ipl-logo

What Are The Arguments Against Section 702

253 Words2 Pages

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) allows the United States government to gather foreign intelligence information concerning persons located outside of the country that are, or are connected to, a potential threat against the nation. In addition to protecting national security, the communications data collected under Section 702 has been used for criminal prosecution in domestic court cases. Since it passed in 2008, scholars have raised questions over the act’s constitutionality, especially about its consistence with the Fourth Amendment which protects both US and non-US persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. These scholars argue that not all communications gathered under Section 702 meet the reasonableness requirement of the Fourth Amendment and should therefore not be used in criminal cases. However, Section 702 mainly conflicts with the Constitution only when the act is used inappropriately by agencies to investigate people residing within the US rather than for its intended purpose of gathering foreign intelligence. In order to ensure that the Fourth Amendment is not violated in the process of gathering foreign surveillance intelligence or using such intelligence in a domestic court case, FISA Section 702 must be amended. …show more content…

Three amendments that should be made to the act are that only communications to or from a target may be gathered by the NSA, US persons located outside of the United States may only be targeted if they have connections to foreign powers, and that before use in domestic courts, prosecutors must ensure that all data used in the investigation is gathered

Show More
Related
625 Words | 3 Pages

One of, if not, the most provocative arguments Kerr offers in his article is that the third-party doctrine should not be framed in terms of “reasonable expectation of privacy” in which a person “waives” their reasonable expectation of privacy, but rather as a consent doctrine. In his view, what we voluntarily disclose to third parties eliminates Fourth Amendment protection because of implied consent. Specifically, a person voluntarily discloses information to a third party if they do so knowingly. Consequently, searches, if a government agent’s conduct is deemed as such, are reasonable because the person allowed the government to do so. Kerr’s example for his principle is problematic.

Read More
1082 Words | 5 Pages

Procedural History In 2004, Antoine Jones was suspected of drug trafficking, which led to the FBI installing an unwarranted Global Positioning System (GPS) on Jones’ vehicle. On October 24, 2005, Jones was arrested for drug possession. The FBI obtained evidence needed to indict Jones on conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine and 50 grams or more of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U. S. C. §§841 and 846. Jones was represented by A. Eduardo Balarezo, who filed a motion before trial to suppress evidence obtained by the GPS.

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The Fourth Amendment should be stricter because law enforcement agencies

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

The third amendment protects us from housing soldiers during war or peace. Unless you allow them to go into your home. The fourth amendment protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The government must have probable cause cause or a good reason to search you.

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

1. The Fourth Amendment protects the fundamental of search and seizure. Which in this case, discusses the importance of obtaining physical evidence and how it is used. In other words, the Fourth Amendment can be violated if the evidence gathered has been obtained unreasonably.

Read More
392 Words | 2 Pages

In 2001, following the most successful terrorist attack on U.S. soil in the history of the nation, the Bush Administration and Congress granted the National Security Agency (NSA) broad powers to collect both foreign and domestic intelligence to avoid a similar strike in the future. Ever since, the NSA has conducted covert measures to collect signal intelligence on a global scale. The extension of powers granted to the NSA has been met with significant controversy on both its legality and constitutionality. It is apparent that the NSA surveillance program is constitutional for citizens of the United States, because all stored data is encrypted upon collection, and warrants are needed to decrypt the stored data for review. However, the United

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

“The Fourth Amendment says that you have an expectation of privacy in your home and person (body). The government cannot search you, your home, or belongings without a good reason.” (Background Essay). But, through the years the government has invaded the protection the Fourth Amendment has given to society. For example, “Federal agents put a bug- a device that allowed them to listen to the conversations” (Doc A).

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

The Patriot Act was designed to help law enforcements in the fight against terrorist, future terrorist attacks, and to help gather information. A positive result to the Act is that it gives an increase of surveillance systems and allows the federal government to capture and monitor many different ways to communicate. An example of this would be, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI) development and use of an intercepting program called the Carnivore. This Program allowed the FBI to capture, record, and sort digital communications like a computer email or a text message. The FBI discontinued the Carnivore program in 2002, the organization wanted a more gainful product instead.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2001, due to the need for cooperation among all levels of security. Police and other department agencies were given powerful authority and encouraged to share information. This is to meet the goal for a safer America in times of turmoil including international affairs. But as the years have passed and as terrorist attacks seem to cease, people have begun to question if there’s too many restrictions on law enforcement were called off.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Some people may think that the 14th amendment does a poor job of protecting people’s rights. In document five it explains how on September 11, 2001,with the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, it has caused video surveillance in the United States to increase. For example the U.S has programs that use facial recognition that help match photographs of criminals faces to the criminal. Another program that we use helps prevent suicide bombers from attacking. Some people may think that prevention of terrible events reoccuring or occurring is a good thing, but using security systems everywhere may be a violation of their rights and privacy.

Read More
1482 Words | 6 Pages

This book explains how the NSA was able to detect the two terrorists, and how this led to breaking the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Which only limited them to spying on enemies outside the country, but after 9/11 they had abandoned this policy and began spying within the United States. Bamford illustrates that after 9/11, the NSA had access to an infinite amount of data, and they used this access without obtaining any legal documentation from courts. This process, as Bamford termed it, “warrantless wiretapping”. Meaning the NSA would “wiretap” without consent from the government or anything, violating American laws and even American

Read More
266 Words | 2 Pages

Espionage and the Fourth Amendment are not compatible especially when people get accused for no legitimate reason. After the September 11 terrorist attack on the Twin Towers in New York. George W. Bush issued more policies to expand espionage agencies to ensure that future terrorist attacks can be prevented. Some people might argue that “preventing the loss of American lives requires some restriction of civil liberties” but other people say that “the war on terrorism is different from traditional wars and thus requires that government officials exercise special care to maintain civil liberties” (Espionage and Intelligence Gathering 114). Having civil liberties is one of the few rights that American citizens can have.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More
1085 Words | 5 Pages

The homeland security system of the United States is a large machine. It is an all-encompassing machine that produces copious amounts of intelligence and information. How the information is processed, analyzed and distributed is another mechanism of the machine. There are many civil liberty issues that have recently arisen from post 9/11 policies set in place by previous and current administrations. These issues stem from intelligence collection methods in all facets of collection.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Details will be discussed further in the next argument. 3. The leaking of NSA information made terrorists informed of the counter terrorism measures of the United States of

Read More

More about What Are The Arguments Against Section 702

Related Topics

Open Document