ipl-logo

Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

574 Words3 Pages

The early 1800’s in America was a time of growth and development. The US government wanted to secure the nation's thriving future with expanding their land.
According to The Cherokee Nation, In 1823 when the Supreme court made a decision that the Indians could occupy land in the United states, but later came into a issue, where Andrew Jackson wanted and persistently was pushing the Cherokees out of their land, and so were not able to keep their title to the land. Then in 1831 the Cherokee took the trail back to the Supreme court. But this time according to the appeal on the Law made in 1830 which prohibited whites from living on Indian territory after March 31, 1831, without a license from that state. So when with the Supreme Court they decided that the Cherokee did not have a right to keep and have their own government in their land, the Georgia extensions of the state's law to be agents the law.
From the Indian Removal Act you can see that Andrew Jackson different Values and beliefs than the CHerokees. Andrew Jackson valued American Progress and expansion, because he wanted and continuously was trying to remove the indians out of their land because he believed that they were obstacles to the american progress. Another thing Jackson valued is power and a high place in society, this is shown when he just decided to sign the …show more content…

This can be proved because even after Andrew Jackson went against the law, he still tried to fight back for his people so they can stay in their land and keep living heir normal lives like before. Major ridge and the Cherokee Indians also valued his rights that he has from the Supreme Court. This is shown also because when the Supreme Court gives him the land, and gives it to their title. He tries to stand to that title,and when Andrew JacksoN goes against the Supreme Court to try to take it and remove them from their land, he backs his best effort to try to save the land for the

Show More
Related
341 Words | 2 Pages

In 1830 Jackson requested a bill which went before Congress allowing them to move the Indians across the Mississippi. Daniel Webster and Henry Clay both went against the Indian Removal Bill, but its most bitterly outspoken opponent was Davy Crockett. Serving Jackson under the army, he was a Jacksonian Democrat until he and the president separated over the treatment of Indians. In the next Tennessee congressional election, the Democrats gave their support to another candidate, and so he was defeated. Repelled with prejudice, Crockett left for Texas, where he died defending the Alamo within a year.

Read More
170 Words | 1 Pages

The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

If he was really trying to help the Indians get their land back he would have not agreed that remcoing them benefits the Americans. In the treaty of New Echota it states.” That a sum not exceeding five million dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their land and possessions.” (Treaty of New Echota). Andrew Jackson also signed the New Echota Treaty so he wanted the removal

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

The westward expansion worked to the disadvantage of the Indians, while by rights Cherokee owned their land, meaning they were an independent nation from the state, this arrangement wasn’t respected by the state of Georgia, the state used the law to their advantage trying to took and control their land, they claimed since they were living in American ground their independence didn’t excluded them of the obligation to help the country, in this case giving, exchanging or/and selling their lands, the state as a respond to their negative the state wrote the Indian Removal Act of 1830 where as a result of their lands being in the state the Cherokee had to follow, in this act it was stated that “ … the President to exchange any or all of such districts,

Read More
148 Words | 1 Pages

Jackson’s Native American policies were very undemocratic because they decreased the power of the people. Document 9 states that the Native Americans have reasons to stay on their land, one being that the land west of the Arkansas Territory is unknown to them. Another is that the region is poorly supplied with food and water and that the new neighbors have different customs and a totally different language. Finally, they wish to remain on the land in which their ancestors died and where they were buried. The evidence helps explain that Andrew Jackson’s Native American policy was very undemocratic because the Native Americans had four very good reasons for staying on their homeland.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

this quote proves what General jackson did in fact flea the native indians. For example, in the text “America and florida” it states “Jackson takes the Spanish Forts as well as the fugitives. His action was well received by the American

Read More
201 Words | 1 Pages

One of the main reasons why Andrew Jackson wanted the Indians to be removed is because the Americans wanted the land that the Native Americans lived on for agriculture. Also Andrew Jackson believed the Native Americans lacked education & would influence the Americans if the Indians stayed. Georgia is where gold was first discovered & this made the Americans want the property where the Cherokees lived & forced to leave. Andrew Jacksons tone in the letter to the Cherokee was very blunt & harsh. Andrew Jackson said the Native Americans were not able to stay in Georgia because there living would become worse & eventually disappear.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Moving the Indian Tribes west of Mississippi was already a thought in the times of Monroe, who believed that it was important to the union. (Document N) However, due to all the advancements in Cherokee life, it would be hard to manipulate the Cherokee into moving west to give the U.S more land. The case of Worchester v. Georgia ended up in the Cherokee’s favor, stating that Georgia law had no place in the treaties and the Cherokee Nation, (Document P) but Andrew Jackson would not enforce it, not only because he felt he didn’t have to, but no one in Georgia would rise to protect the Cherokee from destruction.

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

Unfortunately for the native Indians, Andrew Jackson was not on their side when they demanded to be treated as sovereign entities. Although he did not have anything against Indians, he strongly believed that the federal government had no right or responsibility to defend

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Andrew Jackson, Is he a hero or a villain Since his presidency he has done many terrible things. Like the time his actions were what caused the wipeout of almost all the indians. His ratio of good and bad topples off on the bad side. Andrew Jackson is a villain. Due to Jackson 's actions there have been many consequences to people around him.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

In 1829, when President Andrew Jackson took office, one of his main goals were to move the Native Americans to the west of the Mississippi River. Jackson's purpose for their movement was to give the white settlers the land that the Native's had resided on and Jackson also had a strong belief that a good Indian was a dead Indian. When the Native Americans were ordered to move, the Cherokees went to the Supreme Court to challenge the removal order. In the case of Worester vs. Georgia, the verdict stated that the Cherokees had the right to keep their land, but Jackson refused to recognize the Court's decision. Jackson's Native American policy resulted in the removal of the Cherokee from their homeland to settlements across the Mississippi River,

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Many people, including some historians, portray Andrew Jackson as an “Indian Hater.” Jackson frequently fought against Native Americans, but why did he fight these people? In Pruchas article she talked about many different ways Jackson fought against Native Americans and what his reasoning was. In 1808, Jackson had believed there were a group of settlers that were killed by the creeks. He believed that Great Britain ordered the creeks to come over and kill the settlers.

Read More
265 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Jackson disobeyed a direct order from the Supreme Court, which it means he was above the law. I really wonder how Americans tolerated him, at that time, he was cruel to the Indian common man. Because of him, the Native Americans have the worst end of the Trail of Tears. They are the ones who are forced out of their traditional homes and sent away on a journey of pain and death. Those who had fallen ill, most of the time died, and those who had the will to move on were able to make it to the end and start new lives.

Read More
402 Words | 2 Pages

On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.

Read More

More about Comparison Of Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

Related Topics

Open Document