ipl-logo

Conflict Between Ranchers And Federal Lands Out West Analysis

1217 Words5 Pages

“Conflict Between Ranchers and Federal Lands Out West” Landon Hillukka Mrs. Takkunen April 29, 2024 The conflict between ranchers and federal lands out west has been a contentious issue for decades, with both sides presenting valid arguments. The heart of the matter is the use of public lands for grazing livestock and the management of those lands by the federal government (“Ranchers and the Federal Government: The Long History of Conflict.” ). While ranchers argue that they have a historic right to use the land for grazing, critics argue that this is not a right, but a privilege that has been granted to them by the government (“Public Land Accounts for 29% of the Land Base in the Lower 48, with Much of That Land Concentrated in the West, While 71% of US …show more content…

They argue that they have a deep connection to the land and that grazing is necessary for their livelihood (“Federal Lands of the United States Map”). However, critics believe that the government should be the primary manager of public lands, as they are responsible for ensuring that the land is managed for the public good. The federal government has two agencies responsible for managing public lands in the western United States: the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the United States Forest Service (USFS). These agencies oversee millions of acres of public land, including land used for grazing. The agencies attempt to balance the needs of the ranchers with those of other stakeholders, such as environmental groups and recreational users. One of the primary issues in this conflict is the fees charged for grazing. Ranchers pay a fee to the federal government for the right to graze their livestock on public lands. The fees are intended to cover the cost of managing the land (“Ranchers and the Federal Government: The Long History of Conflict.” ). However, some ranchers believe that the fees are too

Show More
Related
683 Words | 3 Pages

Congressman Bishop began the seminar by discussing public lands and his continued work on the projects that he believes benefit Utah. He described the issue by first displaying a map of the amount of land that is considered public lands in the west in comparison to the land in the east. By and large, the east has little public lands and the west has a considerable amount. Congressman Bishop explained that this is because when the Eastern states joined the union they were given their land back to them. When the federal government did not give the land back a couple of eastern states sued the federal government and received their land.

Read More
1494 Words | 6 Pages

Mary and Carrie Dann, who’s ranch is in Crescent Valley in the heart of Western Shoshone territory, were approached in 1973 by the Bureau of Land Management and were told to apply for grazing permits and were told to pay grazing fees for their livestock. The coming year the Dann sisters were sued for trespassing, but the year before argued that their cattle were grazing on Western Shoshone Territory. The Dann sisters have since been struggling to maintain their way of life after the Bureau of Land Management has repeatedly tried to impound their livestock. Ever since, the Dann sisters have been struggling to maintain their way of life against the repeated attempts by the Bureau of Land Management to impound their livestock.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

There have been farms on the land for almost 100 years, and they pronounced the land as a national wilderness in 1962. The land has not been the proper definition of what a wilderness is considered to be in

Read More
1349 Words | 6 Pages

Alissa Gottwald Book Review, 29 Apr. 2024 Violence and Property in the American West In his book Federal Ground: Governing Property and Violence in the First U.S. Territories, Gregory Ablavsky deftly argues that the first federal territories were a place that the federal government was unable to effectively govern, yet its power, especially over property, grew expansively during that same period by nature of its relationship with the federal territories. In the course of his argument, Ablavsky produces a compelling narrative of the relationship amongst territory, property, people, and authority in the early years of the United States and the greater implications of the growth of federal power and the nature of federal territories, and lays

Read More
693 Words | 3 Pages

During the late 1800’s the US government attempted to bring peace back to the west by reducing territorial conflict between Indian tribes and western settlers. Indian tribes were to be given land and promised goods to keep conflict at a minimum; however, pressure from the settlers and failure to provide the promised goods sparked conflicts. Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins and the people of her tribe were some of those affected by the reservation policy’s failures. Sarah Winnemucca Hopkins did have a claim to demand her tibe’s land back because of her background, reservation laws in place, and reperations for how badly her tribe was treated. Sarah had a claim to demand the tribe’s land back simply due to her background.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

Any right thinking father earnestly desires and strives to leave his son both an untarnished name and a reasonable equipment for the struggle of life. So this Nation as a whole should earnestly desire and strive to leave to the next generation the national honor unstained and the national resources unexhausted. Such a policy will preserve soil, forests, water power as a heritage for the children and the children’s children of the men and women of this generation. The opinion of the Maine Supreme Bench sets forth unequivocally the principle that the property rights of the individual are subordinate to the rights of the community, and especially that the waste of wild timber land derived originally from the State. The Court says that there are two reasons why the right of the public to control and limit the use of private property is peculiarly applicable to property in land: First, such property is not the result of productive labor.

