The main definition of Genocide is known as the intentional destruction of an entire human group based on national, racial, religious, or ethnic identity. There have been many genocides that never make it to the news, and many countries in a position to help have turned away. But the problem of genocide can be resolved by addressing the problem, making international laws, taking military action, and ending stereotypes. The easiest way for everyone around the world to stop or help in ending genocide is to address the problem of genocide itself and spread the word around. In document A, the article states, “the United Nations assembly have brought forth a resolution which calls upon the United Nations to study the problem of genocide…and assuring …show more content…
Also to deal with genocide by national legislation like other international crimes, and to view it by moral concepts. Document A also says, “What we have to do is to protect great values of our civilization through such accepted institutions adjusted to a formula of international law.” We already have some sort of laws against genocide, but we now have to adjust those laws into making them more important so the whole world applies to them. For example, the Nuremberg Tribunal was forced to dismiss the Nazi crimes, because of the lack of international law against genocide. In document A, the international concept said, “the Nuremberg Tribunal had to dismiss the Nazi crimes committed in the period between the advent of Nazism to power and the beginning of the war, as revolting and horrible as many of these crimes were.” After many years of pushing aside the unlawful subject of genocide, in 1948 the UN General assembly held an international convention on the prevention, and punishment against the crime of genocide; it was finally put to work in 1951. (Doc. B) Even though we knew genocide was happening in the past with the holocaust, it took us around four decades to go through creating an international criminal tribunal until 1994. (Doc. B) The main question leaves us in document B saying, “Why did it take so long, despite atrocities and mass killings in Cambodia, East Timor, and elsewhere?” The main answer to the question is if outside …show more content…
An example of stereotyping is basing people on their religion, physical appearance, how much money someone has, etc. There have been many stereotypes mostly based on religion like the Jews in the Holocaust, and physical appearances like in the Rwandan Genocide for the Tutsi and Hutus. (Doc. C) If we don't force or establish any specific groups everyone will then begin viewing each other as equal instead of someone higher or lesser. Document G displays two pictures of a man being classified into a group based on his physical appearance. The pictures try to show why someone would be interested in measuring and seeing what color their facial features are. What is shown in document G is a wonderful example of what needs to be stopped to end genocide, and not push toward the viewing of people seeing others differently based on their attributes. Another example of the classification of people is identification cards, which are shown in document H. Even though identification cards can be useful, they can be taken the wrong way and used for negative purposes in genocide. An example is in the Rwandan Genocide, sometimes the only thing the Interhamwe relied on was the definition card to separate the Hutus and the Tutsi, so it can help them know which person to kill. If no one had that card it would be difficult for them to sort out the people between the two groups, and make the Interhamwe question if