ipl-logo

Criticisms Of Theistic Argumentative Essay

903 Words4 Pages

There is much information about the various religions and philosophies of the world as concerning their god, or many gods; there is just as much viable information concerning the theistic belief. The theistic person undeniably believes in the existence of just one true God. To believe in this only God, also qualifies Him to be the Creator and Sustainer of the world. The statement made in Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created…” is not a statement that is up for debate. There is “nothing added to gratify the curious. The opening sentence of Holy Writ is not to be philosophized about, but is presented as a statement of truth to be received with unquestioning faith.”
There are many valid criticisms against the theistic argument that seek to …show more content…

If God does exist, then perhaps He truly is the creator of all. “The existence of natural objects shows that they must have a Maker, for there can be no effect without a sufficient cause.”
The next criticism of a theistic belief is that “A Posteriori” argument is also logically invalid. In other words, the knowledge that one has gained about God from observations or experiences is not admissible to prove that God exists. “The existence of God cannot be proven without appealing to some principle that is truly independent of experience. But to import an a priori principle is to open the argument to two criticisms. First, no a priori based argument is valid; there are no rationally inescapable arguments about reality, as was just shown. Second, even if one combines a posteriori experience and some a priori based principle, there is still the problem of the justification of that principle.” The text uses a logical ten step process to prove the existence of man and therefore prove the existence of the one true God. We will not look at each step in the process but only the last few. After several steps of causes, one can deduct that this infinitely perfect being is appropriately called God. In other words, the infinite being who created the universe is not unknown but indeed has a name. To call Him God is to acknowledge His position and power and to place a great value on Him as Lord and

Show More
Related

H. J Mccloskey Response Paper

2566 Words | 11 Pages

Response Paper: In the article “On Being an Atheist” by H.J McCloskey, the author presented his argument that many atheist and theist have debated over years and he argued the existence of God from the view of an atheist. The thoughts that McCloskey debated in his article were very interesting but did not show validity in the points that were made and he did not completely bring out the points of the argument of there being no God. In the article, McCloskey argued against three different theistic proofs from an atheist perspective, and the three theistic arguments are cosmological, theological, the argument about design. In McCloskey article, he presents the arguments of God and renames them “proofs”, concluding that this is not enough evidence

Read More

Using The Fine-Tuning Argument Analysis

1173 Words | 5 Pages

God can be best defined as, “the unique, independently existing, omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect creator of the universe” (Cray 04/12/2017). The difference between theists and atheists is that theists believe in the existence of God, whereas atheists believe in the absence of God. Focusing on the arguments presented by philosophers Robin Collins and William Rowe, and their responses to the ideas of theism and atheism, we can further analyze the evidence to support or negate the existence of a higher power. Collins opens his argument observing that life would have been impossible if certain laws of nature and physical constants had been slightly altered. He then goes on to compare the universe to a biosphere that is made up of the

Read More

The Teleolgical Argument Analysis

1017 Words | 5 Pages

When discussing the philosophy of God’s plausible existence, several well composed arguments are presented, from Anselm’s Ontological Argument based the definition of God, to the Teleolgical argument grounded in the idea that a complex creation demands an intelligent creator; additionally, many debate that there is no need for a rational explanation as we are required in the nature of belief to take ‘leap of a faith’ regarding the existence of God.   While each side offers valuable insight into this dilemma, I would argue that neither fully proves the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good God.    However, as I will discuss in the rest of the paper, the Teleolgical Argument and Kierkengaard’s faith eliminates dread argument when combined can reasonably provide evidence for the existence of God.            

Read More

Mccloskey: The Proof For The Existence Of God

1757 Words | 8 Pages

(p. 70) There are a plethora of counterarguments that attempt to discredit the theistic view; for this analysis, we will briefly discuss three of them. First, the opposition may claim that the universe has always existed. The non-temporal cosmological argument is not oscillated by such claims because, as discussed previously, it does not depend on the earth’s age, only its constituents and their origins. The second, and perhaps most famous, rebuttal used by those attempting to disprove God’s existence concerns His origin.