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

Many Americans were influenced by the Homestead Act which gave them 160 Acres of land as long as they maintained the land for 5 years. Eventually, the Native Americans no longer had somewhere to go. They decided to sign a treaty with the Americans which granted them a small reservation in which no American would cross and a promise that supplies would be sent. However, the supplies never came and Americans continued to cross into the reservation. The Native Americans wanted to fight back but they were powerless against the American’s

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

There’s an article by Dina Gilio-Whitaker, a native American woman, Called “Decolonizing the Black Bear Ranch Hippie Commune”, written earlier this year. This article articulates her, and many other natives’ views towards the 70’s hippie movement. They personally believe that the hippies were thefts then in a way we currently call cultural appropriation. “Hippies flocked to Indian reservations searching for Indian wisdom” but they then took that knowledge and bought cheap lands, stolen from “the very people they were trying to emulate”. Black Bear ranch is a piece of this stolen property and many are asking them the question that if its stolen land, can it really be “ free land for free

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

Special Field Order #15 promised that each newly freed family “shall have a plot of land no more than forty (40) acres of tillable ground, and when it borders on some water channel, with not more than 800 feet of waterfront”(Document #2). This order, that gave land to African Americans, was put in place to help them begin their new lives a freedmen. In spite of this, An Analysis of The Politics Of Land Confiscation and Restriction stated that “Northern business did not want Republicans setting a radical example for redistributing property from the wealthy to the poor… Fearing that the break up of beg southern states would disrupt cotton production, hurt their profits and undercut the national economy, these northern industrialists financiers, and trader were unyielding in their opposition to any kind of Reconstruction land reform” (Document #4). Simply put, rich whites with political power did not want African Americans to have land. This was because if African Americans had land, they would grow food to provide for their families and no one would be left to grow the cotton necessary for business success.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

The government is backing out of its agreement. You left us on land that is too small a size and most of it cannot be farmed. The government should give more land back, not kick us off the leftovers” (Erdrich 197). The Indian tribe members are irritated with the Termination bill and attempt to communicate their thoughts with the Government. Additional members speak up with their concerns about the bill and they take a vote.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

They disapprove of this policy they believe that “required them to reduce their heard of livestock-an indication that their sovereignty was far from absolute” (Foner 199). Meaning some of the Native Americans are feeling that the Government are only giving half of the rights they

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

Voting Crisis 3 ~ Passage of the Dawes Act and the End of the Indian Wars As Western Homesteaders, who happen to be farmers, we strongly stood behind the passage of the Dawes Act and an end to the indian wars. Our reasoning for supporting the Dawes Act was that if the land held by the native Americans was no longer affiliated by tribe, it could be privatized, which would offer us the opportunity of acquiring more land. Furthermore, a reduction of conflict between ourselves and the indians would greatly increase our quality of life, as the constant threat of raids had become a great nuisance.

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

In the early 1800s 500,000 acres were given to eight states and eventually land was given to 19 states. The federal

Read More
812 Words | 4 Pages

These issues can still improve through cooperation and understanding, however, and reaching a satisfactory decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline provides a perfect gateway to uplifting improvement of the reservations’ lifestyle. If the government agrees to give a little, a great opportunity arises for them to get a little as well. In the last decades, lack of funding has led to blatantly subpar education for the majority of Native American students, even when the government made an attempt to intervene due to an understandable inherent distrust of Government interference. Through a monumental compromise via the Dakota Access Pipeline, the government could prove its decency, transparency, and trustworthiness, which would advance the relationship of Native Americans and the United States Government brilliantly. The newfound trust could easily apply to areas such as financial welfare, educational support, and government-run health clinics.

Read More
1598 Words | 7 Pages

In the wake of the Peloponnesian War, the father of western philosophy was put to death by order of the city he called home. Socrates was found guilty for corrupting the minds of the youth and impiety and was sentences to death for his crimes by majority vote. In the many centuries after the death of Socrates, it has been debated whether or not he was or not guilty of the crimes he was accused of. Using the definition of justice according to Socrates in the works of Plato’s Republic, Crito, and the Apology, he was guilty. While he was guilty, the city putting him to death showed the danger of a direct democracy to act unjustly to harm a just citizen of their city.

Read More

More about Conflict Between Ranchers And Federal Lands Out West Analysis

Open Document