ipl-logo

The Death Of Morality Jesse Prinz Analysis

829 Words4 Pages

In the article, “The Death Of Morality,” written by a philosopher named Jesse Prinz, it’s argued that morality is a ‘conditioned response’, a behavior that’s reinforced, by an individual’s culture and society. Prinz brought in proofs of varying behaviors accepted by certain societies such as, the practice of cannibalism- satisfying one’s hunger drives by way of human flesh and meat- has been proved through evidence to have been accommodated “...in 34% cultures in one cross-historical sample.” To many modern cultures and societies, cannibalism is completely and utterly inexcusable and unethical. But who is to say that either opposing view has the Universal Truth on their side? According to Prinz the Universal Truth doesn’t exist. Each culture practices conducts that will seem ‘wrong’ and against the Greater Consensus. …show more content…

Therefore, Moral Relativism explains that “...conflicting moral beliefs can both be true.” Moral Relativism justifies all moral codes by clarifying that culture and consistent modeling of visual examples create an exemplary set of actions. These conducts are specifically seen as moral and understood by those who participate in that civilization. Prinz relate allegations that crop up when discussing Moral Relativism. One of the accusations question the act of criticizing Hitler, “Relativism entails that we have no way to criticize Hitler.” As this does seem plausible concerning the fact that relativism does entail that every moral code is correct, Prinz debunks this claim by responding, “..the problem with Hitler was not that his values were false but that they were pernicious. Relativism does not ental that we should tolerate murderous tyranny.” Prinz seemed to have completely laid to rest declarations contrary to the view of Moral Relativism, but other philosophers had arguments opposing Prinz’s

Show More
Related
308 Words | 2 Pages

To better explain, moral relativism states that moral judgments are true or false, but “only relative to some particular standpoint

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

exceedingly common with the nobility of the middle ages Eleanor mentions that having a husband who was faithful could be boring which she quotes her former marriage with King Louis VII. Eleanor and Henry were both passionate and stubborn. They were both active in political affairs. even after Their marriage began to deteriorate. Eleanor still maintained power and authority at the lowest points of her life.

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Moral Relativism, should it be abandoned or not? This was the original question that came to my mind when starting off reading this excerpt. Mary Midgley, the author of this story, mentioned that now days we as people deny that we will ever be able to understand a culture that is not our own. That got me thinking and as I was thinking I found what she said to be relatively true. I feel as if society has shaped us as young adults to judge our culture as being the best and all other cultures as coming up second best.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will be evaluating whether or not the following two statements are incompatible. Claim one states that “What’s morally right for someone to do is whatever people in his or her culture do.” Claim two states that “It is never morally right to interfere with what people in other cultures do. ” I will define vulgar relativism and its three propositions according to William’s “Interlude: Relativism.”

Read More
1417 Words | 6 Pages

Morality is often viewed as a fixed set of principles that influence our behavior and decision-making, however, certain aspects of morality are universal and dynamic depending on the cultural, societal and behavioral context. While some principles are fixed, others have shifted with the changing society, making it a complex and multifaceted concept over time. In “The Moral Instinct,” Steven Pinker argues that morality is subjective and needs to change from time to time because it is highly influenced by context, culture, religion, and human emotions, ultimately making it universal but, at the same time, very particular; This concept can be seen in David Sedaris’s “Picka Pocketoni,” where he narrates an anecdote of encountering an American tourists

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

Our moral beliefs indicate the kind of environment or culture we grew up in. Therefore, if we were born in Somalia, we would believe that it is morally right to go through female circumcision as a rite of passage. However, if we grew up in the western world, then we would not believe in female circumcision. We can therefore see the relativist 's argument of cultural relativism in this case, because if cultural relativism exists, then naturally, morality will also be relative. Additionally, to support his stance, the relativist will also argue that tolerance comes into play when it comes to cultural relativism.

Read More
709 Words | 3 Pages

This is because of moral relativism’s take on ethical dilemmas, and the view that there are a number of disagreements among people as to the nature of morality. An act can

Read More
1091 Words | 5 Pages

To cultural relativists certain actions are wrong because society does not view them as being morally acceptable, or are correct because they fall into society’s ideal. The subjectivist believes that moral acceptability relies entirely on whether the individual approves of an action and carries it out. Both of these views of relativism are inconsistent with ethical objectivism because they believe

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

Philosophy 2200C Taylor Pearl Paper #1 The Cultural Differences Argument for Moral Relativism In this paper I will be discussing the theory of the Cultural Differences Argument for Moral Relativism and also the flaws this theory holds. First I will explain the general idea of Moral Relativism, followed by two examples of cultural differences that are often cited to further explain this theory. After that I will discuss what the Cultural Differences Argument is for Moral Relativism.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

In this prompt the argument that Morality exists is irrelevant, contrary to our thoughts and beliefs. Everyone follows a set of moral rules. Ethical relativists disagree with this belief because, they believe that morals are distinctive from each individual culture. These relativists as described are mixing up moral and cultural distinctions, or are simply not willing to completely understanding the cultures they are standing up for. There are two different types of relativism Ethical, and Cultural, that rely upon the argument of cultural differences, which have flaws that make the argument unsound.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Every society has its own unique cultures in which people will have different ideas of moral codes. The diversity of these cultures cannot be said to be correct or incorrect. Every society has independent standards of ethic within their society and these standards are culture-bound. Cultural Relativism has a perception in which rightness or wrongness of an action depends entirely within the bounds of the culture. This theory opposes the belief in the objectivity of moral truth.

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

The critiques will involve pointing out the errors together with the mistakes that one feels is a core principle in the cultural activity. If cultures were not making mistakes, then there would be nothing much to criticize. The major drawback with the no cultural criticism is that most of the dominant cultures around the world usually get criticized. Also, any given religion must be criticized when it commits an offense.

Read More
2321 Words | 10 Pages

In other words, “right” or “wrong” are culture specific, what is considered moral in one society may be considered immoral in another, and, since no universal standard of morality that exist, no one has the right to judge another societies custom (Ess, 2009). Cultural Relativism is closely related to ethical relativism, which views truth as variable and not absolute. What makes up right and wrong is determined solely by individual or the society (Ess, 2009). Since the truth is not object, there can be no standards which applies to all cultures.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

Cultural relativism has a variety of definitions, but the main idea is that a universal code of ethics does not exist--it varies culture to culture. Rachel’s examines cultural relativism in “The Challenge of Cultural Relativism” and argues that there are commonalities of ethics throughout every culture. Rachels sections off his argument to better explain what they believe. In this piece, they argue that cultural relativism is not a proper theory. They argue that it has many major flaws, but they acknowledge that parts of theory have some truth to it.

Read More
2607 Words | 11 Pages

(Luco, Week 3 Notes, p.9) Cultural Relativism is simply a combination of the following three theses: 1. The only criterion of moral truth or falsehood is the moral code of a cultural group. 2. A moral claim is true, relative to a culture’s moral code, if and only if the claim is generally accepted within that cultural

Read More

More about The Death Of Morality Jesse Prinz Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document