ipl-logo

Criminal Justice Chapter 3 Summary

529 Words3 Pages

Section 53 of the I.P.C in Chapter III is talking about the kind of punishment which can be delivered on the guilty parties. They are as follow:
1. Death penalty,
2. Imprisonment for life,
3. Imprisonment,
4. Forfeiture of property and
5. Fine.

The principle goals of the criminal justice framework can be classified as takes after:
• To protect the occurrence of crime.
• To punish the transgressors and the criminals.
• To rehabilitate the transgressors and the criminals.
• To repay the casualties beyond what many would consider possible.
• To keep up peace in the general public.
• To discourage the guilty parties from carrying out any criminal demonstration later on.

If there should be an occurrence of a guilty party other than a Juvenile, a Magistrate, under segment 29 of Cr.P.C., may pass a …show more content…

Here it is critical to note that under numerous classes of offenses discipline recommended is more than the above endorsed limit, in any case while passing sentence in such cases judge can't surpass as far as possible however he has a choice under S. 325 Cr.P.C. to forward denounced to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. A sentence of detainment in default, according to S.30 Cr.P.C., ought not be in abundance of force u/s 29 Cr.P.C. what's more, ought not surpass 1/fourth of the term of detainment which the justice is engaged to exact. Be that as it may, it might be notwithstanding substantive sentence of detainment for the greatest term granted by the Magistrate u/s 29. If there should arise an occurrence of conviction of a few offenses at one trial, according to S.31 Cr.P.C., the court may pass separate sentences, subject to the procurements of S.71 of the I.P.C. The total discipline and the length of the time of detainment must not surpass the utmost endorsed by S.71 I.P.C. S. 71 I.P.C. gives (1) that where an offense is comprised of parts each of which parts is itself an offense the guilty party can be rebuffed just for one of such offenses. (2) That where

Show More
Related
492 Words | 2 Pages

In the case of S.K vs Constable Garrett Styles, I would sentence S.K to the same punishment that his now facing. Not only banished to the solitude of his house S.K, is serving a much harsher sentence than most within the public think. The judge, justice Sonsa said to reporters that the defendant, S.K is "already serving a life sentence, imprisoned in his wheelchair.". This statement although true did not please the styles family by any means. The passed father of two young children Garrett was killed while doing a routine check.

Read More
405 Words | 2 Pages

The last chapter starts with the criminal Wes. The beginning of the chapter is a story about how Wes, Tony and other two men committed a crime. Wes’ mother Mary was shocked, when she heard the news about jewelry store robbery by four masked men; at that moment she even did not know how much this news would change her life. One of the robbers shot a veteran of police department, because of this police officers were incredibly interested to catch them. A break in the case came really quickly, because one of the perpetrators, who was Wes’ brother, tried to sell one of the stolen watches to a drug dealer who had an authorized wiretap on his phone.

Read More
491 Words | 2 Pages

Judge Sweet made decision about punishment of Lumumba for criminal contempt. He refused to review the conviction itself and sentenced Lumumba to three years’ probation without any consideration of Lumumba’s arguments. ISSUE: Had Lumumba a notice and an opportunity to

Read More
453 Words | 2 Pages

In discusiion of chapter 19, I learned that there is a high rate of incarcerated offenders in the justice system. Some offenders are released early and placed on parole. The caseloads of officers are overloaded. The average parolee have fines that they can not pay due to poor resources in the community. Many are released early because the prisons are overcrowded and punishments are used to deter crime.

Read More
1804 Words | 8 Pages

It has been discussing the provisions which brought plea bargaining. In 1970, the constitutional validity was upheld for the first timein Brady v United States, where it was held not unconstitutuonal to the extend of benefit to an accuded that in turn extends a benefit to state. In order to reduce the delay in disposing criminal matters, the 154th Report of Law Commission for the first time introduced the concept of ‘Plea-Bargaining’as far as our country is concerned, its has got a long history of opposing the introduction of plea bargaining, it was considered illegal, unconstitutional and immoral as far as the criminal trials are concerned, but the legality of this procedure for the first time was realized in the case- State of Gujrat v. Natwar Hachandji

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

Designed broadly speaking to pick up the slack of probation departments and correctional centers, intermediate sanctions can be described as criminal sentences that fall between ordinary probation and incarceration. The sentences can encompass residence arrest, boot camps, intense supervision, except different way. To be placed into immediately sanction approach that equipment are in region for an wrongdoer to be re-programmed. To provide them coping abilties for such things as coping with their intellectual infection or to provide the perpetrator's knowledge as to why they want to end inflicting ache to others in society and why the ones actions are wrong. Intermediate sanctions suggest’s to provide the offender returned values that he or

