ipl-logo

Czar Nicholas II: The Russian Revolution

462 Words2 Pages

Czar Nicholas II In 1917 the long trial of the Russian Revolution fell upon the citizens and serfs of Russia. The Russian Revolution was influenced by many people, but the country especially suffered from the choices of two men named Czar Nicholas and Vladimir Lenin. Both leaders had a different impact on the country of Russia, but Czar Nicholas’s poor leadership and stubbornness was the main contributor to the start of the Russian Revolution. Czar Nicholas II came from a long line of Russian rulers, and each of the leaders before him were known for their poor leadership. As suspected, Nicholas II was not the best fit for a king. He was poor commander, and he also caused many unneeded problems for Russia: “The Russian Revolution of 1917 …show more content…

He often listened and enforced rules that unqualified personnel such as his wife would offer. He shows these actions when the passage states that, “This might not have been so bad if Nicholas II had been a good leader. However, he most decidedly was not. He often listened to the advice of his German-born wife, Alexandra, whom no one trusted. (Germany was going to be Russia’s enemy in World War I.) His other close advisor was “the Mad Monk,” a man named Rasputin. Rasputin was crazy and gave Nicholas terrible advice, but Nicholas kept listening!” (“Czar”). These immoral decisions lead to many mishaps within his leadership and potentially were the reason that the Russian Revolution started. Although many will argue that Lenin’s good leadership, that led to his exile, was the reason the Russian Revolution started, Nicholas II made so many crucial mistakes that outweigh the decisions of Lenin. Having more of a positive impact, “Lenin began skillfully growing his power within the Bolsheviks. He was so successful in doing this that the government grew afraid of him, and he was exiled two years later” (“The”). The passage shows that Lenin did more good than bad, and on the other hand Nicholas II was never headed in a good

Show More
Related
740 Words | 3 Pages

He started the trend of “czars” in Russian government and declared himself the czar or Caesar. He was also referred to as the “gatherer of the Russian lands”. He realized that there was a problem with having 5 princes govern the same area and made strives to gain complete authority. He used several different methods to take control away from his brothers and the author says that despite his skilled efforts (diplomacy, force) luck was a vital component to his gaining the power. 2.

Read More
298 Words | 2 Pages

Accusing the boyars of murdering his wife, Ivan turned against them. He made his own police force, whose main job was to hunt down and murder people Ivan didnt like, or

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

Nicholas being notorious for disregarding advice, which led to his inexperienced political decision-making, as evidenced by source D. Rodzianko advises the Tsar to form a new government to save the Romanov Dynasty. Nicholas's response, "That fat

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

With no signs of the czar’s attempt to solve the complications, Russia banded together and filled the streets with strikes and riots. A revolution was peaking among the peasants. The uprising brought Nicholas ll no choice but to abdicate his throne. This was an opportunity

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

He was a failure to the Russian people in many ways. He failed to obtain a warm-water port for Russia which kept it isolated for many

Read More
1224 Words | 5 Pages

Furthermore, Nicholas allowed his country to enter two wars, the Russo-Japanese war and WWI, Russia being ill-prepared for the wars both times. The battles did not go well in either of the wars and his actions dealt great suffering to the people of Russia, especially the minority, or lower class. Although his country was in peril and he knew it, he refused to implement reforms. Tsar Nicholas II truly wanted to aid his country although his inexperience did not allow him to do so. Hence, this led to the murder of his family and the end of 3 centuries of Romanov ruling when the Bolsheviks took power of Russia.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

He took his already poverty induced and completely unprepared people to war against Japan. After the war Russia suffered a great deal of destruction and the people couldn’t continue to suffer the way they did for any longer. About 1000 protesters peacefully expressed their distress and were fired on when they approached the palace. Afterward the Czar created an elected “Duma” to represent the people but it had virtually no power and made almost no difference in the situations of the citizens. The supposed healer Rasputin became very influential in the palace because of his ability to heal the Czar’s son, further upsetting the people.

