Dark Of The Moon Analysis

745 Words3 Pages

For one thing, Dark of the Moon is a significant improvement over its disastrous predecessor Revenge of the Fallen. The franchise exists to show giant talking robots bashing into each other causing colossal destruction. This doesn’t mean that is bad at all. We want to see those things rather than paying attention to the humans. The title is called Transformers, and we pay our money to the theaters to see actual Transformers clamoring war with giant explosions no matter what. Weirdly, the movie delivers the satisfying yet entertaining robot destructions, but the lead up to the 1-hour long Chicago alien invasion is unbelievably wearisome and draws us a big yawn.

With regards to the title, Dark of the Moon, the film sets up an absorbing and intriguing plot line where it opens with a giant clamorous battle on Cybertron as an alien ship crashes to the Moon. The year 1969, which the moon landing occurred in history. Instead of the moon race, the film makes an excuse that Apollo 11 moon landing was the purpose of discovering the crashed alien …show more content…

This is faultlessly what the fans have wanted, a giant explosion filled, uproarious, clamorous Transformers destruction that takes place in Chicago. The amazing scene where the soldiers fly through the city between buildings running away from the battleships is where the 3D shines. Likewise, the Transformers action is all so great and just the last 1-hour Chicago demolition-like oversized destruction is worth the time and money. As well as the Transformers action and the visual eye candy, the 3D shots are splendid that really elevates the enjoyment of the last final act. In addition, from a Transformers flick, everyone expects the special effects to be all-good, and in the result, they are marvelously crafted and so awfully impressive as you exactly expected. Therefore, it is assuredly tough to shout that the movie is bad to be