ipl-logo

Corruption Depicted In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

444 Words2 Pages

Julius Caesar, one of the humblest leaders of Rome, may have been misread. Throughout his brief leadership of Rome, Julius Caesar has done many things that made people of Rome suspicious of his moral intentions. These people that had their suspicions in Caesar became the conspirators that killed him. Some of the things that Julius did were Julius refused the crown of Rome, he did not let the citizens of Rome persuade his decision about Publius Cimber, and he also refused to listen to the people who told him about the conspiracy. In Acts 1-2, Julius Caesar refused the crown not only once but three times. If Caesar were to take the crown people would have interpreted this in many ways. A crown symbolizes power and immortality. These are qualities that would have made the conspirators really believe that he was not fit to be king. Caesar not taking the crown was something he did to show his humility. Also in Acts 2-3, Caesar refused to listen to the people who told him about the conspiracy to kill him. Caesar’s wife, Calphurina, had a dream that Caesar was going to be killed at the Capitol. Then, Artemidorus tried to warn him about the conspiracy as he was heading to the Capitol but still Caesar did not listen. Caesar not listening to the people (his wife and Artemidorus) that told him about the conspiracy …show more content…

Not only did Metellus Cimber beg Caesar to let Publius Cimber back into Rome but also Brutus, Caesar’s most trusted friend, also kneeled to Caesar. Caesar said “I have to stop you, Cimber. These kneelings and humble courtesies might excite ordinary men, flattering them into turning Roman law into children’s games. But don’t be so foolish as to think you can sway me from what’s right by using the tactics that persuade fools. If you kneel and beg and flatter for him, I’ll kick you out of my way like I would a dog.” Caesar speaking to the citizens of Rome in this manner shows a bit of

Show More
Related
740 Words | 3 Pages

He was also was a very bad man. He would kill all people that would disagree with him, was a terrible leader, and weak. He was a terrible leader because he was not going to go to the traditional race at the festival of Lupercal. The only reason he was not going to go is because a soothsayer told him to beware the ides of March, March fifteenth to be specific. Julius Caesar is a man that the conspirators would consider a bad man.

Read More
739 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

Yet Brutus says he was ambitious; and sure he is an honorable man. I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, but here I am to speak what I do know” (3.2.92-98). Antony presented the crown of Rome to Julius Caesar three times, but Caesar refused it all three times. Antony strongly believed Caesar would have been a good ruler and truly deserved the crown. Brutus seemed to always believe Julius Caesar wanted the crown to feel successful in life.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

Corruption is defined as dishonest or illegal behavior, especially by powerful people, and just like its definition, corruption and power go hand in hand. The more power a person has, generally, the easier it is for them to be corrupted. Just like in Julius Caesar where power and corruption are very prevalent, and most of the leaders in Julius Caesar became corrupted by their power, but in some rare cases leaders have avoided corruption, these people are very valuable in society, and must not be taken for granted. Just like many other leaders in Julius Caesar, Caesar was corrupted by his power. He wasn’t corrupt in the normal sense, he was socially corrupt in the fact that he didn’t stick to the social norms of respecting fellow senators in

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

I think that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered for the fact that he had a different view than other people. In (act II,scene 1,line 32-34) the text says “And therefore think him as a serpent’s egg which,hatched,would as his kind grow mischievous and kill him in the shell.” This text is saying that he is evil and should be killed. Conspirators should not have killed Caesar. Just because someone has different views and opinions that you don't like you can't murder them for that.

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar could also be seen as villain and had to be killed in order to keep Rome and the republic safe. He was considered a villain because he took down the republic. Even though many people disliked Caesar and his ways, many people were also fond of Caesar such as Brutus who was still apart of the conspiracy. Brutus says “I would not, Cassius, yet I love him well.” (1.2.82)

Read More
202 Words | 1 Pages

In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, a horrendous crime took place, in Act three Scene 1. Julius Caesar was killed by the conspirators. After his murder Antony, fearing for his life sympathized with the conspirators, but he became determined to prove they were criminals. The great and “honourable” Brutus and Cassius, talk to the crowd of plebeians, to announce the death of Caesar and to justify the terrible crime. Antony gave Caesar 's funeral speech, was not involved in the murder, but he declared loyalty to the murderers, but he still remained loyal to Caesar.

Read More
563 Words | 3 Pages

The 44th President, Barack Obama in his Inauguration Speech he talked about the changes that were going to be made in the United States and the current events that are going on. He explained the thing he is going to do to fix it. Obama’s purpose of this speech was to talk about how we as a country are in trouble. America as a whole is going downhill and it needs to be changed around. The audience that he is giving this speech to is the previous Presidents of the United States, the other people he is addressing this to are the people of the United States.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

The people of Rome along with the conspirators convinced him to kill his former friend, Caesar. His last words before killing Caesar were “not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (III.II.19-24) This shows that he cared more about the society and people of Rome, than his friend. It also shows how they could influence him to turn against his friend.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

(kneeling) Great Caesar. Caesar- Haven’t I resisted even Brutus, begging from his knees? Casco-Hands, speak for me! ”

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

To Kill a Mockingbird was published right as the Civil Rights Movement peaked in the 1960s. Lee 's interest in the subject of civil injustices in the south began when she was just five years old. At the time, nine black men were on trial for raping two white women. This was a highly controversial and publicized trial. In the end, the nine men were sentenced to lengthy prison time.

Read More
848 Words | 4 Pages

Antony told the people about him trying to make Caesar king. He told the plebeians that he “thrice presented him a kingly crown,/ which he thrice refused” (3.2 105-106). This was saying that Caesar did not take the crown after three times and he maybe did not want to be king. Maybe Caesar really wanted what was best for Caesars funeral. Caesar could have not been ambitious and really had some good views for Rome future.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.

Read More
463 Words | 2 Pages

Lucius Junius Brutus one of Brutus’ ancestor that turned Rome into a republic. Brutus loves caesar but doesn't want him to become king. Brutus doesn't have a personal reason to kill Caesar but for the good of Rome he has to. The country of rome would fall to Caesar if he became king because he is corrupt.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

In public, Caesar was the leader Rome had always wished for, a strong, valliant man that would let nothing in his way. Consequently, Caesar had a more vulnerable side to him where the reader would be able to see glimpses of throughout the play. Still, Caesar allowed his public self image to take priority in which would eventually lead to his death. Speaking historically, the great Julius Caesar was a people’s leader with a deep hunger for power in which he would do anything to

Read More

More about Corruption Depicted In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

Related Topics

Open Document