ipl-logo

International Criminal Court Thesis Statement

709 Words3 Pages

Thesis Statement:
The International Criminal Court is an ineffective mechanism in providing justice to victims of crimes against humanity and prosecuting human rights violations to their necessary means; based on their inability for international unity, lack of funding and ratio of the court's timeline and case outcomes.
Essay Summary:
Following the genocides in Cambodia, the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda made the need for an international court that prosecutes war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity that much more critical. In 1992 the General Assembly of the United Nations instructed the International Law Commission to draft a bill for such a court and in July of 2002, the Rome Statue established the official International Criminal …show more content…

It is either voted a preliminary examination or graded a situation under investigation. Once it is accepted as a case, it is brought through a six-stage process including the pretrial, trial, appeals, reparations, closed and revision. There have been 24 cases before the Court, in some cases, there has been more than one suspect. ICC judges have issued 30 arrest warrants; from this 30, eight persons have been detained in ICC detention centers and have appeared before the Court. ICC judges have also issued 9 summonses to appear. The judges have issued 6 verdicts, 9 convictions, and 1 acquittal. There are over 800 staff members today in the Court, from approximately 100 States. Critiques of the Court:
The timeline of the International Criminal Court speaks to the volumes of the failures of the court. Despite, becoming fully run in 2002, the court didn’t open its first case until September of 2009. The ICC depends on the cooperation of the states that have ratified it to turn over suspects and help in the information gathering process to speed up and actually complete fair and efficient trials. Case

Show More
Related
978 Words | 4 Pages

Legal studies assessment 1. The name of the case is Webb v Edwards [2018] NSWDC 67 - The parties involved in this case are: - Tony Webb (Plaintiff) - Lyndon John Edwards (Defendant)

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

In a criminal case, first the jury is selected, followed by a preliminary hearing where it is decided if there is enough evidence for the case to be brought up in the court of law, then an arraignment occurs where the defendant pleads guilty, not guilty, or no contest. After this, the plea hearing begins where the defendant can make an agreement with the prosecutor to make a plea bargain, which is pleading guilty to a less serious crime and giving up the right to a speedy public trial to avoid risk conviction of greater penalty for a more serious crime, after which the trail starts. During the trial, opening statements are given, evidence is presented, examination and cross-examination of witnesses take place, followed by closing statements. Once the trial is finished the judge instructs the jury and they leave to deliberate. The jury returns with their verdict only if the decision is unanimous, if it isn’t the judge orders a mistrial where the trial is called off completely or a new jury is selected.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Introduction and Summary: Chapter 11 focuses on the individuals with mental illness and the criminal justice system. Every year there are hundreds of thousands of individuals with mental illness who are arrested. The past decade a lot of the state hospital and mental health facilities have been shut down for lack of funding. Many of the seriously mentally ill are roaming the streets. The serious mental illness regarding this chapter would include schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe depression.

Read More
1071 Words | 5 Pages

The criminal just system failed Marlina Medrano in so many ways. When Medrano contacted the police about be assaulted by Thomas Hartless and he left with a handgun, in my opinion an arrest warrant should have been put out for him due to the facts that (1) he threatened to kill her (2) it wasn’t the first time he threatened her, and (3) he left with a handgun which was a felony due to his prior felony conviction. My thoughts are the criminal justice system failed to protect Medrano as the police knew of all of this and didn’t issue a warrant until 11 days later. When Hartless went to court for this, he pleaded not guilty and was released on his own recognizance.

Read More
1014 Words | 5 Pages

First of all, the officials suspect an individual is committing a crime. The cop can follow and gather evidence against the individual suspected of committing a wrong doing. If the cop feels he/she has enough evidence, but needs more they issue a warrant signed by a judge and search the individual or their property. Arrest, which is when an

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Article 6 states that crimes against peace, such as starting or planning a war, war crimes, such as violating the customs of war, and crimes against humanity, namely extermination, enslavement, and genocide will all be judged by the International Trbiunal (“Establishing the Nuremberg Tribunal”, 2017). The second and arguably most influential article of the charter of the International Tribunal was article 9. Article 9 states that an organization, such as a company, can be declared as criminal and all members of the institution are guilty of its evil. This however was strengthened by article 12, which states that an organization member’s position does not absolve them of any guilt. This means that anyone, regardless of rank or merit, is still punishable by the International Tribunal.