Read More

Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God

2678 Words | 11 Pages

Though he offers many objections to the arguments made by theists, he continually returns to the claim that the evil in the world makes it plain that there is no god. While he makes a convincing case and presents a systematic

Read More

Thomas Aquinas's Five Arguments For The Existence Of God

599 Words | 3 Pages

St. Thomas Aquinas wrote five arguments for the existence of God, part of his Summa Theologiae. Thomas’ second argument for the existence of God is one of the most compelling, as we can see examples from both the Bible and nature to support it. In the cause and effect argument, Thomas starts off with providing reason that all things that exist in the world must have an original cause to all the effects we see on earth. Thomas states, “There is no case known in which a thing is found to be the efficient cause of itself” (Summa Theologiae I 2:3).Thomas is proving that nothing in nature exists without having a cause, and therefore it is impossible for something to exist in nature without something, the effect, prior to it causing it to exist. The bird, the effect, that flies around your backyard was created by two prior birds, the cause, before that one, and you can keep tracing the cause of each bird back far enough when

Read More

Thomas Aquinas First Cause Argument Analysis

1797 Words | 8 Pages

In this essay, I will set out to prove that Thomas Aquinas’ First Cause Argument does not show that God exists and the conclusion that God exists does not follow from the premises of the first cause argument. I do think that the conclusion is valid and could be sound/or has the potential to be, but the premises fail to provide the basis upon which to reach such a conclusion. Hence, I will be raising some objections to the premises and will try to disprove any counter-arguments that could be raised in its defense. This would be done by examining Aquinas’ First Cause Argument and trying to disprove it whilst countering arguments in its defense.

Read More

St. Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

661 Words | 3 Pages

St. Thomas Aquinas is the author of a piece called the The Five Ways which discusses five ways to prove the existence of God. Aquinas’ second way to prove the existence of God is through the concept of efficient causation, the belief of an object that brings a thing into being or initiates a change. In this paper, I will argue that Aquinas’ argument for efficient causation is consistent; however, his belief that there is one first cause, God, is not entirely supported. Aquinas begins his argument by proposing that everything that is known to exist has been caused to exist.

Read More

Copleston's Metaphysical Argument Analysis

901 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay, I will examine the debate between Russell and Copleston as they discuss the ‘Metaphysical Argument’ for the existence of God. Taking into consideration both sides of the argument, I will defend Copleston’s philosophical views as being right. I will first explain Copleston’s position through the Principle of Sufficient Reason and then provide the reasons why I agree with them. In the debate, Copleston takes a stance in favor of the existence of a biblical God using the Cosmological Argument as his proof.

Read More

Evaluate Anselm's Ontological Argument

539 Words | 3 Pages

2001 p. 180). To fully understand Anselm’s argument, a series of steps needs to be understood. The first step towards understanding Anselm’s argument is that one must first accept the fact that God is the greatest possible being. The second fact or point to note is that God exists in the human mind or understanding. The third point, step, or fact to accept is that if God exists only in the human mind, then God is not the greatest possible being (McGrath & OverDrive, Inc. 2001

Read More

The Cosmological Argument For The Rationality Of Believing In God

627 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God.

Read More

Thomas Aquinas Argument For The Existence Of God

1176 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Aquinas argued that God does exist, and there is evidence to assist in proving his theory on the matter. Thomas Aquinas had many reasonings in believing in a higher power, such as a God, and two of those reason are the argument from motion and the argument from design. In Thomas Aquinas’ belief and idea he discusses an argument he refers to as the argument of motion. In the argument of motion he discusses, how our senses prove that some things always have the potential for motion.

Read More

Summary Of The Problem Of Evil By J. L. Mackie

1356 Words | 6 Pages

Be that as it may, the scholar can, in the event that he wishes, acknowledge this feedback. He can concede that no discerning confirmation of God 's presence is conceivable. Also, he can in any case hold all that is key to his position, by holding that God 's presence is known in some other, non-judicious way. I think, notwithstanding, that an all the more telling feedback can be made by method for the convention issue of shrewdness. Here it can be appeared, not that religious convictions need discerning backing, but rather that they are emphatically unreasonable, that the few sections of the crucial philosophical convention are conflicting with each other, so that the scholar can keep up his position in general just by a significantly more amazing dismissal of reason than in the previous case.

Read More

Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument

1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More

An Argument For God's Existence

1696 Words | 7 Pages

When answering the charge of the atheist, there is no God, the theist is inclined to answer this charge with passion, to prove God does in fact exist. The first and best proof is found in the inerrant word of God Himself, however, for the atheist there is no such inerrancy of the scriptures. The theist must use reason when presenting arguments to the atheist, to intrigue him to seek knowledge and understanding beyond the natural world, to provide answers to questions of why and how this universe came to be. The arguments for God’s existence are arguments which should be used in tandem to give a best explanation of the existence of God, the omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect creator of the whole of the universe, whose existence is logically

Read More

More about Criticisms Of Theistic Argumentative Essay

Related Topics

Open Document