ipl-logo

Constitution Pros And Cons

687 Words3 Pages

The new Constitutions indeed needed to produce a bicameral legislature for our country because there was a great difference between the amounts of power the larger states would have as opposed to the smaller states. And being that framers wanted equal power or all states, something that to be done. The Article of Confederation Provisions gave us a unicameral (one house) Congress which means each state would be counted or one vote regardless of the population. This plan of course was not in favor of the smaller states because it gave them a disproportionate power in lawmaking. For this reason, a convention was called in order to determine what was to be done in order to balance the votes. Members of the Virginia delegates however loved the way …show more content…

This plan proposed a national government consisting of three branches, a legislature, and executive, and a judiciary. The legislature would consist of two houses, with memebership in each house , and the members of that house would then choose memebers of the second house. The legislature would have the power to choose a chief executive and members of the judiciary, as well as the authority to legislate in “all cases to which the states are imcompetent” or when the “harmony of the United States” demands it. Lastly, the legislature would be a Council of Revision, consisting of the executive and several members of the judiciary , which could veto the legislature’s acts. The smaller states also wanted a say on the amount of power they believed they should have as well. With that being said, delegates from the less populated states proposed the New Jersey Plan. This plan called for a one-house legislature in which each state, regardless of size, would have equal representation. It provided for a national judiciary and an executive committee chosen by the legislature. The Plan expanded the power s of Congress to include the power to levy taxes and regulate foreign and interstate

Open Document