The USA Patriot Act, also known as "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism" was a rushed act passed 45 days after the devastating terrorist attack on the twin towers September 11th, 2001. It was composed with the intention of finding and prosecuting international terrorists on American soil, but consequently violated the constitution. In addition, the Patriot act allows surveillance on all emails, internet, and cell phones to try and catch terrorists. Regardless, the act ended up having more power than primarily planned as stated in the CNN debate on the patriot act. America was founded on the principle of individual liberties and the pursuit of happiness in the context
Introduction Signed into law on 26 October 2001, the US Patriot Act was meant to strengthen security controls and provide Americans with an opportunity to act in the defense of their freedom. Caused by the September 11 terrorist attacks, this rule was intended to help Americans protect themselves from future similar strikes. However, since its enactment 16 years ago, this legislation has provided a veil with which impunity and civil rights violators can hide behind as they perpetrate crime in the name of national security. The act augmented safety and intelligence agencies' powers to acquire confidential information.
It is intended, in Bush’s words, to "enhance the penalties that will fall on terrorists or anyone who helps them." Although the act passed by wide margins in both houses, it has been criticized for weakening civil liberties. Title II (Patriot Act II) contains the most controversial provisions. Title II extends the government’s authority to use wiretaps under the Foreign
The United States of America made a Patriot Act which it was signed by President George W. Bush with the Act of Congress on October 26, 2001. It was titled a ten-letter backronym that stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001”. In the essay will bring up defending or advocating the merits of the Patriot Act. Secondly, will talk about does the Patriot Act falls within the purview of the U.S. Constitution. Lastly, will talk about the suggest methods with the perceived racial/religious bias.
One group that argues this is the American Civil Liberties Union, which strongly disagrees with the Patriot Act. They have stated that investigations into the Patriot Act, “reveal thousands of violations of law,” (ACLU), while this is simply not true. One controversial piece of the Patriot Act are roving wiretaps. These allow government investigators to follow and put surveillance on certain people, rather than certain devices, so that they may save time and effort. According to Nathan Sales, a law professor at George Mason University, “Federal courts agree that Title III’s roving wiretaps authority is constitutional and… provides strong support for constitutionality,” (Sales).
The USA PATRIOT Act stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. " This bill was signed into law with little debate on October 26, 2001, only 45 days after the attacks that rocked our country. The vote in favor of the law was overwhelming and bi-partisan – 98 to 1 in the US Senate and 357 to 66 in the US House of Representatives. Yet, the bill was 342 pages long, and many members of Congress now say they did not even read it before voting in favor. Author Steven Brill (2003) asserts in his book, After: Rebuilding and Defending America in the September 12 Era, that the version of the USA PATRIOT Act voted on by Congress was not the bill that had been approved in committee
A highly successful program of the Patriot Act in reducing the threat of homegrown terrorism is through the increased attack on fraudulent money laundering. By targeting money laundering, the primary source of funding for terrorist organizations is effectively reduced. This act also expanded other forms of surveillance as well, increasing the authorization for wiretaps and searches by requiring very little evidence to enable one. The act further relaxes pre-measures for the invasion of US residents with the “Sneak and Peak” provision which allows law enforcement to search a suspect’s home without immediately notifying them, potentially for months (“Is the USA Patriot Act Necessary”, 2005). The USA Patriot Act played a huge role in setting current standards for immigrant treatment, “Once it became statutory, the Act gave the legal authorities the unfettered right to detain foreigners for an unlimited length of time, based solely on distrust, without the detainees having due process of law” (Smith, C. S., & Hung, L., 2010, p. 32).
The USA Patriot Act is an acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. The USA Patriot Act was passed by Congress as a reaction to the fear based oppressor assaults of September 11, 2001. The Act permits government authorities more prominent expert in following and blocking interchanges, both for motivations behind law authorization and remote insight gathering. It gives the Secretary of the Treasury administrative forces to battle debasement of US budgetary foundations for outside tax evasion purposes; it all the more effectively attempts to close our outskirts to remote fear mongers and to confine and evacuate those inside our fringes; it builds up new violations,
The U.S. PATRIOT Act was passed on October 26, 2011. This act gives extensive powers to “federal investigators to track down suspected terrorists and spoil any future terrorist attacks in the United States” (Uddin, 2014). While there are both opponents and supporters of this act, it mainly seems to cause controversy as news stories chronicle the latest pros and mostly cons regarding the topic. When first passed, supporters said that the provisions would enhance information sharing. Detractors, however, said that “unrestricted sharing could lead to the development of databases about citizens who are not targets of criminal investigations” (Abramson & Godoy, 2005).
The Patriot Act is able to know everything about us from the things deleted to the people we call and have a conversation with. While this sounds scary and like we have no privacy at all this is actually helping us out in the long run. Patriot Act allows law enforcement to conduct investigations and find dangerous people such as
The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on October 26, 2001, by President Bush. The USA Patriot Act is an acronym that stands for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act.” The theory behind the USA Patriot Act is to provide law enforcement with the “unprecedented ability to search, seize, detain and eavesdrop in their pursuit of possible terrorists (Orthmann & Hess, 2013). The USA Patriot Act was extended by President Obama signing a four-year extension of the Act.
I am in favor of the patriot ACT. I know many people think, it is kind of violation of the privacy, but the patriot ACT make the U.S. a better place to live. There are countries, which try to do some damage to the U.S., and they will do anything to accomplish it. The patriot ACT made it easier for the law enforcement whenever they needed to arrest someone, whether is a drug dealer, a terror organization or someone who tries to make some damages through technology. These acts can have huge impact on the people and the society, law enforcement should act faster than the enemies in order to get them before they get what they want.
The Patriot Act, sounds like the title of a really corny comic book. However it is actually an act enforced by the U.S. government that allows certain things be done, like people's phone calls to be recorded in or social media kept under watch, order to protect citizens from possible terrorists. This is a controversial topic due to people believing their rights are being taken away. I think that claim is totally proposterous seeing as how it protects said people from future terrorist attacks. With that idea, how can you argue against the point and uses of the Patriot Act?
The Act also touched on arrest, detention and, charging of terrorist suspects. The Act sought to address security and legal loopholes exploited before 9/11. The Act has been instrumental in the protection of the country by providing tools and power required to combat terrorism, facilitating cooperation between security agencies and helping in reviewing threats and associated punishments for those found guilty of misdeeds and terroristic
On September 11th, 2001, tragedy struck America. A terrorist attack was carried out resulting in 2,753 Americans killed. America became locked in a war, and it needed more security on its own soil. So, congress passed a law known as the Patriot Act. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records, phone calls and other surveillance.
