ipl-logo

Comparison Of Criminal And Civil Court Systems

600 Words3 Pages

Criminal and Civil Court Systems Although both civil and criminal courts are intended to control human behavior they each have a different purpose. Criminal court deals with crimes and the punishment of criminal offenders which could include imprisonment, fines, community service and the death penalty whereas civil court deals with disputes between two parties which could be either organizations or individuals, with compensation (usually financial) being awarded to the victim (Abadinsky, 2014). Civil court cases are filed by a private party and the judge decides if the defendant is liable or not, whereas criminal court cases are filed by the government and the jury decides if a guilty defendant is convicted or acquitted if not guilty (Abadinsky, 2014). In criminal court a defendant has certain constitutional protection that he or she would not have in civil court, such as he or she cannot be forced to testify in his or her own criminal trial whereas he or she would be forced to testify in his or her own civil trial (Abadinsky, 2014). Some other constitutional protections in criminal court is that if the defendant cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed to him or her free of charge …show more content…

Another similarity is that both criminal and civil courts have a jury, however the opinion of the jury differs in some states such as my state in New York where a guilty or not guilty vote must be unanimous whereas in a civil case it does not; an agreement by five of the six jurors is enough ("New york

Show More
Related

Comparing The Justice Systems Of Canadian With The United States Legal System

1101 Words | 5 Pages

Comparing the justice system of Canadian with the United States legal systems we find some similarities as well differences in the form of the legal system. However, viewing the Canadian criminal justice system it is somewhat separate in its combined judicial legal system where all the courts share the same system to include Canada’s Supreme Court which has the final decision authority throughout Canada. On the other hand, the United States has two parallel and independent judicial systems. The federal judicial system applies to federal law where the state judicial system is independent at the state level.

Read More

Compare And Contrast State Of Florida Vs Anthony

1063 Words | 5 Pages

Out of the over 350,000 cases brought to trial in the United States District Courts in 2016, almost 275,000 of them were civil and nearly 80,000 were criminal. No matter the type of case brought to court, both present evidence in front of a judge, resulting in a sentence after careful deliberation. Although there are multiple similarities between civil law and criminal law, there are many differences that differentiate the two as well. A criminal case deals with any sort of punishable offense against society.

Read More

Dual Court System Case Study

336 Words | 2 Pages

The United States utilizes dual court system in their courts. This means that there is a separate jurisdiction for each state, but each of those jurisdictions fall under the federal court jurisdiction (Bohm & Haley, 2011). The state court process begins in a trial court of limited jurisdiction. It would then move to a trial court of general jurisdiction and if appealed, into an Intermediate court of appeals. In the federal courts, a case would begin in the district court, then move into the circuit court of appeals if necessary.

Read More

What Is Del Mason Trial

401 Words | 2 Pages

A civil case typically begins when one party files a complaint against the other. 3. A grand jury is a body of people legally empowered to conduct official proceedings that investigate possible criminal conduct and to determine whether criminal charges should be brought. The grand jury in Del 's trial acquitted him after he was arrested, which led to his freedom. 4.

Read More

What Are The Similarities Between The United States And Spain Court System

2011 Words | 9 Pages

In law that is not codified, this means that instead of writing down numerous details of specific parts of the law, the Common law system instead relies mainly on precedent in which the judiciary will render it’s judgment regarding a particular area of law based off of past decisions in cases with similar content (Cal-Berkeley). Another difference is the role the judge plays in a court case. In the Civil law system, the judge’s decision making has to be within the confines of the law meaning that regardless of who the judge is they have to render a ruling based off of what the law says which doesn’t allow for the judge’s personal interpretation of the law (Cal-Berkeley). Also, judges in the Civil law system are essentially in addition to being the judge, is also the investigator, jury, and prosecutor in a sense because they are the ones who files the charges against the party and in addition to presiding over the case they

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brazil Legal System

1008 Words | 5 Pages

Although common-law systems make extensive use of statutes, judicial cases are regarded as the most important source of law, which gives judges an active role in developing rules. In civil-law systems, codes and statutes are designed to cover all eventualities and judges have a more limited role of applying the law to the case in hand. Past judgments are no more than loose guides. When it comes to court cases, judges in civil-law systems tend towards being investigators, while their peers in common-law systems act as arbiters between parties that present their

Read More

Criminal Cases: The O. J. Simpson Case

169 Words | 1 Pages

The reason O.J. was found not guilty of murder and acquitted in criminal court, but found guilty of the tort of harm and ordered to pay damages in the civil court lies in the structure of our legal system, in regards to criminal cases and civil cases. The distinct difference between criminal cases and civil cases provides further explanation regarding the O.J. Simpson case. Criminal cases deal with crimes against society. It is the government, not the victim, who brings action against the charged individual. In criminal cases, the penalties can include a number things including jail time.

