Pros And Cons Of NSA Surveillance

650 Words3 Pages

Despite public outcry and threats of impeachment, the National Security Administration’s (NSA) surveillance programs including US984XN, also known as PRISM, benefit the citizens of the United States of America. First of all, these programs are there to protect us from the very real threat of terrorist activity (The verge, 2013). Second, despite uninformed claims to the contrary, these programs could well be legal. Finally, this surveillance does very little to impact the amount of privacy we have in this digital age. The NSA’s surveillance is not a threat to the rights of law abiding US citizens, and should be allowed to continue. The state of global and domestic affairs necessitates the existence of surveillance programs like those implemented …show more content…

Following the national outrage of September 11, the Bush administration passed the Patriot Act in 2001. This allowed the government to surveillance suspected terrorists without a warrant. These government powers were extended in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 2006. These laws were passed through congress. Arguments by some that this warrantless surveillance violates the Fourth Amendment ignores the legal concept of ‘substantive due process.’ Simply put, substantive due process is the method the courts use to determine which parts of the constitution to uphold (Francis, 2013). For example, in the past it was argued that federally mandated minimum wage laws violated the right to make contracts, a right protected under the constitution. However, through substantive due process, the courts ruled that minimum wage laws were for the public benefit, and therefore constitutional (Legal Information Institute). The fact that these surveillance programs are explicitly for national defense makes it likely that they will be upheld if brought before the United States Supreme Court, especially considering the ideological leanings of Supreme Court