ipl-logo

The Usa Patriot Act

832 Words4 Pages

The FISA and the USA Patriot Act The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act (USA Patriot Act) are two actions taken to aid in the efforts against terrorism in the United States. FISA was enacted in 1978 and the U.S. Patriot Act was enacted in 2001 (McAdams III, no date). Both Acts have been and will continue to be critical instruments to combat terrorism. However, the media has exploited these Acts in terms of civil liberties and has demoralized the truth behind them. This has led the public to misunderstand the purpose and process of both FISA and the USA Patriot Act. The FISA was enacted by Congressional legislation …show more content…

The Act provides the authority for the sharing of information between the intelligence community and law enforcement agencies in an effort to fight terrorism (McAdams III, no date). The Act allows law enforcement to use surveillance to combat terrorism, allows law enforcement to delay warrant notifications to prevent any negative impact to investigations, and under certain circumstances, gives federal agencies the authority to search business records as required to investigate terrorist activity (Department of Justice, no date). It also provides authority for law enforcement agencies to respond to terrorist activity and assist victims of computer trespassing (Department of Justice, no date). The USA Patriot Act updates and improves the FISA in an effort to fight the war on terrorism. However, the media has twisted the minds of the public into a different perspective of these …show more content…

US News reports the FISA and USA Patriot Act as a "privacy scandal" (Fox, 2013). NPR News reports the concern of "civil liberty[ies] groups" protesting the USA Patriot Act and the concern for the authorities to demand business records from various companies (Johnson, 2011, p.1). What the media fails to convey to the general public is the intent of these Acts is to combat terrorism and not to invade privacy. Millions of people travel the world every day snapping photos from their digital cameras and iPhones. Perhaps to capture a memory or an unusual event, and sometimes other people in the background. Are random photographs an invasion of privacy? The point is intelligence collectors are not interested in the daily communications of millions of citizens--they are interested in collecting information on terrorist and criminal activity. If this is the price we have to pay in order to make our country a safer place to live, then people shouldn 't complain. If the alternative is another attack like 9//11, maybe the anti-USA Patriot activists might think twice about their civil liberties. However, the Government is now considering changes to appease the

Show More
Related

Patriot Act Pros And Cons

953 Words | 4 Pages

This is a clear example that shows that even the most controversial parts of the Patriot Act are not just constitutional, but strongly supported by the Constitution. From this, many see that any attempted claims that the Patriot Act is wrong in the law are based merely on thought. But, there are more than one sections of the Patriot Act that are up for debate. Any arguments against the Patriot Act are destroyed quickly due to the fact that, “no single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional,” (McNeil). Once again, it is clear that the Patriot Act is constitutional.

Read More

Patriot Act Research Paper

1261 Words | 6 Pages

1. The Patriot Act (Title II, Sec. 213) allows for the delayed notification of the execution of a search warrant. Under what circumstances can the notification be delayed? The Patriot Act upholds a standard for the protection of privacy while performing search and seizure actions under the emphases that a physical warrant document is issued to the person that the search is performed on.

Read More

USA Patriot Act Case Study

419 Words | 2 Pages

The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2001, due to the need for cooperation among all levels of security. Police and other department agencies were given powerful authority and encouraged to share information. This is to meet the goal for a safer America in times of turmoil including international affairs. But as the years have passed and as terrorist attacks seem to cease, people have begun to question if there’s too many restrictions on law enforcement were called off.

Read More

Does The NSA Stick To The Statue Quo?

1277 Words | 6 Pages

The U.S follows a different school of surveillance. Despite the fundamental right to be held “innocent until proven guilty”, it monitors everyone until proven innocent. The status quo could of course damage America’s long known liberties granted by the Constitution. Recent revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden, have confirmed that the government is more likely to cross some constitutional lines in the name of national security. “The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) regulates the government’s acquisition of any electronic surveillance within the country for foreign intelligence use.

