ipl-logo

Constitutional Convention: Review And Amend The Articles Of 1787

578 Words3 Pages

The topic I chose for my historical analysis paper was the Constitutional Convention. In 1787, delegates joined together to review and amend the Articles of Confederation but the Constitutional Convention went beyond this. The convention lasted from May of 1787 to September of 1787. During these long and strenuous four months, the delegates came together and discussed the future of the country and how it should be governed. They ended up drafting the constitution which is the basis and outline for our country at that time and also today. The constitution plays an enormous role in how our country is set up. Its important to analyze both primary and secondary sources about this convention because it can give us insight to the values and ideas that our country was built on to …show more content…

At this time, slaves were not considered citizens and were being treated horrendously. However, when it came to where they would fall in state representation, there was heavy debate. Since there were more slaves in the south, they wanted them to be counted in the representation numbers so they had more power in congress. The south relied heavily on slaves to fuel their economy which was booming due to crops like cotton and Bri Ramos. I would change this to the full course name: HIST-1483-997 Bri Ramos Use Times New Roman font tobacco. On the other hand, the northern states did not want the enslaved African Americans to count towards representation in government because they did not have as many, making the south more powerful if the slaves were counted. The delegates reached a compromise called the Three-Fifths Compromise which counted each slave as three-fifths of a person for representation purposes. This is just one example of the many compromises that were made at the constitutional convention. Another example of a compromise that was made during this time was the Great

Show More
Related
433 Words | 2 Pages

As mentioned in the module, "Lecture Notes for Chapter 2 The Constitution", the Three-Fifths Compromise or "the three-fifths rule", was put into motion as a way to appease Northern delegates while also preventing the Southern delegates from leaving the convention. The compromise ultimately states, "The three-fifths meant that the House of Representatives and the electoral college would be apportioned in part of the basis of property--specifically, property in slaves" (Bardes, Shelley, Schmidt 42-43). In other words, this referred to slaves in that each one would be counted as three fifths of a person, which benefited slave owners the most as that meant they would have more people from the South when it came to determining the representation in Congress. which is how the interests of Southern states were addressed.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

The Summer of 1787 was written by David O. Stewart as a historical, non-fiction recount of the events leading to the Constitutions adoption hundreds of years ago. David O. Stewart is extremely qualified to put together such a book. Mr. Stewart is a prolific author in matters of politics and history. In addition, Mr. Stewart studied law at Yale, a highly praised institution. From his studies in modern law to reading all 500 pages of James Madison’s notes from the constitutional convention, Mr. Stewart has the motivation and intelligence to effectively narrate the time before the constitutions implementation.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

EXTRA CREDIT: The Three Fifths Compromise was presented at the Constitutional Convention, which was a meeting of states whose delegates were formulating plans for the National government. There were many disputes over the proposals between the large (more populous) and small (less populous) states. One of the major disputes was over the issue of apportionment, which related to the method of distributing and allotting the seats in the House of Representatives based on population. Delegates James Wilson and Roger Sherman proposed the Three Fifths Compromise that counted every five slaves as three individuals in terms of the apportionment of representation and

Read More
49 Words | 1 Pages

The 3/5ths compromise The smaller states wanted more representation in the house but the north argued that if blacks weren 't allowed to vote and didn 't have rights they shouldn 't be counted towards house seats. The compromise stated that every slave counted as 3/5ths of a person towards house

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The southern states wanted to make sure that slaves were counted in the population so that they would be able to have more representation within the government and gave the white slave owners more political clout while the northern states did not agree with slavery they did want their property to be counted (Jillson, 44). Including the slaves in the population made the southern states believe they would then have more power when it came time to elect the President. Having this power would allow them to continue owning slaves and help steer laws in regards to slavery. The southern states relied on slaves to help with much of the work that needed to be done, such as growing and taking care of crops. So for southern states

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

Although the Three-Fifths Compromise responded the issue of slavery, there was no words like slavery or slave appear. This settlement was formed during the constitutional convention and in the Great Compromise that concerned the character of representation in Congress. Because the southern states had huge

