ipl-logo

The Cosmological Argument For The Rationality Of Believing In God

627 Words3 Pages

Throughout human history, there has been serious philosophical and religious discussion about the rationality of believing in God. Some argue that faith in God is foolish since there is no empirical support for it, while others support the rationality of belief based on moral sense, life experience, and difficulty of the universe. It is essential to take into consideration many viewpoints and arguments when thinking about this issue. Philosophical arguments, such as the cosmological argument, which holds that the existence of the universe generally suggests an eternal cause, can be used to justify the rationality of believing in God. Known as a god of God. Additionally, the teleological argument argues that the universe's challenging structure and design indicates the existence of an intelligent designer, which offers a logical reason for considering God to be the creator. Furthermore, a lot of people turn to their religious beliefs for comfort and a sense of direction in life, which is itself evidence for the rationality of believing in God. …show more content…

Some people have come to the conclusion that faith in God is inconsistent with reason because of the scientific method, which places an emphasis on direct evidence and testable ideas. Moreover, the existence of sin creates a serious obstacle to the reasoning of belief in God. However, many often cite the lack of proof to challenge the concept of a divine being. Some people have come to the conclusion that faith in God is unbreakable because of the scientific method, which places a focus on evidence and testable ideas. Likewise, the rationality of the belief in an all-powerful and good God is seriously challenged by the problem of evil. Some people doubt the logic of faith because they perceive a conflict between the concept of a loving, all-powerful God and the reality of injustice and suffering in the

Show More
Related
1347 Words | 6 Pages

In Lara Buchak’s essay, Can It Be Rational to Have Faith? , she asserts that everyday faith statements and religious faith statements share the same attributes. She later states that in order to truly have faith, a person ceases to search for more evidence for their claim, and that having faith can be rational. Although she makes compelling arguments in favor of faith in God, this essay is more hearsay and assumption than actual fact. In this paper, you will see that looking for further evidence would constitute not having faith, but that having faith, at least in the religious sense, is irrational.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

For this disputation, I had the pleasure of arguing against the topic of be it resolved that you can convince a non-believer to affirm the existence of God using philosophical arguments. As the opposing side, Sarah and I counter argued the following: the argument from motion, the ontological argument, Pascal’s Wager, the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the moral argument. The argument from motion argues that it is only possible to experience that which exists, and people experience God, therefore God must exist; however it can be counter argued that since faith cannot be demonstrated or experienced, as it is unseen, God cannot exist.

Read More
1897 Words | 8 Pages

IV. The Problem of Evil So far, we have examined only arguments for the existence of God. But for each argument, we have also discussed some objections. Some theists may accept all these objections and yet maintain a belief in the existence of God.

Read More
304 Words | 2 Pages

Philosopher Saint Thomas Aquinas attempted to justify god’s existence through the study of the cosmos. With this argument, Aquinas borrowed many ideas from the philosopher Aristotle, which actually influenced some of his key parts. Aquinas offers five proofs to god existence in two of his works. Two out of the five are used in the cosmological argument for god’s existence. This cosmological argument is based on the observation of the physical world, which includes the cosmos.

Read More
1017 Words | 5 Pages

When discussing the philosophy of God’s plausible existence, several well composed arguments are presented, from Anselm’s Ontological Argument based the definition of God, to the Teleolgical argument grounded in the idea that a complex creation demands an intelligent creator; additionally, many debate that there is no need for a rational explanation as we are required in the nature of belief to take ‘leap of a faith’ regarding the existence of God.   While each side offers valuable insight into this dilemma, I would argue that neither fully proves the existence of an all-knowing, all-powerful and all-good God.    However, as I will discuss in the rest of the paper, the Teleolgical Argument and Kierkengaard’s faith eliminates dread argument when combined can reasonably provide evidence for the existence of God.            

Read More
1757 Words | 8 Pages

One of the many inquiries that have been pondered throughout time has been the question of God’s existence. McCloskey was an atheistic philosopher that denied the existence of God and gave certain “proofs” to verify his absence. Two of the main arguments that theistic philosophers use are the cosmological and the theological arguments. McCloskey takes these arguments and uses his “proofs” against them to disprove God. Although the cosmological and the theological argument do not prove that God is an absolute being, these arguments use certain reasons and evidence to support and build a claim that God does exist.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

This is true because no observations and experiments can be done to find an answer to God’s existence. Furthermore, people that have a strong faith will not long for scientific answers in order to have believe in God. I cannot disagree with any of the arguments Lewis provides because they all acknowledge the existence of God and do not question God’s existence.

Read More
2678 Words | 11 Pages

Though he offers many objections to the arguments made by theists, he continually returns to the claim that the evil in the world makes it plain that there is no god. While he makes a convincing case and presents a systematic

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

(Gregg Allison, p. 270). Hence, the conflict doesn't seem to arise from serious reasons and isn't actually as polarized and contradictory as it appears to be. Francis Collins provides a surprising fact about the number of scientists that do believe in the existence of God as a necessity: "About 40 percent answered in the affirmative. In 1997, the same survey was repeated verbatim—and to the surprise of the researchers, the percentage remained very nearly the same." (Francis Collins, p.

Read More
1934 Words | 8 Pages

The idea of a single, benevolent, perfect, and all-powerful creator is itself powerful, and has been a driving factor behind many people’s actions, and great acts of kindness and brutality have been made in the name of such a being over the course of history. Some see this idea as a dangerous and the people who hold a belief in the existence of god as misguided. Arguments for and against the existence of God are part of an age-old, yet extremely heated debate. The major arguments for the existence of God consist of the general argument, the ontological argument, the intelligent design argument, and the cosmological argument. There are many arguments specifically against these.

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

There have been an innumerable amount of arguments for the existence of God for hundreds of years. Some have become much more popular due to their merit, and their ability to stay relevant through changing times. Two arguments in particular that have been discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each were proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction.

Read More
1060 Words | 5 Pages

The problem can be formulated in logical and evidential form. For the purpose of this assignment, we are concerned with the logical formulation of the problem. This challenge says it is irrational and hence impossible to believe in the existence of a good and powerful God on the basis of the existence of evil in the world. According to Marilyn McCord Adams, Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God (Melbourne University Press, 1999), 26. : 1.

Read More
945 Words | 4 Pages

St. Anselm and Descartes are known for presenting the first ontological arguments on the existence of God. The word ontological is a compound word derived from ‘ont’ which means exists or being and ‘–ology’ which means the study of. Even though Anselm and Descartes’ arguments differ slightly, they both stem from the same reasoning. Unlike the other two arguments on God’s existence (teleological and cosmological), the ontological argument does not seek to use any empirical evidence but rather concentrates on pure reason. The rationale behind this school of thought

Read More
1784 Words | 8 Pages

The traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

What are the arguments for the existence of God? Which do you find more compelling and why? Religion has been something that has been around since the dawn of humans. It is a way people live, or a culture that worships a higher controlling power such as a God like the Christians believe or multiple gods like polytheistic people believe. For philosophers, this is the “philosophy of religion.”

Read More

More about The Cosmological Argument For The Rationality Of Believing In God

Open Document