ipl-logo

Constitution Pros And Cons

687 Words3 Pages

The new Constitutions indeed needed to produce a bicameral legislature for our country because there was a great difference between the amounts of power the larger states would have as opposed to the smaller states. And being that framers wanted equal power or all states, something that to be done. The Article of Confederation Provisions gave us a unicameral (one house) Congress which means each state would be counted or one vote regardless of the population. This plan of course was not in favor of the smaller states because it gave them a disproportionate power in lawmaking. For this reason, a convention was called in order to determine what was to be done in order to balance the votes. Members of the Virginia delegates however loved the way …show more content…

This plan proposed a national government consisting of three branches, a legislature, and executive, and a judiciary. The legislature would consist of two houses, with memebership in each house , and the members of that house would then choose memebers of the second house. The legislature would have the power to choose a chief executive and members of the judiciary, as well as the authority to legislate in “all cases to which the states are imcompetent” or when the “harmony of the United States” demands it. Lastly, the legislature would be a Council of Revision, consisting of the executive and several members of the judiciary , which could veto the legislature’s acts. The smaller states also wanted a say on the amount of power they believed they should have as well. With that being said, delegates from the less populated states proposed the New Jersey Plan. This plan called for a one-house legislature in which each state, regardless of size, would have equal representation. It provided for a national judiciary and an executive committee chosen by the legislature. The Plan expanded the power s of Congress to include the power to levy taxes and regulate foreign and interstate

Show More
Related

Compare And Contrast The Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan

309 Words | 2 Pages

In 1978, two plans were put forth regarding how each state in the union would be represented in the national legislature. The two plans put forth were the, “Virginia Plan” (which favored big states), and the “New Jersey Plan.” (which favored small states) Edmund Randolph of Virginia proposed the Virginia plan. The plan laid out a system in which states would be represented in the national legislature based on their population and/or by how much revenue they contributed to the national government.

Read More

Difference Between Virginia And New Jersey Plan

1276 Words | 6 Pages

In Virginia plan some of the specific powers include, that the national legislature to consent in all situations to which the separate states are unskilled or in which United States consistency may be disturbed by the claim of individual regulation and also assign inferior tribunals. The executive has the power to carry into execution of national laws, and to adverse any legislative act which shall not be passed after wards unless through permission from two third of each branch of national legislature. The judiciary has the power to handle all the circumstances regarding collection of national revenue, impeachment of any state, officers and questions that comprise of national coherence. In New Jersey plan some of the powers that are presented are partially similar to those in Virginia plans but not completely

Read More

The Three-Fifths Of The Virginia Plan At The Constitutional Convention

433 Words | 2 Pages

(2) The creation of an unspecified national executive, elected by the legislature. (3) The creation of a national judiciary, appointed by the legislature" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 41). Moreover, the New Jersey differs from the Virginia Plan in that it was "simply an amendment of the Articles of Confederation [and] its only notable features was its reference to the supremacy doctrine, which was later included in the Constitution" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 42). Despite this difference both plans are important as they helped reach an

Read More

The Virginia Plan, And Connecticut Compromise

516 Words | 3 Pages

Ernst 24). The plan included 15 proposals and traced the outline of what would become the United States Constitution. In addition to the bicameral legislature, the plan also requested that the government be separated into three branches, the executive, legislative, and judicial. Virginia’s plan also would have given…” congressional representation in both chambers of Congress according to each state’s population, which would have given larger states like Virginia greater political representation” (Frantzich, Stephen E.; Howard R. Ernst 24).

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Virginians And The Confederation Government

728 Words | 3 Pages

These men being known as the founding fathers The Virginia plan was to create a government consisted of what Edmond Randolph proposed that the national government be compiled of a supreme, legislative, executive and judiciary. It was also consisted of 2 houses. The lower house would represent states with the largest population. The members of the upper house would be elected by the lower house making the smaller states have little or no representation in the upper house at all.

Read More

Virginia Plan Vs New Jersey Plan Essay

537 Words | 3 Pages

In the creating of the US Constitution, the creators hit many roadblocks. It was difficult for the state delegates to decide on much, especially because they were biased and in favor of their own states. The New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan were two examples of the disagreement of representation within the states in the legislative branch. The New Jersey Plan was in favor of equal representation throughout the states. The Virginia Plan was in favor of population representation, meaning the larger states would have more representation than the smaller states.

