ipl-logo

Congress Vs House Of Representatives Essay

544 Words3 Pages

The Federalist argued that Congress, specifically the House of Representatives would be able to gain the confidence and sympathy of the people. In Federalist 52, Madison writes: “As it is essential to liberty that the government in general, should have a common interest with the people; so it is particularly essential that the branch of it under consideration, should have an immediate dependence on, & an intimate sympathy with the people.” Biannual elections, therefore, were key to the “intimate sympathy” that the Members of the House were supposed to have with the people. The House of Representatives would allow the rights and interest of the people to be protected in the way it carries out its elections. Although the Federalist did argue that all men will pursue their own ambitions, the representatives would be elected by a large variety of individuals, allowing the people to have the final say on the election of the representatives. Aside from the large number of electors, biannual election allows enough time necessary for the representatives to form the right judgment. Collectively, these ideas of election ensures that the voice of the people would be heard in the government, while at the same time checking for those ambitious representatives. …show more content…

Anti-Federalist claimed that because the Constitution could make laws that for common defense and general welfare. In addition, the supremacy clause further removed the protection the states provided for the people by declaring all laws made by the United States supreme law of the land. The general welfare act rendered the government with absolute power to enact anything they saw fit and proper, which would slowly, thanks to the supremacy clause, annihilate the powers of the

Show More
Related
265 Words | 2 Pages

Anti-federalists believed that vague clauses had given the government power that was unapproved

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

Under the Article of Confederation each state were able to obtain their own legislation that address to their states citizen’s rights. Contrast to the Constitution, it does not address individual’s rights. Instead, it mainly list legislative powers. The Federalist believed that under these restriction in the Constitution over the government was sufficient enough to protect individual’s rights.

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

The Articles of Confederation explicitly stated in Article 5 that, “delegates shall be annually appointed in such manner as the legislatures of each State shall direct, to meet in Congress” (Articles of Con. , art. V). Because Congressional Representatives were chosen by the State legislators and not by the citizens, this political system was not nearly as democratic as the Constitution, in which the voting citizenry directly elected their delegates in the House of Representatives. It was especially important that Americans elect their House delegates because the Constitution stated that, “all Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives” (US Const.

Read More
288 Words | 2 Pages

What were our Founder's intentions for Congress and Congressional elections? The founders created the United States Congress to protect the rights of individual states and safeguard minority opinion in a system of government designed to give greater power to the national government.   How did they see Congress relative to the President, and how is this dynamic playing out, especially with our understanding of Congress, elections and representation? They saw them as the word of the people. Today most people don’t see them like this or even at all.

Read More
133 Words | 1 Pages

Federalist’s ideas about functions of the central government encompassed a national appeal that influenced adoption of the constitution. They convinced the delegates that a strong national government was capable of ensuring equitable resource sharing. By quoting the gaps in the Articles of Confederation, the Federalists expressed the concern that passing the constitution would address the highlighted inefficacies to make American a sustainable nation. Also, Federalists were open to new ideas including the consideration of the bill of rights. Contrariwise, the Antifederalists did not prosper in the mission to convince the delegates to oppose the constitution that provided supreme powers to the national government (Hamilton, Madison and Jay 67).

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

This led the Anti-federalists to argue that the federal government should be limited to issues of national defense and interstate commerce and all other powers to the state. The Anti-federalists believed this plan granted the national government undue economic power over the states. Anti-Federalists found many problems in the Constitution. They saw no sense in throwing out the existing government.

Read More
540 Words | 3 Pages

The constitution allows the federal government to pass taxes, raise an army, and regulate the nation commerce. This oppose the foundation belief of an anti-federalist. By passing the Constitution to grant the federal government more powers, it defeated

Read More
706 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists thought that the people may be tricked into voting against the common good because they were not politicians; this was pretty much their only argument. The Anti-Federalists had the most reasons and evidence as to why the people should elect their own representatives. To balance the power the people now had, being able to elect their own representatives, the Congress now elects the

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

Their belief was that the government would have too much power. The Anti-Federalists were satisfied with the way the Constitution was. The Anti-federalists thought that states should have more rights, that there should be a Bill of rights. They

Read More
1145 Words | 5 Pages

Therefore, the Anti-Federalists purported a government with a weak central government which was to be used solely for the purpose of foreign affairs, foreign trade, and similar matters while the states would be left to govern their territories and their citizens as they saw best. This form of government would have created a federation of states, similar to the government created by the Articles of Confederation, with a marginal increase in the power of the federal government. The Anti-Federalists believed that any power which was exercised by the federal government would need to be in writing and the criteria whereby the federal government could use these powers would also need to be in writing. This school of thought led to the inclusion of enumerated powers in the Constitution. The desires of the Anti-Federalists, as stated by Gordon Lloyd, were, “… Congress was limited to powers expressly granted, the states qua states were represented equally regardless of the size of their population, and the amending of [the constitution] required the unanimous consent of the state legislatures”

Read More
185 Words | 1 Pages

Federalism is the different types of principle that the government enforce law to ensure the safety for citizen and non citizens. Paragraph 2 of the Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally the supremacy clause can also overtake the state laws and even state constitutions. The founding fathers decide to use federalism as a way to control the people and their actions, they believed that governmental power inevitably poses as a threat to individual citizens for life and liberty because some states may abuse their power so the government decide to make laws to prevent states from taking too much power. only the federal government can intervene with

Read More
1089 Words | 5 Pages

he Anti-Federalists were centered around two fundamental things; making an oppressive government and absence of individual power on the off chance that the focal government turned out to be all the more intense (Kaminski et al 3). They held the conviction that the Constitution gave the focal government a great deal of forces through the lawmaking body, legal and official. They were of the contention that, much the same as King George III, the official would be onerous to the general population as opposed to ensuring their individual rights. In supporting their claim, the counter Federalists contended that Americans had been included in a grisly and exceedingly expensive progressive clash to wind up free from British run the show. Setting themselves in a place like that of an unregulated government would not be valuable to the eventual fate of the country.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

The Anti-federalist had apprehensions about the potential loss of sovereignty through the power the national government was given in the proposed Constitution; along with the effects of a loss to the nation and it's people. The Anti-federalist belief was that through state sovereignty, the needed restraints would keep the national government from falling into total control of a federal government, protecting the

Read More
545 Words | 3 Pages

The Senate and House of Representatives comprise the two chambers of the United States Congress. While both houses are representative bodies and jointly oversee the executive branch, both must approve all bills before the president, but both chambers have different roles according to the Constitution. The House of Representatives has 435 members apportioned to the house from across the United States. States with larger populations receive more seats within the house.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Childhood fears and adult traumas are stored differently in the brain than happy memories. They are buried like porous capsules deep in the primitive regions, below awareness and beyond easy reach of conscious thinking and talking. They are buried so deep that they are separated from the normal flow of life, and so time cannot work its natural healing powers. There is a vast psychological literature on the diverse ways people are held back by these hidden capsules. Often, they don’t feel fully grounded or empowered.

Read More

More about Congress Vs House Of Representatives Essay

Related Topics

Open Document