ipl-logo

Court Case: John Collins V Parviz Deaf

1005 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Judicial precedent

1. BRIEF INFORMATION:

Court Attended: Ringwood Magistrate Court (39 Ringwood St, Ringwood VIC 3134)
Incident Date: 30th May 2014
Incident Place: 34 Bellevue Avenue, Doncaster East Vic 3109
Case Hearing date: 19-08-2015 @ 9:30 a.m.
Parties Name: John Collins v Parviz Kamal
Magistrate: McNamara
Prosecutor: Kellie Christie
Proceeding Observed: Committal Proceeding

Court Room: 2

2. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE:
The case was a criminal matter (Neighbourhood Dispute).
Material facts of the case: Dispute between neighbours over written sentence on the car windscreen.
It was a contestant hearing. Defendant pleads not guilty. Purpose of the proceeding to resolve the matter.
The matter (Case) was a criminal matter and …show more content…

Defendant used unlawful language for Plaintiff.
3. Defendant refused to leave the residential property of Plaintiff.
Ms. John Collins (Plaintiff) & Parviz Kamal (Defendant) are neighbours. John Collins wrote some sentence on defendant friend’s car windscreen “Move your car ASAP” which was parked in front of plaintiff house. Defendant had an argument with plaintiff why she did that but instead of getting answer somehow he involved in the dispute at the level that he assault and injured plaintiff. s17 (1)(b) & s17 (2) of the Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), Act and section was breached.
The issue in dispute is mainly plaintiff was assaulted and injured by defendant.
Plaintiff had more evidence than defendant who was actually present at the incident place where it all happens.
Mr. Anthony Haward (the builder who was doing work at Plaintiff property on the day of incident)
Police constable Sarah Farmer who arrived at the incident point with her two colleges after calling on 000. She actually saw the injury Plaintiff had.
Plaintiff also gave the medical report issued by Medical centre for the injury she had during the assault.
The evidence from defendant side was not strong enough because he accepts the unlawful language used by …show more content…

He adjourned the court and came back after 15 minutes to gave decision.

6. Final result

The case starts at 10:00 a.m. in morning and run till 3:30 p.m.

The dispute issued was decided on the facts presented by Plaintiff and defendant. The charges for assaulting and refusal to leave the property was proved with evidence presented and even when police arrived at the incident spot , the defendant was present at the property.
The final order made against the defendant and he was ordered to pay a fine of $800, which includes $300 for refusal to leave the plaintiff property after requesting and $500 for assaulting her. The fine, which will payable by him, will go to charity. He was also ordered to sign a bond of good character certificate, which will be valid for 12 months. In those 12 months if anyone complaint against the defendant than there will is another hearing on 18 August 2016.
Defendant loses his case because of the lack of evidence. The evidence he presented even he accepts that he used unlawful language for the plaintiff. But he refused to accept the injury incidence he

Show More
Related
1757 Words | 8 Pages

Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More
90 Words | 1 Pages

P alleges excessive force and false arrest. P alleges that she was in her kitchen when MOS broke her front door and entered the apartment and pushed her against the wall. P alleges that MOS handcuffed her and Noel Tartlaon, Noel Tartlaon, Jr. and Farrow Wright (non-parties). Defendant MOS Jose Peinan states that MOS were executing a search warrant obtain after confidential informant bought drugs form Jumaane, (non-party). MOS Peinan states that Jumane was arrested in the lobby and narcotics were recovered from him.

Read More
184 Words | 1 Pages

Name of Case: LaChance vs. Erickson Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, and the U.S. Supreme Court Parties and their roles:. LaChance, director, Office of Personnel Management petitioner; Erickson et al Responded Relevant facts: Federal employees made false statements to agency investigators with respect to their misbehavior. The legal issue(s) raised: The legal issue raised was that the respondents, federal employees were charged by their agencies because each of them made false statements to the agency investigators with respect to their misconduct.

Read More
955 Words | 4 Pages

The appellant essential accommodation claim went to trial but court excluded evidence regarding to disability. The plaintiff’s is not estopped by her SSDI and long term disability claims. However the issue should have been decided by jury. The court foreclosed to grant the plaintiff was not a qualified individual.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

The defendant used his position of authority to allow him to lack effort in the investigation process, causing there not to be proper law carried out. At the conclusion of the case, after you have heard all of the evidence, I am confident that you will conclude that the defendant has overused the

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

1. Facts: Explain the essential facts of the case. Tell the story of the case. Jacob Winkleman is a 6-year-old student at Pleasant Valley Elementary School in Parma, Ohio. Jacob was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder and is covered under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (Act or IDEA), 84 Stat. 175, as amended, 20 U. S. C. §1400 et seq.

Read More
569 Words | 3 Pages

Issue Case name: State of Oregon vs Kenneth James Harris, October 19th, 2017 Facts of the case: In the case there were two parties, one party including the defendant, Kenneth James Harris, and the State of Oregon. The dispute is based on the state of Oregon issuing a subpoena for the witness to come to trial for the case of the defendant, however, the witness failed to do so and was unavailable. The defendant argued that the only way the witness is unavailable is if the state did everything in their power to try to get the witness to court. The only thing the state did was provide the victims recording of the 9-1-1 call from the incident. Issue: Could the State of Oregon done more to produce the witness at trial?

Read More
1209 Words | 5 Pages

This part of the system generally takes place with the defendant being delivered earlier than a decision for a proper hearing informing the defendant of the unique fees being delivered towards them. This a part of the system generally occurs within forty-eight hours of a defendant's arrest in maximum jurisdictions. all through the

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Complainant Allen advised that on the night of April 26, 2017 she had just arrived home and she saw Francheska assaulting her boyfriend outside of her apartment building. As Complainant Allen was going to her apartment, Francheska made a statement about Complainant Allen being involved with her boyfriend. Complainant Allen and Francheska excahnaged words and Complainant Allen went to her apartment. Francheska and Qyneshia followed Complainant Allen and forced their way inside of Complainant Allen’s apartment and refused to leave. Complainant Allen and Francheska continued to exchange word and finally Complainant Allen was able to get Francheska and Qyneshia to leave her apartment.

Read More
1013 Words | 5 Pages

Mr. Haselton was writing this document because the defendants were appealing the court

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

Just inside the railing that divided the spectators from the court were the witnesses sitting on ‘cowhide-bottomed chairs’. The witness stand was to the right of Judge Taylor. The Ewell’s were placed near the front. ‘

Read More
927 Words | 4 Pages

The accused had the responsibility of taking care of her. In the progress of taking care of her, the accused touched and kissed the complainant’s breast. He also forced the complainant to touch his penis which is an act of

Read More

More about Court Case: John Collins V Parviz Deaf

Related Topics

Open Document