Read More

Gideon V Wainwright Essay

432 Words | 2 Pages

Six years later, in Johnson v. Zerbst, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a poor federal criminal defendant who faces serious criminal charges is entitled to an attorney at the expense of the government. According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the right to counsel is thought necessary to protect fundamental human rights of life and liberty and that an average person accused of a crime does not have the professional legal skill to protect himself/herself. Unfortunately, this right only applied to indigent defendants facing serious charges in federal court but did not apply to the states.

Read More

Dbq South Asia

374 Words | 2 Pages

With the passing away of Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb in 1707 and the culmination of the might of the Mughal Empire, the Muslims of South Asia faced serious threats to their existence. There was infighting between Mughal princes for the throne, Aurangzeb had spent much of the treasury fighting the Marathas in the South, to no avail; and the Sikhs had risen in Punjab to pose a serious threat to Mughal rule. The division of the court itself created serious problems for the Muslims. Hardly had any ruler settled onto the throne that wars for succession broke out between brothers.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Over The Court System

473 Words | 2 Pages

Over the past week I have read both chapter one and two. Chapter one when over the justice system. Basically explaining the court system structure and how it was established. It has many examples of federal court verses state court systems. Our first discussion board was on the advantages and disadvantages of the two court systems.

Read More

Comparing The Civil Law System And Flexible Sentencing

1092 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history, two primary legal systems have coexisted globally: the civil law system and the common law system (Diffen). The civil law system is characterized by adherence to statutory laws and legal codes that prescribe specific penalties for various offenses, thereby limiting judges' discretion in sentencing. In contrast, the common law system empowers judges to consider prior case judgments and legal precedents when determining sentences. This approach allows for a more flexible sentencing process that takes into account the unique circumstances of each case and the broader societal context, with a focus on ensuring fairness and justice in individual instances. As has been defined by many criminal laws from different jurisdictions,

Read More

Bill Of Rights And Protections Of The Fourteenth Amendment

1301 Words | 6 Pages

It’s possible for an individual to be tried in criminal court for a crime and then be sued in civil court for damages caused by the same criminal act, such as O.J Simpson case. For the purpose of the Fifth Amendment, they are considered different in nature. No Excessive, Cruel or Unusual

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Specialized Courts

420 Words | 2 Pages

Specialized Courts Specialized courts are commonly known as the problem-solving courts that promote positive reinforcement, support behavior modification, decrease victimization, and reduce recidivism. Examples of specialized courts include drug court and mental health courts. A community might benefit from establishing a specialized court such as a drug court because it follows a comprehensive model that concentrates on reducing criminal actions through treatment and rehabilitation services with the focus being on substance abuse addiction and identifying the cause without jeopardizing public safety and due process (Specialized Courts, 2013).

Read More

Strengths And Weaknesses Of The Civil Justice System

715 Words | 3 Pages

It was revealed by a survey carried out by National Consumer Council how unhappy and unsatisfactory people were with the Civil Justice System. The main weaknesses identified were that the system being too slow, too complicated for ordinary people to understand and too outdated and costly. In the continued criticism of the system Lord Woolf was appointed by the government who came up with suggestions and solutions to overcome these problems. As a result Civil Procedure Rules came into force on 26th April 1999 introducing different reforms to the system. The rationale of the reforms was to avoid litigation and promote settlement between the parties at dispute.

Read More

Civil Law Advantages And Disadvantages

3020 Words | 13 Pages

Introduction Civil Justice System The civil justice system exists in order to enable individuals, businesses, and local and central government to vindicate, and where necessary, enforce their civil legal rights and obligations, whether those rights are private or public. It ensures that the rights and protection of citizens are called for. The rule of law dictates that government should not abuse their powers as per AV Dicey’s concept of the rule of law. In addition, the civil courts endorse economic activity, allowing contracts to be made between strangers because rights are taken care of in the courts if they are breached.

Read More

More about Comparison Of Criminal And Civil Court Systems

Related Topics

Open Document