ipl-logo

Criminal Trial Process Analysis

563 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Criminal trial process 3 p4

The process of a criminal trial is a multifaceted occurrence that has the potential to follow a variety of routes. A courtroom observed in Camrose on October 14, 2015 modelled the procedure of a criminal trial precisely. Criminal trials occur after the following conditions are met: a crime is committed, the police intervene and take the necessary action required to prevent further offenses, and the offender has been issued a summons to court. At this point, lawyers may attempt to convince the offender to accept a plea bargain. A plea bargain urges the miscreant to plead guilty in order to save money and time, to spare a victim from testifying, and to help the offender assume responsibility. The essential personages in a criminal trial are the crown prosecutor, the defense attorney, and the judge. The role of the crown prosecutor is to present the evidence, including all previous offences, of the case and to attempt to prove the offender’s guilt. The predominant task of the defence attorney is to represent the offender and attempt to either prove the offender innocent, or earn the criminal the least harsh punishment available. The judge has the responsibility of accepting all evidence and listening to the entirety of the case in order to achieve a fair verdict for the …show more content…

In addition to this, the judge’s determine the sentence for the criminal. Should a jury be unable to conclude unanimously, the judge will assign the offender a new trial that may or may not be presented to a jury. the offender then has the option to accept this sentence or appeal their case to a higher court (ie Supreme Court of Canada), in this case

Show More
Related

Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case

852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

652 Words | 3 Pages

Both sides will carefully weigh the strength of their case and decide whether it is prudent to go to trial. The prosecution may also consider the publicity surrounding the case and whether there is public pressure to prosecute that particular defendant to the full extent of the law. The defense will consider the individual defendant’s desire to go to trial and the seriousness of the potential sentence. The Pros of Plea Bargaining

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Juries In Australia

1543 Words | 7 Pages

The relevance of juries in the Australian criminal system given the expansion in modern technology has been questioned regarding the effectiveness of ordinary people judging complex legal issues. The jury system was developed in England between the 12th and 15th century, in a time when courts relied more on the theory of a jury judging its own peers. With complex evidence presented in courts and the advances in technology available to the average citizen, the use of the jury system has been reported to have problems regarding the comprehension and impartiality. There are many pros and cons to the jury system currently in use in our Australian legal system, for the jury system to be able to work coherently with our legal system these pros and

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Australia's Adversary System

613 Words | 3 Pages

Australian courts have ruled that a trial will rarely be fair for an accused without adequate legal representation and due to this give parties to gather and present evidence and make the decision of having legal representation. Although legal representation is an option, in most cases it costs a significant amount of money and many people cannot afford such large costs. Since the adversary system is flexible and allows for parties to have control, alternatives are taken into consideration of these issues. This is shown in the case R v Gittany 2014 as Simon Gittany granted a judge-alone trial in order to save money on legal representation. By choosing this option of a judge alone trail he the case became case two weeks shorter, saving time.

Read More

Arraignment: Court Case Study

210 Words | 1 Pages

First step is the initial appearance which will happen within 24 hours of your arrest. Here the defendant is brought to court and informed of their constitutional rights. They are asked if they can afford counsel. The judge informs the defendant of the charges against him. Next step is bail.

Read More

The Death Penalty: Furman V. Georgia

824 Words | 4 Pages

A bifurcated trial system was set up which consists of two phases, for bifurcated means divided. It is decided separately if the person on trial is guilty and what the penalty placed on the individual is (Vile). Each phase is subject can be to appeal too. In the first phase or the guilt phase, both sides submit evidence and argue whether or not the individual is guilty or not. In Gregg’s case, he had signed a waiver admitting to the killings and it was evident that he was guilty(“Gregg v. Georgia (1976)”).

Read More

Does Plea Bargaining Affects The Criminal Justice System

331 Words | 2 Pages

• The Constitution is weakened by the excessive use of plea-bargaining to avoid a trial. Research has shown that criminal defendants who exercise their Sixth Amendment right to trail by jury are more severely punished than those who accept plea bargains (Devers, 2011, p. 2). It is assumed that plea-bargaining weakens the criminal justice system by allowing violent criminals to plea out of serious charges and putting the disadvantaged and potentially innocent or partially innocent in a position where exercising their constitutional right to a trial by jury is too risky of an option. Prosecutors are required by the state to carry the burden and prosecute the accused.

