ipl-logo

Constitution Founded For The Elite Essay

472 Words2 Pages

A Constitution Founded For The Elite. Elitism is defined by Webster’s dictionary as, “leadership or rule by an elite.” I think this is a perfect definition of our constitution. When you take an in depth look at who created our constitution and their intentions, you can see that our constitution was created with the elites as top priority. Therefore, making the power elite theory, the best theory to describe the constitution. The names you think of when you think about the founding of the constitution are, John Locke, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson, to name a few. All these men were members of the elite class, at the time, in America. I believe the reason the constitution was made to favor the elite, because it was establish by the elite. One of delegates …show more content…

They were apprehensive of a government ruled by the people. “The delegates wished to represent the public through better-educated, wealthier, and more experienced leaders- men like themselves” (Morone, 58). A horrifying but true representation of what the founders had envisioned for America. The most blatant act of elitism shows in the way they organized our voting system. Only white males who owned land were granted the right to vote. Even though they preferred the idea of the “well educated” elite to be the only citizen with the right to vote, they didn’t feel they could put full dependence on these men either. So they created the Electoral College so if the people “made a mistake” the electors could fix it, again taking the power away from the people and resting it back to the elite. They also created polices that were purely to benefitted the wealthy, like the three-fifths compromise. A policy that benefitted wealthy slave owners by counting each slave as three-fifths of a person in order to give them more seats in the house of representatives. Therefore, giving the elite even more power in

Show More
Related
656 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution was based on Federalist ideas of a strong central government with Hamilton’s economic plan of a national bank and high tariffs.. However, anti-federalist’s leaders, Jefferson and Madison, believed that Hamilton’s economic plan will benefits the affluents. As a result, the anti-federalist disapprove the constitution since it damages their agriculture’s

Read More
616 Words | 3 Pages

The Public's opinion of the Constitution was divided into two separate groups known as the Federalists and the Antifederalists. Many of not all Federalists were wealthy and well educated with leaders like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin. They were people who advocated a proposal or theory that of an orderly, efficient government could protect their economic status. The Federalists were also very well organized, also in many of the states they were often in control of the elections of ratifying

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

In the late 1700’s, it was America’s goal to create a republic that had a representative government that was based upon the approval of the people. Unfortunately, the people feared a strong central government because of the previous trouble the colonies had when they were ruled by Britain. They were always being unfairly taxed and had very few rights. In order to avoid this, a very weak government was developed that seemed to satisfy the people, but would not satisfy the well being of the country. It wasn’t until Shay’s rebellion which brought light to the fact that the Articles of Confederation were not going to cut it, so the Constitutional Convention was created and convened to find an alternative solution which was the creation of the Constitution.

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Perhaps the most famous Federalist paper, Federalist 10, starts off by saying that one of the biggest arguments that favors the Constitution is that it creates a government suited to minimize the harm caused by factions. Faction, in this case, is defined as a group of people whether a minority or majority based on class, race, and profession that all share a common interest. It was inevitable that factions would occur and perhaps the defining characteristic was the unequal distribution of property. This would ultimately lead the poor without property to become the majority in a “tyranny of the masses.” Madison believed that there were two solutions in preventing majority factions, 1) Remover the causes, and 2) Control the effects.

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

The Federalist did not believe ordinary men could be trusted to elect men of character: Cosmopolitan men. The process intended, was with fewer men to be elected the people would vote for the most prominent man, most often of aristocratic birth; however, the distinction of a Cosmopolitan man was becoming more blurred as the social lines were less defined after the Revolution. The decision to take power from the local government and give it to the more liberal central government started with the Federalist movement and has been evoked throughout American’s

Read More
663 Words | 3 Pages

Federalists were supporters of a strong central government that included certain measures to limit the power of the masses, such as the electoral college. Since their ideas so harshly contrasted with those expressed in the Articles of Confederation, they decided to draft an entirely new Constitution that would satisfy their ideas and goals for government. However, even though they wanted to limit the extent to which the government was truly democratic, they still needed the support of

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

The framers at the Constitution Convention believed that the president should be indirectly voted for. The framers thought the citizens were not smart enough and were uninformed to be able to elect their own leader. They knew their leader had to be chosen in an informed process that would consider the desires of every citizen without giving away too much power to one group. The delegates did not trust that the voters had enough information to be able to vote on their own. This lead to the creation of the Electoral College.