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

1266 Words | 6 Pages

The debate for the proposals of the Constitution lasted a long period of time because the States did not agree with the proposals. Compromise was needed in this situation because the Convention would have taken longer than expected. With compromise, the structure of the national legislature was finally formed after months of debates. The plan was adopted: five states agreed, four states disagreed, and two states did not vote. With Rhode Island’s vote, the debates no longer had to to continue.

Read More

The Virginia Compromise

575 Words | 3 Pages

The Virginia Plan was an idea to organize two chambers for a legislative branch. Each states would be portrayed by numbers. States with a vast population would win over a small state due to representation. Larger states will most likely find this more optimal than small states because of the community.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

584 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 brought politicians from different states together in order to create a more complex and centralized form of government. The Virginia Plan was brought forward by James Madison, a representative of Virginia, who wanted to create a more centralized and powerful national government, that would benefit the larger states if it was implemented. The main political dilemma was to construct a central government that would provide the necessary national goods without interfering or endangering the power of the states. Some of the issues discussed at the Convention that were brought forward by the representatives were congressional representation, the appointment of House seats, the national assumption of state debts, the regulation of tariffs and the presidential powers, which were later on incorporated in what is known today as the Constitution.

Read More

Essay On The Great Compromise

298 Words | 2 Pages

The plan proposed by Virginia otherwise known as the “large-state plan.” Which proposed “a bicameral legislature, in which the lower house would be elected proportionately and the upper house would be selected from a list of nominees sent from the state legislatures on the basis of equal representation for the states. ”(add footnote) As the smaller states feared that this plan would lose a voice in the federal government if they continued with the Virginia plan, they opposed this plan and came up with one for themselves which would be known as the “small-state plan.” The small-state plan would propose “a unicameral Congress, with equal representation for each state, with all the powers of the Confederation Congress.

Read More

The Constitutional Convention And The Great Compromise

168 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitutional Convention was arranged for the “purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation” (208). As a result, it was concluded that the power of this great nation should fall in the hands of a “direct authority” rather than within each state (209). Additionally, the national government must provide the Constitution as the representation of the people’s voice and their rights. Consequently, the New Jersey plan became in effect in which equal representation amongst the states in a “unicameral (one-house)” (210).

Read More

An Essay On The Virginia Plan

499 Words | 2 Pages

Leading up to the convention, each state was independent and governed itself. Influential people such as, James Madison did not believe this was the best way to govern. Therefore, Madison wanted to combine the states and place them under one national government. By doing so, the government is now more powerful than the states. On the other hand, the New Jersey Plan wanted to allow the states to remain independent, but have a national government for large issues (SAS Curriculum Pathways).

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq

1372 Words | 6 Pages

One such heated debate involved the topic of representation in the new government. Under the Articles of Confederation there was a simple “one-state, one-vote” policy (The Articles of Confederation, n.d.). In framing the new Constitution, many of the larger states wanted this to be changed to a proportional concept. The delegates from these states argued that due to their larger areas they contributed in greater amount to the nation than did the smaller states, and should therefore have a greater representation and influence. The Constitutional Convention already agreed that the number of delegates in the House of Representatives, being elected by popular vote, should be in proportion to the number of people they represent.

Read More

American Revolution Dbq

638 Words | 3 Pages

Numerous thoughts were proposed amid the drafting of the constitution however maybe none as vital as that of balanced governance. This thought is exemplified in James Madison's The Federalist. He additionally does this by demonstrating that the legislature must have fundamental measures to control itself. Both of the thoughts he bolsters in his paper show that he was an extraordinary supporter of the endorsement of

Read More

The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

1593 Words | 7 Pages

Obviously, smaller states were not pleased with that plan. They thought that larger states could easily overrule them in congress. So William Paterson created a plan called the New Jersey Plan. It as well had the same three branches but, the plan provided legislators to have only one house. Each state would only one vote in the legislator, regardless of the population.

Read More

More about Constitution Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document