Condemn Locke Natural Rights

745 Words3 Pages

The notion of human rights, natural rights, and moral rights all emphasize universal law, laws not invented by any government. Natural law and natural rights deals with rights made by government, or given by God. Gortius articulated the modern notion of becoming a moral person. “ In this sense a right becomes moral quality of a person, making it possible to have or do something lawfully”(Gortius, 135). Hobbes believed that right of nature, implies a person should protect them self by any means necessary.
Locke believes the their are four principles of natural rights; life, health, liberty, and possessions. Locke reasoning on killing a thief, even if your life is not being threatened is “ I have no reason to suppose, that he, who would …show more content…

This is morally unacceptable, because I cannot give my life to you, It is not mine to give away. Our lives are on loan from God, so we have no right to give them to anybody. Locke believes that drudgery is acceptable because, it is a form of punishment for a person who committed a crime, and even though they are enslaved they still have their life. According to Fieser we can condemn Locke theory of drudgery, by arguing the lose of liberty. By taking away the right to go an d come as they please, or decide their own …show more content…

Burke does not completely reject the notion of natural rights instead he believes, “rights occupy a middle ground between purely abstract speculation and purely practical issues.” Which mean rights cannot always be defined exactly, however they are recognized when applied to actual problems. Freedom to, has to deal with liberties for example the freedom to smoke, freedom to speak freely. Whereas freedom from, deals with harm for example, freedom from being attacked, freedom from public insult. Bentham’s states the “facts” which legal right are grounded in the psychological dispositions of government officials, and their concern interest in upholding these laws.
According to Feiser we may also ground human rights in the fact of human thinking as a culturally shaped intuition, or an attitude shared by a smaller group of impartial people.
Marx’s refers to an “egostic man” as being one who isolation themselves from their own society, a person who is selfish and only cares about their own well-being. However a “species-being” is one who is connected to his society, and treats others like an extension of his own