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

Czar Ivan IV inherited the throne, which made him the ruler of Russia. He was considered an absolute monarch and killed those who opposed him. Czar Ivan rises to power by expanding Russian territory. By expanding the Russian territory, he accomplished in taking over the influential regions of Kazan and Astrakhan. The challenges that Czar Invan IV faced were drought, famine, and the loss of his wife, which left him mentally unstable.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

What would you do if I told you that our own president, Barrack Obama, was a bloodthirsty murderer who raped women as if it were a casual way to spend his free time? Though this idea may seem controversial to some, in early Russia this statement had zero exaggeration to it. If the deaths of thousands of people due to psychological illness and paranoia is a normal sight to see in your eyes on a regular basis, then you might have lived between 1533 and 1584. During this time, Ivan Chetvyorty Vasilyevich (Ivan IV) reigned in Russia. The first appointed Czar of Russia, Ivan IV, better known as Ivan the Terrible, had a disturbed childhood which led to a severely unstable mental state and brutal rule.

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout Russia’s history, there have been many rulers that tried to manage their country in different ways. Even though, all of these rulers had their own unique ways of ruling, all of them were seen as terrible by the people. This eventually led to a tipping point for the Russian citizens and the Russian Revolution took place. The goal for these people was to gain freedom from their oppressive czar but instead, they got an even worse leader. Joseph Stalin was a leader of the Soviet Union from 1929 to 1953 and he was known for his ability to strike fear into people.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

In the story, “The Family Romanov: Murder, Rebellion, and the Fall of Imperial Russia,” Candace Fleming creates a captivating story of the Russian Revolution as it unfurled. Conservatively, the bélaya kost thought they had a superiority that nobody else possessed, which I can relate to. Secondly, Rasputin had the ability to sweep women off their feet, even though he is rude and liked to boast, which reminds me of a person I know. Lastly, when Fleming describes the children to be sad and nervous while waiting for their parents, it reminds me of a certain point in my life.

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

The great and terrible ruler managed to centralize the government powers in Russia, bring peace to both terror and security, and leave behind a legend the world will not forget. His strong belief in the Russian Orthodox Church and his unstable mind caused many goods and many bad effects on history. Ivan beat and killed several members of his staff, government, and family. He leads his mass armies into battle his own people and their rebellious ways and emerged victorious as a majority. Ivan the Terrible was a crazed man who lived to his historic name, as well as a capable leader and distinguished war leader much like unto Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

The Russian Revolution could have been halted or prevented if, in early times, Russia was given a czar with more experience

Read More
916 Words | 4 Pages

The overthrow of the Russian Tsarist autocracy by the urban proletariat in 1917 was the most significant event in Russian history. There were many phases of the revolution during 1905 and 1917. Since the foundation of industrialization in Russia during the late 19th century, a number of important events had taken place which would inevitably add to cause a rebellion against the Tsar Nicholas’s system of government. One of the fundamental problems that initiated the October Revolution of 1917 was due to the fact that Russia was ruled almost exclusively autocratically. With only one ruler controlling the large nation of 125 million people, this simply was not enough.

Read More
1070 Words | 5 Pages

I covered how Putin’s visionary leadership traits ignored key aspects of diversimilarity and show how he was methodical in planning and executing is objectives. I also demonstrated how his drive for success and a lack of open-mindedness made him an unethical leader. Finally, I reflected on my own leadership as it pertains to these lesson principles, and my pursuit to continue growing as a self-aware leader. Perhaps there would be no Russia, as we currently know it, without Putin”, certainly he has shaped his country and has effected countless lives and treasure. Influential Russian author, Fyodor Dostoevsky might have foreshadowed such a leader as Putin in his book The Brothers Karamazov: “He understood very well that for the meek soul of a simple Russian, exhausted by grief and hardship and, above all, by constant injustice and sin, there was no stronger need than to find a holy shrine or a saint to prostrate himself before to worship”.

Read More

More about Czar Nicholas II: The Russian Revolution

Related Topics

Open Document