Read More

Criminal Decision-Making

675 Words | 3 Pages

The offender decides whether or not the choice will be beneficial. Even though everything cannot be possibly thought out and planned by an offender perfectly but they can rely on the course things taking place at the time of the

Read More

Evidence That Defendant Is Guilty

851 Words | 4 Pages

1. The role of the criminal prosecutor is to prove that that defendant is truly guilty. It is there job to look at all the evidence that is available and use that evidence to show why it is true that that person committed the crime so that they are prosecuted the way that they need to be. The job of the criminal defense attorney is to look at all the evidence that the prosecutor is bringing forth and to show why that evidence is not reliable or does not have any proof that it is linked to the person being accused of the crimes. It is their job to try to keep the accused person from being sentenced.

Read More

Jury Trial System Analysis

1946 Words | 8 Pages

I. Introduction Many experiences can come from walking on foreign land. We can learn the language, enjoy the cuisine, take in the culture, etc.., but how can one get a sense for a country 's government or legal system at ground zero? Although my sense for Mexico’s government is in hindsight, today I’m able to draw a line between the dots that represent my experiences and the once reality of political life in Los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. I have fond memories of my early teens which included going on family trips to my grandfather 's ranch in Puerto Pensaco, a city at the northeastern part of the state of Sonora. I can remember

Read More

The Judge Movie Analysis

689 Words | 3 Pages

In this paper, the movie “The Judge” is going to be discussed to view the criminal case that is presented. The case that is being represented in the movie is The State of Indiana v. Joseph Palmer of murder in the first degree. The fact that is known is that the victim, mark Blackwell, was struck by a vehicle while riding his bike at night from a convenience store during a rain storm. The issues that arise from the case that is mentioned is trying to put the accused at the scene of the crime because moments before the alleged crime, the victim and the accused were seen having a brief conversation at a local convenience store. By analyzing the case from a criminological perspective, I will be able to determine if the facts and issues that are

Read More

Ethics In The Criminal Justice System

1279 Words | 6 Pages

In the formal criminal justice process, there are important decision makers that decide whether to keep the offender in the system or dismiss the suspect with no future consequences. Suppose a law was set in place

Read More

International Criminal Court (ICC): The International Legal System

1785 Words | 8 Pages

Firstly, the Pre-Trial division has the authority to settle all issues that come forth before the trial phase begins. The Pre-Trial also supervises how the Office of the Prosecutor carries out the investigation making sure the rights of the suspects, victims and witnesses are not deprived while investigations are taking place. The Pre-Trial division then makes the decision to issue a warrant of arrest, summons and decided whether to confirm the charges against the suspected criminal. In addition to that, the Trial Division then carries out the trial determining if the accused is guilty or not. If seen as guilty they then have the responsibility to impose a sentence that must not exceed thirty years or life imprisonment.

Read More

Importance Of Law In To Kill A Mockingbird

693 Words | 3 Pages

The lawyer, the sheriff as well as the jurors are all contributors within a criminal justice system with a responsibility to the truth, but who choose to ignore it in order to achieve what they consider the ‘right‘ result, based on their personal morality. I firmly believe that morality should be enshrined in the law and employed impartially to all, through public mechanisms such as trials, not privately or subject to the whims of

Read More

Trial By Jury Advantages And Disadvantages

1472 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will briefly discuss the role of the jury and how it works, from the principle behind it, to the method with which members are selected, and to the powers available to jurors. Moreover, it will outline advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury, and it will point out a couple of ways which could ameliorate this type of trial. Trial by jury has been a part of the criminal justice system since the 12th century (Davies, 2015), it is considered an ancient right and a symbol of liberty (Hostettler, 2004). It creates no precedent and it can decide challenging cases equitably without making bad law, it also brings members of the public into the administration of justice and into an understanding of legal and human rights (Hostettler,

Read More

More about Criminal Trial Process Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document