Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of dakota access pipeline
Controversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
Hello Tamara Thank you for the insight on the federal Indian termination policies durning the 1950’s,and our selfish acts in attempting to move Indians off reservations and into subruban areas, I feel that justice could never be made for the todays native americans simply because the suffering we put their ansestors through could never take away the tears or pain we inflicted on them ,even though our federal government had even initiated a policy of removal as well as termination of the native americans under this particular policy that was souly created so the Native American people would no longer be government wards on reservations which todays era they are entiltled for the most psrt “subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges
For my research paper this fall I will be talking about Senator Jon Tester's voting habits on the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone XL Pipeline was a bill passed by the Senate by a vote of 62 to 36. This bill would allow the oil to be ship from Alberta to Illinois and then to Texas to be refined and sold. Jon Tester was one of the sixty-two members who supported the Keystone Pipeline because of its benefit on Montana's jobs and economy. However, Jon Tester has also spoken about how Montana and the United States needs to work towards cleaner energy alternatives.
The Keystone XL Pipeline Annotated Bibliography Biello, David. “Green Goo.” Scientific American. Jul. 2013. Vol.
Rather than forced Native American to leave their land, The president Jackson and the congress could develop some activities to share the outcome of gold with them. They could find and arrangement which could result to leave them on their land and share the outcomes of the exploitations of the gold and others natural resources.
The pipeline travels too close to our water supplies. Pipelines are known to create spills, and even the smallest spill could contaminate our water. Close to Ten thousand of my people could be affected if the pipeline is built near our reservation. Not only could the pipeline contaminate our water, but it also travels through a sacred burial
This highly debated topic has received widespread media coverage as more than 300 native tribes and numerous environmentalist groups have shown support for the Rock Sioux Tribe in 40 different states (Yubanet). Construction for the Dakota Access Pipeline should be permanently halted due to its imminent contamination of clean water, it’s disrespect to tribal land, and its causation of unnecessary violence towards protesters. Consequently, when reviewing the
Activists, wanting to make a change, have called for government reconsideration, health and safety issues, and discrimination on Native Americans. Thoreau believed that rebelling against the government was good as long as it slowed the “machine”. This can be seen in his essay when he states “...I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine,” (Thoreau, 946) which can be seen as controversial. However, the Keystone Pipeline activists agreed with Thoreau’s
This is largely why the movement gained major traction and worldwide media exposure, especially with the safety of both protestors and pipeline workers being called into question. Another central theme that was discussed in this novel is just how closely tied the fight for indigenous sovereignty is to the fight for climate change awareness. As our world becomes more and more exposed to toxic pollutants and widespread deforestation, the battle to conserve natural resources, climate change, and overall environmental awareness has been at the forefront of many political and economic debates. As evidenced by this book, Native Americans across the globe have been fighting for environmental protection for hundreds of years, establishing treaties, submitting to government powers, and even shedding blood to protect their sacred lands and the natural resources within. Throughout this novelization of current events, Estes uses that historical perspective when retelling the events surrounding DAPL, comparing the current fight against the pipeline’s construction to the long and turbulent history of indigenous resistance and
The government is backing out of its agreement. You left us on land that is too small a size and most of it cannot be farmed. The government should give more land back, not kick us off the leftovers” (Erdrich 197). The Indian tribe members are irritated with the Termination bill and attempt to communicate their thoughts with the Government. Additional members speak up with their concerns about the bill and they take a vote.
Rachele Liba Professor Whitehead POSC 100 22 July 2016 Placing a Price on a Green Nation Having lived a nomadic lifestyle across the United States, I have had the opportunity to witness the wonders of our flourishing society and the everyday turmoils that we face. Rigorous innovation has helped Americans fulfill countless dreams, however with every gift there is a usually a price-tag or opportunity cost. Now in the midst of the general presidential election, platforms that represent our beliefs can undergo much needed reform to address the opportunity costs that were surpassed in the process of success. Among the various problems found in our society, a key movement that has raised necessary controversy has to do with environmental policy.
Hello Diary, I am Helen Hunt Jackson's 1879, I went to Boston, I attended a meeting for representatives of the Ponca and Omaha Indian tribes .The Ponca and Omaha Indian tribes are getting treated unfairly. The Ponca and Omaha Indian are trying to get over the confiscation of their tribal lands by the token by the U.S. government. I have to work out some plans and write what I am going to do to help them. I understand how much they are losing and some of them are starving and haven’t slept, and have children.
The American society should strive to obtain higher standards of respect for the majority as well as the minority communities. There are not many people who are aware about the controversy and issues that the use of reclaimed water at the Snowbowl has created. Yet this disrespect to Indigenous belief has a long path in American history and Native American people. Indians were stripped of their land in 1829 because of the Homestead Act, which granted white people the right to claim up to 160 acres of land as their own. Even as the Constitution states that “all men are created equal”, Native Americans have faced discrimination, oppression, and racism due to their culture and skin color.
Have you ever had a family and a bright future in one place and were forced to move the place where you have lived for most and or all of your life? Well the Native Americans have or “The First Americans.” North America had people living in it long before the first explorers and settlers arrived. Unfortunately, they were pushed off of their land to make way for white settlers, who felt they had the right to own the land. In my essay I will be explaining how and if the way we treat the Native Americans over time has changed.
These issues can still improve through cooperation and understanding, however, and reaching a satisfactory decision about the Dakota Access Pipeline provides a perfect gateway to uplifting improvement of the reservations’ lifestyle. If the government agrees to give a little, a great opportunity arises for them to get a little as well. In the last decades, lack of funding has led to blatantly subpar education for the majority of Native American students, even when the government made an attempt to intervene due to an understandable inherent distrust of Government interference. Through a monumental compromise via the Dakota Access Pipeline, the government could prove its decency, transparency, and trustworthiness, which would advance the relationship of Native Americans and the United States Government brilliantly. The newfound trust could easily apply to areas such as financial welfare, educational support, and government-run health clinics.