ipl-logo

Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

572 Words3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention took place from May 25th to September 17th, 1787, in the state of Pennsylvania. The Convention was created to revise the Articles of Confederation, and to create a new government. There were many disputes that presented themselves during the Convention, the major arguments being: Federalist vs. Anti-Federalists, Large State vs. Small State, Slavery, and One vs. Multiple Leaders. One debate was versus the Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the constitution, and wanted more power to the central government. The Federalists pushed for the constitution because it would give them more power, mainly because they were the government officials, in the central government. Opposed to the constitution were the Anti-Federalists, who wanted the Bill Of Rights not the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed the Senate would be too powerful and they (the others/ Anti-Federalists) would be oppressed. The Anti-Federalists wanted the same power as the Federalists, and those in the government. The resolution to this argument was putting the Bill of Rights into …show more content…

Small States. The Larger States (Virginia Plan) believed that due to their larger population size they should have more representation in government. Having representatives based on population size means that the larger states would have more votes and say in the government. Where as the smaller states wanted equal representation for every state, instead of based on population size. This is because they wouldn’t be getting as much say in the laws passed and other government happenings, just because their population size is smaller. The resolution was to have Two Houses: Senate and Representatives. The senate was a good compromise for the smaller states, because it gave everyone equal representatives. The representatives worked for the larger states because for every 30,000 people they get another

Show More
Related
616 Words | 3 Pages

Constitutional Convention(1787)- Twelve states participated in the Constitutional Convention held in Philadelphia the summer of 1787. The first thing accomplished at the Convention was the election of George Washington as Convention president. The delegates agreed upon a structure for their government consisting of a Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branch. The next topic tackled was how would the states be represented with the smaller states on one side of the argument and the larger states on the other side. This argument led James Madison to propose the Virginia Plan.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

the small and big states. This compromise was known as “The Great Compromise.” The terms of the compromise was that there would be two chambers of congress, with different forms of representation. In the House of representatives, representation would be dependent of the population of each state. In the Senate, representation would be equal between all states.

Read More
54 Words | 1 Pages

all states were represented equally in the Senate. This made the smaller states happy. In the House of Representatives, representation was based on population. This pleased the bigger states. The Great Compromise settled the method of representation in the legislative branch.

Read More
867 Words | 4 Pages

The Virginia Plan proposed getting rid of the articles all together which would give congress the power to legislate with a two house legislature and would be votes would be based off the population of the state. The New Jersey plan on the other hand wanted to tweak the articles, wanted only a one house legislature, and only allowed each state one vote. Between the two, a compromise was made known simply as the Great Compromise. The issue of representation was solved because a two house legislature was decided upon, the senate would represent the states and the house of representative would be responsible for representing the people equally. Now that the government

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitution was scribed subsequent to the delegation that occurred at the Constitutional Convention, held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. This document was intended to be an improvement of the Articles of Confederation, in which the ending result was an entirely new government called the republic. The idea of institutionalizing a constitution created differences between the participants of the meeting. Those who opposed the idea of a new government and the constitution were called the Antifederalists and those who supported the ratification of the Constitution were federalists, which is the idea of federalism vs. state’s rights. The Constitution failed to protect the rights of the civilians despite Federalists attempts to persuade individuals

Read More
537 Words | 3 Pages

The upper house would be elected by the lower house, thus ensuring that there is always at least one representative in the upper house. The New Jersey Plan preserved an existing unicameral legislature, in which each state would have equal representation. The compromise that was made called for a bicameral legislature, like the 1 Virginia Plan. However, the lower house number of representatives was determined by the size of the state, and the upper house each state had equal representation. This was just part of the Great Compromise, the subject of slavery had divided the Northern and the Southern states.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitutional Convention in 1787 held many problems however, they were resolved. The Constitutional Convention had two questions. How would they strengthen the national government without taking any power from the states? and, How would they balance the interests of both the wealthy and those that aren’t wealthy? 55 men agreed to make a compromise, and therefore the Constitution became a bundle of compromises.

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

Constitution, there was the first form of government the colonist created, the Articles of Confederation, which focused on a weak central government and power in the states. The problem with this type of government was the states where too powerful, it was to the point where it was one state for itself. If there was a situation where a decision of one state benefited itself but could potentially hurt another, that one state would rather choose to help itself. After seeing this glitch, the framers came up with a compromise, the small and large state compromise. The Virginia compromise and New Jersey compromise where two plans that where the foundation of the overall idea of how each state had representation.

Read More
735 Words | 3 Pages

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut compromise, resolved many issues having to do with representation. This agreement was made at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. The debate was between large states and small states. The compromise is the number of representatives in the lower house would be decided according to the population of every state; one representative that is elected for every one thousand residents. This was changed to thirty thousand recently before the constitution was signed.

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

After the countless debates, the Great Compromise was what the convention would come into agreement with representation by population in the House of Representatives “The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one Representative. ”(add footnote) The smaller states were pleased with equal representation in the Senate “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senates from each state and each Senator shall have one vote.”(add

Read More
168 Words | 1 Pages

Furthermore, the Great Compromise was latter decided in which based their elements in the importance of separation of powers in which the people were represented by the House of Representatives while the state legislatures

Read More
1024 Words | 5 Pages

While debating how to set up representation in Congress, the large states wanted Congress representation to be based on population, so they would have more say in the government. The small states wanted each state to have only 2 people represent, so everyone would have an equal say. Together they decided that they would have two houses in congress, called the house of representative and the senate. The house of representatives is based on the states population(Source D), appeasing the large states. The senate had 2 representatives, (Source D).The small state-large state compromise protects against tyranny because it ensures that the large states do not take away power from the small states when it comes to making laws.

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

Three distinguished delegates to the Constitutional Convention rejected the idea of signing the Constitution. Edmund Randolph, who had submitted the Virginia Plan, could not extend his approval of the Constitution as formulated because he thought it assigned disproportionate authority to Congress. Therefore, he issued an inquiry to the delegates to present the Constitution to state governments so that they might advise amendments and modifications. Furthermore, George Mason was discouraged by the Convention 's noncompliance to prohibit the slave trade. Mason was also concerned as the Convention 's refused to implement a bill of rights.

Read More

More about Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document