Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american story essays
Introduction to native american literature
Native americans the story of their culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
One of the Similarities is that they both involve tricking and authoritative figure figure. Both the king and the thunder god have authority over the trickster. In both stories the tricksters get what they want from the god/king. In both "Coyote Steals Fire" and "Master Cat" the tricksters both lie and cheat to get what they want. Coyote cheats the thunder god into giving away fire, master cat tricks the king into giving away his daughter’s hand in marriage.
For example, both of these texts share the setting of a cold climate. Plus, the men in both stories have an amazing sense of direction and know where they are going without being able to see tracks from those who have come before them. Also, the boy and dog aid the men on their quests. In Powder the father treats the boy as something to protect, but in To Build a Fire the man uses the dog as an "experiment" just to make sure that he himself didn't get cold feet. Furthermore, in Powder the man and boy aid each other and their relationship grows, whereas in To Build a Fire the relationship starts out fine then as the story progresses the man uses the dog instead of caring for him.
Coyote wanted fire for everyone on earth and he got it. The second similarity is they both had
For example, there are antagonists in both of the stories. But there are many more similarities than that. Similarities In the story “Three Billy Goats Gruff” there are two different countries telling the story. One is Norway, and the other country is Poland/Germany.
In both myths, in the process of the protagonist getting the fire, at least one animal’s physical trait was changed. And, in both myths the antagonists are female. In the Coyote myth, when the coyote was running down the hill trying to get away from the Fire Beings after stealing their fire, one touched the tip of his tail and stained it white, and that is why coyotes have white end the end of their tails. Then, the coyote flung the fire away from him and the squirrel caught it. The squirrel put the fire on his back, and it burned his back so bad that his tail curled up, and that is why squirrels have curled tails to this day.
This fable is often compared to the children’s cartoon “Tom and Jerry” due to the use of violence or deceit to their benefit. Additionally, Buffalo would be the wise man because of his kind, wise, guiding personality. Buffalo, who was killed in the beginning of the fable, comes back not only to finish his enemies but to reclaim his herd. He takes a chance on Coyote and grants him and only to, again, be deceived. Not only that, he proceeds to be a profound philosopher and known for his sound
This shows that in both stories workers show up to save the birds. This confirms that both stories have a similar conflict.
One of the more obvious similarities is that both tricksters in both stories are animals. Another similarity in these stories is they both share anthropomorphism. Anthropomorphism is giving animals
One of the most important similarity is that both stories are well enjoyed over generations and teach great life lessons that serve the sole purpose of the
In both the fables “Ant and Grasshopper” and “The Richer, the Poorer” they talk about being prepared. the fables are similar and different in many ways In the first fable “Ant and Grasshopper” one of the main characters wants the other one to share but he doesn’t want to since he worked hard for it. In the other fable “The Richer, the Poorer” the two main characters are sisters where one saves money and the other one just wants to have fun. The characters in the fables have some actions and personality traits in common.
The earth is a valuable place that should be kept safe by those who live in it. Joseph Bruchac in “The Sky Tree” and Barry Lopez in “Coyote Finishes His Work” are both Native American literatures that demonstrate the importance of earth. In the “Sky Tree” a sick man asked his wife Aataentic to cut down a tree because he believed that the fruit that grew from the tree would heal him. When the tree was cut it fell through a hole; eventually, the tree grows in a new earth. In “Coyote finishes his Work” Coyote the main character teaches the Indians how to survive.
In “master cat” The main character was a cat, who talked, walked on his hind legs, wore boots and had an entire thinking process all on his own. Meanwhile in “how stories came to earth” The main character was a spider who, as well, Talked, had a wife and also had a thinking process. Both each came up with master plans to fit the hopes of success, even know both their needs were both different. Another Similarity was that they each achieved their goals in the end. Master cat had turned his master from a poor miller’s son into a prince just by tricking the king into thinking that His master was wealthy and owned a lot of land, And Anansi had tricked all the animals falling into his traps and in the end, getting the Sky god’s stories.
Native American Trickster tales are told to children of the tribes orally and have morals and lessons within the tales to help teach its listeners how to behave and right from
The Trickster hero serves as a subject onto which are projected the fears, failures, and unattained ideals of the source culture; that creates order out of chaos and teaches humans the skills of survival through negative examples that usually end with a complete failure, so these stories generally combine lessons with humor. Now, I would like to focus on the trickster Coyote, whose myths were told by the tribes of California, Plateau and Southwest areas. I have found a lot of interesting myths that related to Coyote that I would like to comment, but I will concentrate in the story I liked the
Even though both of these stories include the theme of reaching for something you don’t quite have may be in place in totally different texts that use their imagery in different ways, you can still find similar themes in both pieces of