More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of cursive writing being taught
Importance of cursive handwriting
Should cursive be taught in school
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of cursive writing being taught
Even though this makes an effective argument, Carr isn’t afraid to go above and beyond to prove his point. Carr gives credit where credit is due and he compares his argument to a proposal made by Socrates. Socrates is a well-known and respected philosopher so this adds even more credibility to his argument. Carr says,“ … Socrates bemoaned the development of writing. He feared that, as people came to rely on the written word as a substitute for the knowledge they used to carry inside their heads, they would, in the words of one of the dialogue’s characters, “cease to exercise their memory and become forgetful.”
Neil Postman and Wendell Berry state that twentieth-century Americans are losing literacy and the ability to read and write, which weakens our ability to think for ourselves. Reading, writing, and thinking are connected through everyday life and as English speakers, it is our responsibility to preserve and correctly exercise the truth and validity of the English language. With the dependency on technology, relaxed educational standards, and even potential government control, we become stripped of our independence of thinking. With no free will to think, we are vulnerable to dominance and corruption, inability to argue complexly, oversimplification, and conformity. Neil Postman sets the scene of his essay, The Typographic Mind, by opening with an explanation of the famous Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas debate.
In her essay "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington presents her argument that texting does not impact formal writing written by students. She discusses the concerns presented by many people about how texting language can transfer into writing, but through the use of personal experiences and credible sources she discusses how this is not true. Her use of multiple different studies and situations help boost her argument and allow the reader to truly see how students actually do formal writing. She presents a strong argument as to why those who believe students don't have the control and knowledge to write formally, instead of with text speak, are wrong.
The influence of textspeak on teenagers' writing is a polarising concept with both fans and critics of texting weighing their opinions. In her essay, "Does Texting Affect Writing?", Michaela Cullington, a previous student of Marywood University in Pennsylvania, outlines her investigation into whether or not texting affects writing. Cullington analyzes the critiques of texting and why critics believe that texting has a detrimental affect on teenager writing. Along with the critics,
Michaela Cullington was a former student at University in Pennsylvania when she wrote the essay of “Does Texting Affect Writing?” Have you ever thought if texting truly effects our writing style when it comes to college levels? Cullington did research of her own from different people group asking this question. Her thesis sentence was “IT TAKES OVER OUR LIVES” (…). The way that she capitalized all the letters is something that can engage the reader and the curiosity of knowing what is taking our lives?
All of these factors combine and work well together to form a well-executed argument within Cullington’s essay. Cullington begins her essay by addressing her opposition: “It’s taking over our lives” (pg. 361). She cites studies done that suggest that a decline in the quality of students’ formal writing has occurred since the advent of text messaging, and she also cites teachers who believe that their own students’ works are influenced for the worse by the students’ being accustomed to texting and using textspeak. Cullington then proposes her opposing position that the writing of students is unaffected by their use of texting and text speak. She also cites studies that support her thesis that text messaging and textspeak do not have an effect on
Since its introduction by the ancient peoples of Mesopotamia, writing has become a means of communication that has changed the way ideas are shared. Writing opened the door for people to go from hunters and gatherers to civilizations. It allowed for communication to be shared not only mouth to mouth, but from letter to letter. In our history, certain documents have allowed certain individuals to change the course of history. There are certain historical documents that have changed the world and tell us very much about history.
Egypt, Mesopotamia, Shang/Zhou dynasties/China, and the Indus Valley are all different ancient river valley civilizations. All have different aspects of civilizations. Some aspects of civilization include technology, writing/language, specialized jobs, government, etc. These decisions were made based on the climate and biome the civilization was located in. These things needed to be taken into account because certain aspects of civilization were not suitable for every civilization.
Pinky and the Brain, two lab mice bent on taking over the world. Brain is the egocentric mouse, full of schemes for world domination. While Pinky is the open-minded and seemingly foolish mouse, always looking for gratification. They may have the same desires, but their differences lie in their methods of execution. Although they appear as allies their ideals often put them at odds.
In Raymond Carver’s “Cathedral,” written in 1983, the author points out that empathy and perspective are the only way to truly experience profound emotion. The narrator is struggling is sucked into his own comfort zone, he drowns his dissatisfaction on life, marriage, and job in alcohol. A man of limited awareness breaks through his limitations by socializing with a blind man. Despite Roberts physical limitations, he is the one who saved narrator from himself and helped him to find the ones vies of the world.
Postman addresses that writing is both a blessing and a burden. Basically, there are positive and negative effects of new technology. Communicating with other people
The subcortical brain is the area of the brain that focuses on survival (TedxTalks). Long-term exposure to trauma inflicted on a person can negatively affect the subcortical brain. This happens because the subcortical brain can become hyper-sensitive to stress when trauma is frequently inflicted on a person. Scientists observe war veterans for signs of post-traumatic stress disorder in attempt to explain this process. According to doctor John Rigg, a physiatrist who studies brain injury medicine, when a person has experienced trauma, they are prone to releasing stress hormones more regularly and reacting aggressively to potentially dangerous situations.
Cursive Handwriting should not be taught in school because there is not enough time in the schedule, there are computers to do the writing, and it is too hard to read. Mrs. Steel, please eliminate the handwriting class from the schedule. It takes up too much time and effort. We could be learning new stuff instead of cursive writing. Students can read better when they type in cursive on the computers then writing on a piece of paper.
On the other hand, Clive Thompson’s article, “The New Literacy”, takes the stance that technological advancements benefit our lives. She exemplifies this by focusing primarily on the benefits of technological advancements throughout her article. One instance of this would be her use of statistics from the Stanford Study of Writing. “For Lunsford, technology isn’t killing our ability to write. It’s reviving it- and pushing our literacy in bold new direction” (Thompson, Paragraph 3).
Imagine going to school and really succeeding; you understand everything, you’re getting good grades and all the praise you can dream of from your parents and teachers. But then you move up and things get harder, you don’t understand everything, your grades are dropping and you are scared that you will no longer get that praise. You have two options, you can either take on the challenge and get back to where you used to be, or you can sit down when you feel threated by the hard work. In “Brainology” by author Carol S. Dweck, we are shown research concerning those two options or “mindsets” and how we can change them.
