each examine the possible that life is an illusion, furthermore that there is an alternative dimension or world. First, it is important to note that each synopsis was written in a different time period furthermore each was written for a different audience. The Matrix synopsis presents an argument that indeed life is an illusion. Humans are being controlled by a system. In The Matrix, Neo is …show more content…

It is possible to prove that the world is indeed a real place and not an illusion or dream. There are a variety of scientific and biblical arguments to back this up. Plato, and Descartes ponder knowledge of reality. These two do so in an abstract way. Socrates and Glaucon are two characters in Plato’s synopsis who discuss reality. Descartes questions each of the five sense; smell, sight, sound, taste, and touch in light of reality. His doubts are relayed to the reader. Affirming that the senses are capable of giving incorrect information thus reality could be perceived incorrectly. Each of these works were developed with a different purpose. Similarly, in a different time period and for a different audience. The Matrix and Plato both take into consideration that there could be two realities. In each the character’s desire to know the true reality. Plato focuses on the shadows in the cave which are trapped. Socrates compares these shadows to humans, “the shadows are as close as the prisoners get to the viewing of reality.” This is similar to how the government and media influences modern

Open Document