ipl-logo

Criticisms Of Theistic Argumentative Essay

903 Words4 Pages

There is much information about the various religions and philosophies of the world as concerning their god, or many gods; there is just as much viable information concerning the theistic belief. The theistic person undeniably believes in the existence of just one true God. To believe in this only God, also qualifies Him to be the Creator and Sustainer of the world. The statement made in Genesis 1:1 “In the beginning God created…” is not a statement that is up for debate. There is “nothing added to gratify the curious. The opening sentence of Holy Writ is not to be philosophized about, but is presented as a statement of truth to be received with unquestioning faith.”
There are many valid criticisms against the theistic argument that seek to …show more content…

If God does exist, then perhaps He truly is the creator of all. “The existence of natural objects shows that they must have a Maker, for there can be no effect without a sufficient cause.”
The next criticism of a theistic belief is that “A Posteriori” argument is also logically invalid. In other words, the knowledge that one has gained about God from observations or experiences is not admissible to prove that God exists. “The existence of God cannot be proven without appealing to some principle that is truly independent of experience. But to import an a priori principle is to open the argument to two criticisms. First, no a priori based argument is valid; there are no rationally inescapable arguments about reality, as was just shown. Second, even if one combines a posteriori experience and some a priori based principle, there is still the problem of the justification of that principle.” The text uses a logical ten step process to prove the existence of man and therefore prove the existence of the one true God. We will not look at each step in the process but only the last few. After several steps of causes, one can deduct that this infinitely perfect being is appropriately called God. In other words, the infinite being who created the universe is not unknown but indeed has a name. To call Him God is to acknowledge His position and power and to place a great value on Him as Lord and

Show More
Related
2566 Words | 11 Pages

Response Paper: In the article “On Being an Atheist” by H.J McCloskey, the author presented his argument that many atheist and theist have debated over years and he argued the existence of God from the view of an atheist. The thoughts that McCloskey debated in his article were very interesting but did not show validity in the points that were made and he did not completely bring out the points of the argument of there being no God. In the article, McCloskey argued against three different theistic proofs from an atheist perspective, and the three theistic arguments are cosmological, theological, the argument about design. In McCloskey article, he presents the arguments of God and renames them “proofs”, concluding that this is not enough evidence

Read More
1173 Words | 5 Pages

God can be best defined as, “the unique, independently existing, omnipotent, omniscient, morally perfect creator of the universe” (Cray 04/12/2017). The difference between theists and atheists is that theists believe in the existence of God, whereas atheists believe in the absence of God. Focusing on the arguments presented by philosophers Robin Collins and William Rowe, and their responses to the ideas of theism and atheism, we can further analyze the evidence to support or negate the existence of a higher power. Collins opens his argument observing that life would have been impossible if certain laws of nature and physical constants had been slightly altered. He then goes on to compare the universe to a biosphere that is made up of the

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

When discussing the philosophy of God’s plausible existence, several well composed arguments are presented, from Anselm’s Ontological Argument based the definition of God, to the Teleolgical argument grounded in the idea that a complex creation demands an intelligent creator; additionally, many debate that there is no need for a rational explanation as we are required in the nature of belief to take ‘leap of a faith’ regarding the existence of God.   While each side offers valuable insight into this dilemma, I would argue that neither fully proves the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good God.    However, as I will discuss in the rest of the paper, the Teleolgical Argument and Kierkengaard’s faith eliminates dread argument when combined can reasonably provide evidence for the existence of God.            

Read More
1757 Words | 8 Pages

Many non-theists contend that if theists’ demand causation for every being, then God Himself must confirm to this

Read More
2678 Words | 11 Pages

That uncaused cause must be a necessary being or beings. This understanding lays the first basic step for the theist’s worldview which claims God is that necessary being. There are many objections to this argument for the existence of God but ultimately they are irrelevant considering the minimalistic approach of the cosmological argument. McCloskey also says that this argument does not lead us to the conclusion that the uncaused cause is an all-powerful and completely perfect being. This is true.

Read More
1797 Words | 8 Pages

So the first cause argument proves that God does not exist assuming the first cause argument is sound then there must be some other cause because it is not God. In summary the notion of omnipotent is a miss-name because it implies the potency, power, causality when in fact all that it does is imply logical entailment, it implies that if it wills something you can deduce from the statement that something exists, you do not need a causal step, it is a logical deduction and therefore the first cause argument argues from causes in the world

Read More
901 Words | 4 Pages

In this essay, I will examine the debate between Russell and Copleston as they discuss the ‘Metaphysical Argument’ for the existence of God. Taking into consideration both sides of the argument, I will defend Copleston’s philosophical views as being right. I will first explain Copleston’s position through the Principle of Sufficient Reason and then provide the reasons why I agree with them. In the debate, Copleston takes a stance in favor of the existence of a biblical God using the Cosmological Argument as his proof.

Read More
539 Words | 3 Pages

2001 p. 180). To fully understand Anselm’s argument, a series of steps needs to be understood. The first step towards understanding Anselm’s argument is that one must first accept the fact that God is the greatest possible being. The second fact or point to note is that God exists in the human mind or understanding. The third point, step, or fact to accept is that if God exists only in the human mind, then God is not the greatest possible being (McGrath & OverDrive, Inc. 2001

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God.

Read More
1356 Words | 6 Pages

Be that as it may, the scholar can, in the event that he wishes, acknowledge this feedback. He can concede that no discerning confirmation of God 's presence is conceivable. Also, he can in any case hold all that is key to his position, by holding that God 's presence is known in some other, non-judicious way. I think, notwithstanding, that an all the more telling feedback can be made by method for the convention issue of shrewdness. Here it can be appeared, not that religious convictions need discerning backing, but rather that they are emphatically unreasonable, that the few sections of the crucial philosophical convention are conflicting with each other, so that the scholar can keep up his position in general just by a significantly more amazing dismissal of reason than in the previous case.

Read More
1176 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Aquinas argued that God does exist, and there is evidence to assist in proving his theory on the matter. Thomas Aquinas had many reasonings in believing in a higher power, such as a God, and two of those reason are the argument from motion and the argument from design. In Thomas Aquinas’ belief and idea he discusses an argument he refers to as the argument of motion. In the argument of motion he discusses, how our senses prove that some things always have the potential for motion.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
1348 Words | 6 Pages

For several decades, there has been a debate over whether companies and markets should be allowed to target children, with several claims being made that it is an example of sanctioned brainwashing in children. I will not refute these claims; however, I do believe that these tactics have their advantages. I believe that in our youth, our minds are more susceptible to being molded, and that society plays as much of a role in this task as our guardians do. Children often reject much of the stimulus they receive from school because it is too rigid; however, advertising is one way that society is able direct children without making the child feel like it is being controlled. Companies should advertise to children because children are more susceptible to marketing schemes, children have a no risk, yet high reward incentive to spend money, and finally, it is important for companies to be aware of the desires of their prospective adult consumer audiences.

Read More
1178 Words | 5 Pages

The claim of God being one means that God is independent of any other being. He lacks nothing and does not require anything else to help or to complete himself. The act of being One is a Claim to supremacy, as the only entity responsible for all other existence. In the sense that he is a simple composite of himself only and not made of anything more. He first must exist so His earlier argument for whether god has existence trumps the doubt of God’s existence.

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

In this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.

Read More

More about Criticisms Of Theistic Argumentative Essay

Related Topics

Open Document