ipl-logo

Consensus In Jesse Vandelaar's 'Letter To The Editor'

635 Words3 Pages

Consensus; noun, “to build a plan of action acceptable by all.” (Source 1). Consensus sounds remarkable on paper, but putting the plan into action is a complete different story much like lower taxes, free college, and raising minimum wage. Consensus may be acceptable in some situations but consensus all the time is just irrational.

To begin with, consensus would not work for everything. For example the public, or the counsel, may not even be versed in the issue they are forming a consensus for or it may even be a discussion pointless to discuss. Jesse VandeLaar, in his letter to the editor, makes a compelling point, in brief, he states that having a supreme figure, such as an administrator, should be making decisions simply because of their …show more content…

Parent Mary Anne Dunlap in her letter to the editor declares,”A plan that has taken into consideration the opinions and interests of all the members- and survived extensive debate- is a plan that will stand the test of time.” While the plan may have survived extensive debate, that does not supply a justification whether or not it is appropriate for it to even be up for consensus at all, much less that the plan does not compromise the beliefs of the citizens on its behalf. uniqueness. Source two define consensus as, “when a group of people reach a general agreement.” Although the council does have a say in everything and all the ideas get meshed together, creativeness and having different views is not a sin. Consensus may work in some predicaments but insisting it works in all is preposterous.

When all is said and done, consensus is not the most effective strategy for decision making, it suppresses creativity, is rarely suitable, and compromises morals and values. In order to be successful, coming up with a resolution should be focused on the whites and blacks rather than the greys. Some things are better kept on paper like consensus

Show More
Related
349 Words | 2 Pages

COP21 which was held on Nov. 330 th 2015 and lasted two weeks aimed to devise a legally binding agreement to cap global temperature rises to under 2 degrees Celsius, below preindustrial levels. Negotiations and agreements which have been brewing over several years, were finally settled in a time efficient and effective conference, hosting 196 parties which all participated in the agreement to decrease the use of fossil fuels which result in the development of greenhouse gases by 2050. The agreement functions upon the framework that each nation is to establish a conformable and realistic reduction target individually, with no penalty present for countries which fail to abide by their self‐imposed targets. Wealthy developed nations like the United

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

An example of this is that Adams wanted to appoint john Jay, but he said no saying that the court lacked “energy, weight, and dignity to support the government,” (86). Not only was turnover for resigning was very high, but sometimes they didn’t assemble enough people so many cases were carried over or canceled. Even through all the struggles of being looked down upon, not enough people wanting to take part, and people trying to overturn him John Marshall stood victorious. He changed the perceived appearance of the judges, coagulated the court, and having the court speak at one. “Marshall participated in 42 of the 46 court cases, and in those he wrote the court’s opinion,” (86).

Read More
1241 Words | 5 Pages

In order to uphold the constitution, the Supreme Court must always aim to balance power among the branches of government and not overstep boundaries in exercising its own power. For this reason, the debate over handling political questions in the courtroom

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Erin Rall History 113 Professor Townsend 11/14/15 Missouri Statehood: Compromise or Conflict According to Oxford Dictionaries, compromise is defined as an agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions (Oxford University Press). Although compromise is usually the best solution to resolve a conflict, it does not always work.

Read More
465 Words | 2 Pages

If the president appeals to one set of interests over another, unwanted circumstances can arise. Commonly, the president would want to consider the public opinion which usually

Read More
648 Words | 3 Pages

This is evident since the judicial branch cannot enforce power, it cannot approach matters, but matters have to seek the judiciary, and public opinion influences the court’s decisions to a great extent. When the President and Congress think that

Read More
598 Words | 3 Pages

In her response lecture, Professor West identifies two very significant inconsistencies in Dr. Scott's lecture on the Judiciary. Professor West says, "You can tell a lot about a teacher by what they lecture. You can also tell a lot about a teacher by what they don't lecture or what they leave out"(West, 2:27). This idea is very apparent when it comes to Dr. Scott's lecture. Not only does Dr. Scott leave out some very vital information in his lectures, but he provides misinformation and makes contradictory points in his lecture.

Read More
2308 Words | 10 Pages

All things considered, Mark Sutherland has brought together a provocative corps of respected scholars and legal thinkers who collectively offer an incisive critique of a judiciary gone awry while they offer constructive solutions for reform. They make it abundantly clear that we the American people do not have to be slaves to the edicts of these black-robed deities. Their adroit assessment of the federal judiciary is intelligent, rooted in a principled esteem for the rule of law and constitutional popular rule, and their solutions are constitutional defensible, practical and tenable. One thing is resoundingly clear, we must stand up to these demigods in block robes that contravene the design of our federal republic and offer outlandish decisions at odds with the will of the vast majority of the people. It is paramount that the American people awaken and voice their discontent to their elected representatives in Congress if we are to abate judicial tyranny.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

All human beings are born different from each other and likewise, can act different from one another. It is through pausing and reflecting that one finds freedom. When straying away from a crowds ideals, more balanced decision making can be made. Analyse of a situation must be done by the individual and not the group to ensure that a person’s moral values trump any opposing group values. Hence, the number of people that may agree is completely irrelevant.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

Both parties must be willing to collaborate to resolve these conflicts. If conflicts are resolved, it would improve communication and build

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

What Political men and women need to decide is what is going to improve us as a nation and keep us as one. It is obvious that not everyone will always agree on things, and see eye to eye. That’s life though and to succeed we must stick together and more forward with our

Read More
762 Words | 4 Pages

Meeting The meeting I choice was a city council meeting in Springdale Ar. The meeting was on October 13, 2015 6:00pm. The city of Springdale hold meeting every two weeks at the same time and place. Group Concepts Membership

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

While I stand firmly in my beliefs, no matter how I feel on the topic, I will take my argument as far in the other direction as I needed to ensure the other side is faithfully represented. I’ve carried this desire for compromise and cooperation with me, and I’ve tried to lead others down the same path. In a school where many students are so sure that their collection of beliefs is correct that they neglect the merits of any other contrasting ideas, and in a community that, despite its diversity, seems to promote the voices of only a specific demographic, I became frustrated with

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

Psychologist Irving Janis explained some alarmingly bad decisions made by governments and businesses coined the term "groupthink”, which he called "fiascoes.” He was particularly drawn to situations where group pressure seemed to result in a fundamental failure to think. Therefore, Janis further analyzed that it is a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members ' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. According to Janis, groupthink is referred as the psychological drive for consensus at any cost that suppresses disagreement and prevents the appraisal of alternatives in cohesive decision-making groups.

Read More
1315 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, reasons of agreement are safety concerns and maintaining the order of society. On the opposite side, a cause

Read More

More about Consensus In Jesse Vandelaar's 'Letter To The Editor'

Related Topics

Open Document