ipl-logo

Congress Should Have The Right To Regulate Essay

546 Words3 Pages

The U.S congress is by law, legally allowed to regulate commerce. Whether it be through states, or if it's through foreign nations, congress does have a right to regulate what it's citizens are doing on the internet. In Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3, listed in our constitution. Yet even though the founding fathers did not mean to intend that congress has accessibility to American's trading via electronics. It still can be implied that trading happens on the internet, and therefore congress is given a right to regulate it. Though it does not say that the states, nor do local government has the luxury of this right. So a federal agency such as the FBI, or the CIA will, and should have access to what us Americans have been doing via the internet. …show more content…

Such as our social media, files, pictures, or videos. Though this information should be used with a good cause on a federal level. The state, and local government should not be able to obtain this right to withhold over their citizens. For this can cause an increased amount of monitoring it's citizens giving them access to our public, and private life. Our private information should only be used for the security of our country. And it should stay like this since our private information is precious to us. And for it to be ripped out of our hands, and given to local, and state governments at large can be problematic. For example, using our precious information for something other than protecting our country, can cause certain restrictions, and regulations that are would be used on any type of socialization within the internet. Take Germany, Germany social media is targeting hate speech within social media platforms. And it is called the "Enforcement on Social Networks" the communication that is considered hate speech will be removed within 24 hours after enough complaints come in. As well as fines resulting up to €50

Show More
Related
523 Words | 3 Pages

You 're also subject to expensive fines and fees, mandatory

Read More
459 Words | 2 Pages

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, the ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right of privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions. And being searched. Good Thing

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

Censorship of The First Amendment This paper will discuss how censorship denies citizens of the United States our full rights as delineated in the First Amendment. It will outline how and why the first amendment was created and included in the Constitution of the United States of America. This paper will also define censorship, discuss a select few legal cases surrounding freedom of speech and censorship as well as provide national and local examples of censorship.

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

If the fourth amendment was follow the police would need a warrant to do that but in today's world we wouldn't need it anymore. Because since we share our things with other people for instance phone companies, credit card companies, or by making your local shopping card, the Supreme Court has the right to look at your personal documents as well. By doing so you let them know what you do, such as who you call, what you buy, and who you call, so you cannot call that information private. “Let's say the police or FBI wanted to gather intimate details about your life back in the old days — meaning, before computers came along. Whom are you meeting?

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

What, As Americans Are We Entitled To In America today, people have created a cultural belief that they are entitled to something without having to work for it, or put forth any effort, people have become lazy, unethical, and lack basic morals. Our society has become self-absorbed, and have an all about me attitude, it’s about what people are entitled to as opposed to what should be gained by their own merits. Americans have forgotten what the true meaning of entitlement is, they are only entitled to the things that are described in the Constitution, which are your inalienable rights, but then in fact those are not just given they have to be earned. There are things that people are expected to do, and things that they should do without any reward, not saying that receiving

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

I believe that they are violating our rights by tracking us digitally. If their reason is to track terrorist threats, it’s a bit ironic to do that since we are taking oil from the Middle East, which is a country full of terrorism. The National Security Agency can access everything we do online and monitor text messages that we send. They collect every single thing we do digitally to track any terrorist threats.

Read More
109 Words | 1 Pages

Personal records given to the NSA or government without a probable cause or reasoning for a search warrant repels everything the Fourth Amendment represents. As said by Samuel Warren and Louis Brandeis “Now the right to life has come to the right to be let alone” with the government and other associations receiving the right to track records at any moment takes away from the feeling of security the Fourth Amendment is supposed to give citizens. The confidentiality of individual’s personal belongings, feeling of security, and freedom from governmental obstruction is what makes the Fourth Amendment important to society, although search-warrants can be issued with causes that seem reasonable.

Read More
649 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine a student put a poster in the school explaining what should be changed about the dress code, but the administration quickly tore down the sign because they did not like what it said. The first amendment in the constitution says that “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble… ” It is appropriate for a public school to limit what a student can say when the expression is not peaceful, when the message is harmful to others, and if the demonstration is a disruption to learning. To begin, a public schools should be able to limit what a student can say if it is a violent demonstration. For example, the article, “Do Students Still Have Free Speech in School?”, by David R. Wheeler states “... schools can punish any speech as long as they can cite “intimidation.” Intimidation is not a form of peacefulness and should not be tolerated at any school.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

The personal liberties of Americans is what gives meaning to being an American. These liberties should be respected and upheld to the greatest efforts possible and should not be abridged by no means less than do process as exemplified by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the American Constitution. However, over time, we have learned about legislation that has been enacted by our government with said efforts to protect the nation. Hence, the Espionage and Sedition Acts, the confinement of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War, the Red Scare post-WWII, and the Pentagon Papers of 1971 are all examples that depict some of the behaviors performed by the federal government that would appear to infringe on these liberties.

Read More
832 Words | 4 Pages

US News reports the FISA and USA Patriot Act as a "privacy scandal" (Fox, 2013). NPR News reports the concern of "civil liberty[ies] groups" protesting the USA Patriot Act and the concern for the authorities to demand business records from various companies (Johnson, 2011, p.1). What the media fails to convey to the general public is the intent of these Acts is to combat terrorism and not to invade privacy. Millions of people travel the world every day snapping photos from their digital cameras and iPhones. Perhaps to capture a memory or an unusual event, and sometimes other people in the background.

Read More
632 Words | 3 Pages

There are many who believe the Fourth Amendment provides the people with the right to privacy, but that is not the case at all. The Fourth Amendment is the people's guarantee that searches for the purpose of finding evidence which can be used in a court of law can only be implemented with probable cause. Not only does law enforcement have to show probable cause but their search warrant must describe the place they are going to search as well as what or who may be seized (Bohm &

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

The National Security Agency monitors the internet directly based on communications with foreign affairs. The overall control of cyberspace is determined not only within our nation, but with allies as well. The US government cannot make laws about the use of cyberspace and the internet without the consultation of other countries. For concerns with cyberspace like monitoring internally and websites, they government has control over its people’s access. The government has the write to establish websites for our nation but they need to discuss changes in the greater extent with other

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout the recent years the majority of the able voting population are exercising their privilege to vote. Even during the presidential elections the voter turnout rate was 50% or less than that. The act of voting should be a personal responsibility of every citizen meaning it should be a obligation. But to specify on this statement, it should not lawfully required to vote because people also have the right not to vote too (and it would be weakening personal liberties) , but it should be a personal responsibility for citizens if they are to complain about how the government run rather than every citizen. A personal responsibility is when we are the cause of our own actions.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution stresses how important the security of our privacy is, but this right is constantly infringed.

Read More

More about Congress Should Have The Right To Regulate Essay

Related Topics

Open Document