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

he Constitutional Convention was composed of men of strong principal; men with firm opinions and the education to support those views. Their patriotism and analytical prowess fueled the Convention and its countless debates, resulting in months of writing and perfecting the document that serves as our nation’s foundation. The delegates’ intensity caused them to continue haggling over details up until just days before the Constitution was completed. Such was the case on September 14th, 1787, a mere three days before the Constitution was sent off for ratification. Several issues were raised for discussion that day, including that of impeachment, the publication of all the proceedings of the lower house of Congress, and the appointment of a national

Read More
145 Words | 1 Pages

Another major debate during the Constitutional Convention was whether or not the slaves should count towards representation in Congress. While most Northern states wanted to abolish slavery completely, the South wanted them to count towards representation, to allow them for more representatives. The North argued that if slaves could not vote, they should not count, while the South debated against this. In the end, the Three Fifths Compromise was suggested and accepted. This Compromise stated that each slave would count as three-fifths of a free white male.

Read More
162 Words | 1 Pages

The three-fifths clause was the most important constitutional compromise because it granted the Southern states more political authority, which the Southerners then used to maintain slavery as an institution in the upcoming decades. The three-fifths clause made it so that three-fifths of a state’s slave population would be used in order to decide how many electoral votes and how many representatives a state could have. It was a compromise between the South (which relied on slaves for its economy) and the North (which had fewer slaves) for the sake of political unity. This clause guaranteed Southern states more political power than Northern States through votes or representation, so that laws would pass that allowed slavery to continue and flourish.

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

One of the compromises made in the Constitutional Convention is the three-fifths compromise. In this compromise, the southerners wanted to add slaves to the population of the state they lived in. If slaves were included in their state’s population, that state would be able to add more representatives in the House of Representatives. Northerners did not agree with that statement because slaves did not have the right to vote. After the delegates compromised, they agreed that only three-fifths of the slave’s population would be counted into the state’s population.

Read More
658 Words | 3 Pages

During the Constitutional Convention, delegates were considering how to distribute representation for each state, consequently, the question regarding whether slaves should be counted towards the population arose. Southern states feared that not counting slaves as a part of their populations would give them less representatives in Congress, thus allowing larger Northern states, like Massachusetts, Virginia, and Pennsylvania to overwhelm, and out vote the South in issues regarding slave trade. Likewise, the North did not want to surrender their population advantage in Congress either. The compromise they reached was set forth in Article 1, Section 2 of the United States constitution. The compromise they reached arbitrarily counted every five slaves as three individuals.

Read More
1897 Words | 8 Pages

What are the Historical Influences of United States Constitution? It is known that people all over the world have come to the United States, to create a better life for their families and themselves. The United States is known for having the best form of government for people to be included and have a say in their beliefs. What many people do not know is, what influenced the United States Constitution and the founding fathers in writing.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

In 1787 a Constitutional Convention was held to revise the Articles of Confederation (AOC). Instead of revising the AOC, they created a brand new constitution. During the convention, several new plans of government were proposed. At the convention, there were two plans. The Virginia plan was the big state plan and called for a bicameral legislature based on population.

Read More
196 Words | 1 Pages

The Constitutional Convention holds an enormous amount of Historic significance to the creation, or rather, the fixing, of government. Before 1787, America had the Articles of Confederation- a often problematic document that also came with some upsides. Representation was by state, and problems were resolved between two groups, state and national, that had the same fundamental powers. The idea was heavily based on foolproofing the government to not be, or evolve into, a tyranny- like the one that they had just made themselves independent from. While good-intentioned, the government needed a unanimous vote from all states to pass anything.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

Abstract In this paper research will be done on the United State Constitution. Seeing if the Constitution is a living or non-living document. Also if the United States Constitution still is a document that the people can live up to with today’s issues, or should the document be rewritten. Knowing that the Constitution is over two hundred years old.

Read More

More about Constitutional Convention: Review And Amend The Articles Of 1787

Open Document