While evaluating the case study formed about my son, Joshua, it has become difficult to keep looking up and thinking that the school system will adjust in his benefit. It has been rigid to overcome the issues that have gone hand in hand with his Cystic Fibrosis, but I think there has been improvement. My role as already shown is Joshua’s parent. I have found several notions within the case study and John Santrock’s Educational Psychology book that without the knowledge of this class and child psychology I do not think it would be as easy. I appreciate Joshua’s teacher, principal and counselor in hopes of finding better ways for my son. When learning is tied in with real-life scenarios I feel like it can be constructive for children. So I …show more content…
C used MAP testing as a tool, her response was “basically only as a sorting tool after they take it. She said there’s just too many kids to actually look at their trend lines” (Frazelle 9). Although, I do not think standardized testing can always be accurate. Especially when it is corresponding with Joshua’s disorder, but there are supplementary purposes that could be an advantage to her and the other students. According to Santrock, standardized tests can “provide placement of students in specific programs” (516) including different reading groups. This further explained why Joshua had been reading at a lower level in the classroom versus at home. How do students improve tests that the results have not been studied? I also think, particularly to increase communication, I agree that standardized tests could “contribute to accountability” within the teachings. I also think this is a vast reason why some are scared of getting rid of tenure within schools. Although, I have no experience in teaching, I feel there should be certain time frames to have for student’s issues. If standardized tests were used in Joshua’s classroom other than just after the test was taken, I feel like there could be a higher recognition of improvement and less problems in some