Read More
1490 Words | 6 Pages

In chapter 4 of Criminal Law Today, the author demonstrates the elements of attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation. This chapter also identifies the various tests there are used to determine if there has been adequate action to be considered a crime of attempt. This chapter also explains why courts won’t and can’t punish a person for their evil thoughts. Back in 2014, a New York City police officer, was convicted in federal court of conspiracy to commit kidnapping. However this was one of the cases that didn’t have that much evidence against the offender.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

The warrants or relief should be based upon heavily on the defendant’s interaction in the crime whether he or she was heavily invaded, accessory, prior criminal statues, and the height of the situation. Many alternatives of punishment could be presented to the defendant limit the sentencing time, set probation at an ultimate high the community service hours increased. Although those are alternatives but there need to be a fair play and justice as Fisher

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

This trend and tyranny are discussed in detail and examined in depth in the coming parts. II. A glimpse of history, international principles and practices The concept of compensating victims for the loss they suffered and to restore them by making monetary amends is justified and encouraged because of the “benefit to the victims, possible deterrent effect on the offender or on the public, the possible educative or preventive effect on public morality, the possible reformative effect on offender of ill-gotten gains and the view that compensation has an ‘intrinsic moral value of its own’.”

Read More
1460 Words | 6 Pages

Other than this, the NDPS Act also imposes severe restrictions on the grant of bail. Section 37 makes specific non-bailable unless the Court prima facie is satisfied that the accused is not guilty and such offences include those offences which involve commercial quantity of NDPS. These restrictions were also being applied to drug users upon arrest on the ground of consumption alone or simple possession of small amounts of drugs. The Courts have now clarified that persons accused of small quantity drug offences are entitled to be released on

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

Origin and History of the Criminal Justice System The Criminal justice system is a system that was made to control crime and make punishments to whoever break a law or rule. The beginning of the criminal justice system of the United States goes all the way back when the United States still belonged to the Great Britain. Americans were under Great Britain laws and rules and most of the laws were unfair. After the Revolutionary War and the United States became independent and they needed to create their own types of system to run their country.

Read More
1377 Words | 6 Pages

When critically analysed, the system derives its justification from the consistency but not the uniformity in sentencing. Key among them is the circumstances leading the offender in the crime. The magistrate therefore looks at the factors that differentiate men and women before reaching at any sentence. However, it is important to exercise fairness and where the magistrate feels weighed down by the accused person’s (women) primary responsibilities to involve child welfare services before issuing a

Read More
721 Words | 3 Pages

In the criminal justice system, the corrections component is also responsible for the rehabilitation of the convicted individual. It is their duty to attempt to make the defendant a productive member of society once again. Based on the individual’s behavior while incarcerated, the court and corrections officials may decide to place them on parole, which ensures that the individual will comply with the rules of society once they are fully released from the system. The criminal justice system is an essential role in the organizational structure of not only the United States but also in countries around the world. If there were no criminal justice system to administer punishment, the world would be unstructured, disorganized, unjustified, cruel, and not to mention a chaotic place for it citizens.

Read More
1748 Words | 7 Pages

There are various types of offences but some are against the law, and also there are judiciary interpretation to each crime. The law specifically provides for the punishment of each consequence so that offence of someone who committed murder will not be the same with someone who committed assault, for an example in civil the consequences may be giving partial warning to who is at fault in dispute conflict or permanent injunction. In criminal aspect the requirement is that prosecution must proof beyond a reasonable doubt, and Article 6(2) of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides: “Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. If intention of the accused has be proved by court and the accused is guilty the consequence of the action may be punishment which to inflict some kind of loss on the offender and give formal public expression to the unacceptability of the behaviours to the community. Secondly the Incapacitation to restrain the offender so that he or she can have limit opportunities to commit further crime.

Read More
1401 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, the need of a retributive action can even reflect the opinion that punishment for heinous crimes has value in itself, this means that there is a fundamental value in prosecuting those guilty for gross atrocities. According to this point, punishment is not requested to serve any specific practical purpose. Another explanation is that retribution is justified by its own utility, in the sense that punishing the criminals is a useful way to achieve the international criminal regime’s goals, such as reconciliation, individuation of guilt, historical documentation and deterrence (Woods, 2012). However, retribution is based on the

Read More

More about Criminal Justice Chapter 3 Summary

Related Topics

Open Document