ipl-logo

Concise Essay That Refute Moral Relativism

1129 Words5 Pages

Write a concise essay that refutes moral relativism and defends objective morals. Give clear examples.
Life and death decisions are taken every day in courtrooms around the world over our concepts of right and wrong. Most people perceive something is right or wrong as a “gut feeling” but when asked to explain the origin of morality they often appeal to personal experience, society, or simply fail to provide a logical basis for their moral system. Morality then is understood as a human construct, relative to persons, and subject to change. This is commonly called moral relativism.
But if morality is to be grounded in society or individuals, then it becomes impossible to condemn, for example, the passing of the Nuremberg Laws that stripped Jews of citizenship and gave them the status of “subjects”; the submission of Jews—children, …show more content…

Let us analyze a few options that have been offered to explain the origin of morality:
1. - Morality is defined as that which assists the flourishing of society. If this is the case, then the advancement of human evolution trough the survival of the fittest would be the ultimate benefit to society. This ideology—supported by social Darwinism—is at home with the proceedings of the second and third Reich and can be used to justify genocide through the systematic elimination of the weakest and less privileged members of society; a sort of man-made “power boost” to natural selection.
2. – Morality is defined by the individual. But here, again, morality is simply reduced to a matter of opinion and any disagreement is to be settled by a majority. This method is also inadequate to determine if the atrocities of Nazi Germany where immoral for Hitler’s opinion would be as valid as any other. After all, he had the support of the majority of German citizens and German

Show More
Related
1893 Words | 8 Pages

“Morality is not properly the doctrine of how we may make ourselves happy, but how we may make ourselves worthy of happiness” (Immanuel Kant). Morality is the divergence between right and wrong in every aspect of life. The history of the world has demonstrated human need to attain sovereignty. In the journey to achieve this goal, people have forgotten the gravity of the steps taken to complete an ideal and have only focused on the result. There have been several examples where detrimental actions have been taken by fortunate people to accomplish their goals.

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

Conclusion Moral objectivism is the idea that moral standards are capable of being applied universally around the world. There are many challenges to this theory stripping it of its validity. However, Shafer-Landau and other philosophers provide evidence to some exceptions still allowing moral objectivity to stand and be valid.

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in the textbook, Think Critical Thinking and Logical Skills For Everyday Life by Judith A Boss, there are two primary forms of moral theories. The first of these two theories are “those that claim that morality is relative” and the second is “those that claim that morality is universal” (Boss, 279). Moral relativists states that there is no universal law or view on what is considered to be morally right and what is morally wrong (Boss 279). In contrast, a universal morality states that there are specific moral values or views that all should follow (Boss, 279). Both of these views are filled with flaws.

Read More
516 Words | 3 Pages

While morality and sympathy can be in a constant battle, ultimately the one that wins is what the person is more obligated to. Bennett presents Heinrich Himmler, Jonathan Edwards and Wilfred Owen in the article to show how sympathy does not always win over morality. Heinrich Himmler is the Nazi who came up with the “Final Solution” to murder mass amounts of people.

Read More
1507 Words | 7 Pages

Questions of morality are abstract and extremely touchy. They are subject to enduring debates regarding its origins, nature, and limits, with no possibility of a consensus. Although the theories on morality often pursue diverse angles, among the most interesting ones that have come up in recent times revolve around the question whether human beings are born with an innate moral sense. Some scholars hold the view that humans are born with an inherent sense of morality while others believe the opposite that humans are not born with an innate moral sense holds true. By using Steven Pinker’s

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

The concept of morality is commonly believed to be a byproduct of religion with “[n]early half of Americans believ[ing] that morality is impossible without belief in god” (Pyysiäinen 44). Yet, the correlation between the two seems to be less concrete with research showing that “[c]ountries with high rates of religiosity tend to have higher rates of homicide, juvenile mortality (including suicide), sexually transmitted diseases and adolescent pregnancy, and abortion ( 45). Moreover, a study evaluated by Pyysiäinen finds that “religiosity has little to nothing to do with how people evaluate the goodness or badness and acceptability vs. non-acceptability of particular moral judgements” (Pyysiäinen 47). Instead of religion creating morals, Broom

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

Morality is a topic that will always contain a variety of viewpoints, conversations, and problems, but it is a subject that will never have a factual or concrete answer. Although it has history and many similar general understandings, morality is, simply put, an idea, to which people have different perceptions within their lives due to information gained from their experiences and the thoughts of others. Friedrich Nietzsche describes his view of the issue in On the Genealogy of Morals, creating a main talking point through detailing the difference between “master” morality and “slave” morality. He describes this separation by showing that originally, people of power dictated what was good and bad, as they valued qualities such as physical strength

Read More
1016 Words | 5 Pages

Ruth Benedict, an anthropologist, argues that morality is relative and based on one's culture or society. What could be morally acceptable in one culture is not necessarily acceptable in another culture. She believes that “the most spectacular illustrations of the extent to which normality may be culturally defined are those cultures where an abnormality of our culture is the cornerstone” (134). James Rachels, a philosopher, argues that Benedict’s argument is fallible. The conclusion of her argument does not follow from the premises.

Read More
829 Words | 4 Pages

Therefore, Moral Relativism explains that “...conflicting moral beliefs can both be true.” Moral Relativism justifies all moral codes by clarifying that culture and consistent modeling of visual examples create an exemplary set of actions. These conducts are specifically seen as moral and understood by those who participate in that civilization. Prinz relate allegations that crop up when discussing Moral Relativism. One of the accusations question the act of criticizing Hitler, “Relativism entails that we have no way to criticize Hitler.”

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

Darwin's philosophy goes as far as to explain the origin of morality. Today, natural selection and the theory of evolution is widely accepted. It is understood that all species, included our own, has benefited from the fine tuning of our traits by means of natural selection. Since humans are descended from animals, who seem to have little to no moral scale, morals were not created before natural selection. Rather, what eventually separated us from our animal ancestors was our development of intellect and morality.

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

Eylul Icgoren 21601232 005 Essay no 2 29.11.16 Morality is to understand whether a behavior or an event is good or evil. Morals prevent chaos in societies and make them survive. Bloom, Shermer and Prinze analyze how morals shape and what are they based on. They tell that it is possible in two ways, which are emotions and reasoning.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

Morality. It has been questioned, emphasized, and respected since the beginning of time. Yet even today, not one human being can say what is morally right. Rather, morality is a matter of opinion. It was the opinion of Victor Frankenstein which stated that it was alright to create a “monster”.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

In the discussion of moral objectivism and moral relativism, it is important to understand the difference, and the impact that a moral system has on the criminal justice community. The community exists to enforce the laws. Moral judgments are made with votes, and the decisions on how laws are crafted are made by elected officials. For this reason, it makes sense for the criminal justice community to separate themselves professionally from their own moral views. Moral Relativism is the view of morality, much like beauty, is relative to the person, culture, or organization.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
1163 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout history many great philosophers have attempted to unravel the origins of virtues by developing moral theories of their own. This document is designed to provide the reader with an overview of some of the more popular theories concerning morals. Three of the most popular moral theories are… Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism. Though Utilitarianism, Kantianism, and Aristotelianism differ in many ways, they also share similar fundamentals. Utilitarianism is a highly acclaimed theory that is morally based on consequentialism.

Read More

More about Concise Essay That Refute Moral Relativism

Related Topics

Open Document