Read More
1372 Words | 6 Pages

After many years of pushing aside the unlawful subject of genocide, in 1948 the UN General assembly held an international convention on the prevention, and punishment against the crime of genocide; it was finally put to work in 1951. (Doc. B) Even though we knew genocide was happening in the past with the holocaust, it took us around four decades to go through creating an international criminal tribunal until 1994. (Doc. B) The main question leaves us in document B saying, “Why did it take so long, despite atrocities and mass killings in Cambodia, East Timor, and elsewhere?”

Read More
680 Words | 3 Pages

D). In Document A “study the problem of genocide and to prepare a report on the possibilities of declaring genocide an international crime.” Although this would have been a great action to protect civilians value during the Nazi crimes, which were inhumane. However, due to the “lack of adequate provisions and previous formulation of international law, the Nuremberg Tribunal had to dismiss the Nazi crimes,” (Doc. A). The international government have not payed attention to serious issues concerning their people.

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

However, the Assembly of State Parties has a limited role since the judges settle all disputes themselves (Schaefer97). The ICC is a challenge to the authority of the Security Council. The Rome Statute, which is signed by members of the states, empowers the court to investigate, prosecute and punish any individual for undefined crimes against humanity (Schiff 43). This challenges the prerogatives and authority of the Security Council of the UN, which is chartered to maintain peace and security. It is the only institution in the UN that has power to determine when a State committed an act of

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

In the UNSC’s article 51, individual and collective self-defense can be authorized by the UNSC under the framework of collective security. However, genocide is never justifiable in the eyes of the UN. Perhaps the most distinguishing feature between war and genocide is the disproportionally ability of those involved to fight back. Within war there is a certain level of understanding that those engaging in the conflict will have an ability to engage in battle. However, historically in genocides the effected groups have had little to no ability to proportionately fight against their attackers.

Read More
737 Words | 3 Pages

INTROCUTION To translate the R2P principles to deeds will require serious commitment from all the governments who unanimously affirmed at the 2005 World Summit Outcome that “each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity” (UN world summit, 2005). To relies a credible implementation, it is necessary that Paragraphs 138 and 139 of the Outcome which goes to the real issue of operationalizing the responsibility to protect (widely referred to as “R2P” in English) is sincerely adhered to by all. This brief paper will cover current R2P debate and the complex issue of implementing the R2P pillars which are: Pillar one the protection responsibilities of the State (sect. II).

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Origin and History of the Criminal Justice System The Criminal justice system is a system that was made to control crime and make punishments to whoever break a law or rule. The beginning of the criminal justice system of the United States goes all the way back when the United States still belonged to the Great Britain. Americans were under Great Britain laws and rules and most of the laws were unfair. After the Revolutionary War and the United States became independent and they needed to create their own types of system to run their country.

Read More
607 Words | 3 Pages

Question: If you were Dr. Martin L. King, tell ways how Law Enforcement you would improve communications with the Local Community? Thesis Statement: What are three ways you would improve Law Enforcement in a Local Community? The first example of a way to improve the law enforcement is by enhanced the right of men and women the right to protest against the cruelty that police officers do to the innocent. On the website ThinkProgress.org/justice/2015/shocking-police-brutality-cases-october that I stumbled on while on the internet, it reads that During the month of October, police killed 95 people, according to the Killed By Police database.

Read More
1279 Words | 6 Pages

In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

Read More
2404 Words | 10 Pages

The question is whether a matter is essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of a state or not has to be decided by the Security Council which is controlled by the five permanent members of the United Nations. The availability of the veto power in the hands of the permanent members of the Security Council is a major obstacle in solving international problems. There is no certainty for international law. The international law has failed to maintain order and peace in the world for many

Read More

More about International Criminal Court Thesis Statement

Related Topics

Open Document