Read More

Patriot Act Pros And Cons

437 Words | 2 Pages

Subsequent, to the September 11th,2001 terrorist attacks, the Department of Justice proposed The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act) to prevent future terroristic attacks. According to Preserving Life and Liberty article, the PATRIOT ACT has played an imperative part in “a number of successful operations to protect innocent Americans from plans of terrorist dedicated to destroying America and our way of life.” Further, Rosemary Jenks emphases in her article “A Summary of the Anti-Terrorism Law’s Immigration – Related Provision” that the PATRIOT Act focuses mainly on “reinforcing the arsenal of tools available to the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and federal prosecutors for identifying and disabling terrorist networks operating both

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Patriot Act

679 Words | 3 Pages

The second source opposes the Patriot Act for it abruptly and illegally interferes with the privacy of individuals. Thus, millions of people in the United States are having their Sixth Amendment violated because of this act, rather than eing protected from illegal terrorists. In addition, the Patriot Act was also re-written, making it legal for surveillance on any person in the country without them being aware of it. It is obvious this new part of the act is illegal and unconstitutional because people are not allowed to be listened to without permission. The source also states that a judge said the act

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Patriot Act

413 Words | 2 Pages

In 2001 only a little over a month after 911 The Patriot Act was passed. On the surface the act seems to be concerned with the safety of the American people; however it was reactionary, a result of the culture of fear created by America’s first experience with terrorism, a word that still holds a powerful

Read More

Persuasive Essay 1984

451 Words | 2 Pages

Just 45 days after 9/11 the Patriot Act was hastily passed. The act is in clear violation of the Fourth Amendment that protects against unlawful search and seizure; it allows our government to spy on American citizen’s technology use without a warrant. The act was intended to protect against terrorism, but between 2003 and 2005 there were 143,074 National Security Letters that allowed the FBI to search through personal information without a warrant resulting in 53 criminal referrals, of which zero were terrorist threats (ACLU). I do believe in monitoring for terrorist threats , but we can’t let fear control our decisions. Our right to privacy is fundamental, and without reasonable cause no one should be monitored by the

Read More

Patriot Act 4th Amendment

651 Words | 3 Pages

On September 11th, 2001, tragedy struck America. A terrorist attack was carried out resulting in 2,753 Americans killed. America became locked in a war, and it needed more security on its own soil. So, congress passed a law known as the Patriot Act. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records, phone calls and other surveillance.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of NSA Surveillance

650 Words | 3 Pages

Following the national outrage of September 11, the Bush administration passed the Patriot Act in 2001. This allowed the government to surveillance suspected terrorists without a warrant. These government powers were extended in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 2006. These laws were passed through congress. Arguments by some that this warrantless surveillance violates the Fourth Amendment ignores the legal concept of ‘substantive due process.’

Read More

The Credibility Of The Patriot Act

168 Words | 1 Pages

“The Patriot Act broadly undermines the rights of all Americans. It reduces judicial oversight of a host of investigative measures, including wiretaps, expands the government 's ability to track individuals ' Internet use and gives federal officials expansive new powers that are in no way limited to investigating terrorist crimes. ( thenation) It authorizes an end run around the Fourth Amendment by allowing the government to conduct wiretaps and searches in criminal investigations, without probable cause of a crime, as long as the government claims that it also seeks to gather foreign intelligence--an authority that is particularly questionable in light of recent disclosures from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that the FBI has

Read More

9/11 Impact On American Society Essay

1522 Words | 7 Pages

The USA Patriot Act is critical to the ongoing efforts that the system of government has created

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Civil Liberties

1030 Words | 5 Pages

population about this policy are controversial and have been hot topics in the news ever since. Lastly, the fallout after 9/11 associating with the USA PATRIOT Act has brought Americans to become suspicious of their own government. They were completely unaware of the FBI’s database meant to spy on them and gather exceptionally personal information. The amount of focus people have placed upon their leaders has made the country more lawful and

Read More

Watergate Scandal Summary

1667 Words | 7 Pages

According to Maranzani (2017), FISA has not only been amended significantly in the last four decades since Watergate, there were similar acts where it expanded the perimeters of surveillance; i.e. 2001 USA Patriot Act, 2007 Protect America Act, etc. Many acts have been passed and signed by previous administrations to not only give federal agencies to combat terrorism, it was to utilize the tools on suspected individuals or groups without violating one’s constitution rights; i.e. wiretapping, surveillance, etc. (Maranzani, 2017). The Watergate Scandal had a long-term effect of how the federal government including the executive branch utilize surveillance techniques or tools without infringing one’s rights. Since the aftermath of the scandal, many journalists have jaded view towards the Republican party believing that all Republicans could be or the next Richard Nixon.

Read More

Is National Security Better Than Personal Privacy

262 Words | 2 Pages

Is National Security better than Personal Privacy? People fear their loss of privacy, but the government is trying to protect us. The 4th Amendment states that citizens have the right to protect their privacy and should not be violated without a warrant. The Patriot Act was passed to protect citizens from terrorism. However, privacy is always a good thing to have but when it comes to protecting our country national security is the best way to go.

Read More

More about The Usa Patriot Act

Related Topics

Open Document