Read More
390 Words | 2 Pages

In his essay ‘The founding fathers: a reform caucus in action', John P. Roche describes the Founding Fathers as practical politicians that were indeed acting on behalf the citizens they represented. Roche states the founding fathers kept in mind everyone's rights while making the Constitution. He explains how James Madison drafted the Virginia Plan. Roche describes it as a ‘Political Masterstroke'.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

To them, it was clear that the Articles of Confederation were not upholding America, and therefore, America could not succeed. While they did to some extent listen to the fears of the Antifederalists—as is evidenced by the passing of the Bill of Rights—they altogether tended to be more optimistic when it came to the Constitution. One of the founding principles of the Federalist Party was their support of a strong central government. A strong central government would provide needed stability, more so than the Articles of Confederation ever could. The Federalists were also generally less concerned with ensuring individual’s rights, as many of them felt it was the government’s duty to serve the people, and such rights did not need to be formally written because they should already be in place.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

In addition to this argument, they thought that the states wouldn’t really need to be heavily represented, because the stronger government would “unite” the individual states. Again, notable historical figures were in the group including Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, and George

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Many kids can reflect from what they did do in the past. Many times humans do mistakes especially since they are kids and their minds are not set as well as how adults are even though I do think everyone does know what they are doing. The reason I do believe this is because in the article Greg Ousley Is Sorry for Killing His Parents it explains,”After earning his high-school equivalency and attending nearly every anger- and stress-management workshop the penal system had to offer, he pursued a bachelor's degree in liberal arts through Indiana State University’s correspondence program“(Anderson, page 4). The explanation why I put this quote was because in the article Greg does realize he did do something wrong and wants to make it up but getting

Read More
919 Words | 4 Pages

In Richard Connell’s famous short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” irony is an important literary device that drives the reader through the narrative, making them more invested. Connell uses irony at the beginning to create an ironic twist where Rainsford, the original hunter, becomes the hunter. The persuasive author not only uses irony to create a suspenseful twist, but he also uses it to satisfy the reader when the unexpected win of Rainsford becomes real. Richard Connell’s genius literary techniques have inspired many modern-day creators with their work in the professional industry. Suzanne Collins is one specific writer who was inspired by Connell and turned this inspiration into her brilliant novel, “The Hunger Games,” which has impacted

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

The Founding Fathers: An Age of Realism Richard Hofstadter once said, “A properly deigned state, the Fathers believed, would check interest with interest, class with class, faction with faction, and one branch of government with another in a harmonious system of mutual frustration”. He acknowledges that the Founding Fathers of the USA believe that a properly designed government cancelled out the powerful with power and did not let anyone get ahead. The Founding Fathers believed this because of their experience with human nature. The men who drew up the Constitution believed that “men are selfish and contentious”, and this is why they felt that men cannot and should not govern themselves (in the form of a democracy).

Read More
885 Words | 4 Pages

They believed that because people are instinctively selfish, that people would have a hard time coexisting in a land where all people were supposed to be treated equal. Though the government was created to aid the people, it was also established to teach the people how to “live properly”. The fact that the constitution was written in the mindset that people needed to be, in a sense, controlled is was and remains a controversial topic. Many view the constitution’s favor for the rich, white, and male property owners was not so much of an “easier way to unify a nation” but more of a list of who it was going to be more desireable to govern. These facts aside, in order to instill equality to a newlywed nation, the people were given some basic human rights and the power to choose who was going to represent them in order to still make sure that the people were still the basis of the new government while still having control over them.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Constitution Founded For The Elite Essay

Related Topics

Open Document