When analyzing the spatial relations of The War on Drugs’ “Holding On” and Sherlock Jr., the audience can explore the continuity and discontinuity within each film that will later suggest different messages and ideas. In “Holding On”, there is a clear line between continuity and discontinuity. There are many instances that the film offers continuity between shots by utilizing the 180-degree line and eyeline match. The 180-degree line can be seen by the audience when the man in the film walks from the left to the right side of the frame when in the pasture headed toward the woods. Then later in the film, the camera makes the 180-degree turn, making the man go from the right to the left side of the frame. Continuity is used here so the audience, despite the 180-degree turn, …show more content…
Discontinuity, on the other hand, is very straightforward in this film because the established shots are not joined together in a fluid and smooth manner. A prime example of discontinuity in “Holding On” is when the film transitioned from a shot of the man sleeping to a shot of two white horses galloping in a field. This method is not technically a soviet montage because the shots were not rapid, but it does present the audience with two shots that seem to have nothing in common. The discontinuity that is being used in this film is ultimately conveying a hidden message.
In Sherlock Jr. there is more of a thin line when it comes to the continuity and discontinuity. The shot/reverse shot and eyeline match method are both utilized in this film regarding its continuity. For instance, there is a shot of Sherlock Jr. looking at the candy in the window then it gets reversed to the point of view